RSHO vs. RZV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) to Guggenheim S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF (RZV)

RSHO

Tema American Reshoring ETF

RSHO Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, common and preferred stocks of publicly listed companies domiciled in the United States that are directly or indirectly economically tied to the rebuilding, bringing back of overseas economic activity, and revitalization of the American (i.e., United States) industrial base ("reshoring companies"). The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.90

Average Daily Volume

27,000

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RZV

Guggenheim S&P Smallcap 600 Pure Value ETF

RZV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P SmallCap 600 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$112.81

Average Daily Volume

5,145

Number of Holdings ^*

132

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RSHO	RZV
30 Days	2.92%	1.63%
60 Days	6.95%	3.50%
90 Days	10.20%	6.31%
12 Months	38.06%	22.17%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RSHO	Weight in RZV	Overlap

RSHO Overweight 25 Positions Relative to RZV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AIT	B	6.45%
ETN	B	5.4%
PRIM	A	5.22%
ROK	B	5.16%
CLH	C	4.7%
IR	B	4.5%
FAST	B	4.4%
PH	B	3.85%
VMC	B	3.85%
FLR	B	3.43%
CAT	C	3.26%
FSS	B	3.22%
HRI	C	3.14%
WCC	B	2.92%
EMR	A	2.87%
ABBV	F	2.87%
ATI	C	2.86%
LIN	D	2.75%
DHR	D	2.4%
ALLE	D	2.4%
UNP	D	2.2%
APG	C	2.04%
TEX	D	2.0%
TKR	F	1.81%
TSM	B	1.34%

RSHO Underweight 132 Positions Relative to RZV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PHIN	B	-2.17%
LUMN	C	-2.11%
CRGY	A	-2.08%
FDP	B	-1.99%
JBLU	F	-1.86%
BFH	B	-1.86%
UNFI	B	-1.85%
SATS	C	-1.84%
BHE	B	-1.8%
WKC	D	-1.75%
JXN	C	-1.71%
GDOT	D	-1.67%
GBX	B	-1.51%
GEO	A	-1.49%
DXPE	B	-1.47%
MD	C	-1.46%
NATL	B	-1.46%
SCSC	B	-1.43%
GNW	A	-1.38%
EZPW	A	-1.35%
HTZ	C	-1.34%
CWK	C	-1.32%
SNEX	B	-1.23%
HZO	F	-1.13%
ADNT	F	-1.11%
SANM	B	-1.1%
FL	F	-1.1%
REZI	A	-1.03%
NVRI	F	-1.02%
KELYA	F	-1.0%
AHCO	D	-0.95%
KSS	F	-0.87%
CENX	B	-0.87%
KALU	C	-0.86%
PRA	B	-0.85%
SBH	B	-0.85%
CHEF	B	-0.83%
VYX	C	-0.82%
WWW	A	-0.81%
SXC	A	-0.79%
SAH	B	-0.79%
ABM	B	-0.78%
UFCS	A	-0.78%
SPTN	F	-0.77%
TILE	B	-0.74%
XRX	F	-0.72%
MPW	F	-0.71%
PAHC	B	-0.7%
PENN	C	-0.7%
DLX	B	-0.69%
ALK	A	-0.69%
STC	B	-0.68%
AXL	C	-0.66%
ASIX	C	-0.66%
VSCO	A	-0.66%
AAP	D	-0.66%
HOPE	B	-0.65%
PRAA	C	-0.64%
ALGT	C	-0.64%
DNOW	B	-0.62%
SFNC	B	-0.62%
HSII	B	-0.62%
CAL	F	-0.61%
NWL	B	-0.61%
MODG	F	-0.61%
OI	D	-0.61%
GIII	D	-0.6%
SLG	B	-0.59%
MCY	B	-0.59%
TGNA	B	-0.59%
VTOL	B	-0.58%
SCVL	F	-0.58%
BDN	C	-0.57%
EGBN	B	-0.56%
TTMI	B	-0.56%
AOSL	C	-0.56%
HBI	B	-0.55%
PEB	F	-0.53%
MATV	F	-0.52%
BGS	F	-0.51%
CMA	B	-0.51%
RUN	F	-0.51%
LNC	B	-0.5%
DAN	F	-0.5%
UVV	B	-0.49%
SNDR	B	-0.49%
VSTO	A	-0.48%
DCOM	A	-0.48%
NBR	D	-0.46%
IBTX	B	-0.46%
VBTX	B	-0.46%
JBGS	F	-0.45%
BANC	B	-0.45%
VIRT	A	-0.45%
DXC	D	-0.43%
SEM	B	-0.42%
ASTE	C	-0.42%
HAFC	B	-0.42%
ODP	F	-0.42%
VFC	C	-0.42%
MDU	D	-0.41%
PFS	B	-0.41%
HCSG	C	-0.39%
RNST	B	-0.39%
HUBG	A	-0.37%
HFWA	B	-0.37%
NAVI	F	-0.37%
ECPG	C	-0.37%
PUMP	D	-0.37%
NTCT	C	-0.37%
HPP	F	-0.36%
BRKL	B	-0.36%
OMI	F	-0.36%
BKU	A	-0.35%
PSMT	D	-0.33%
WERN	B	-0.33%
WNC	D	-0.32%
SMP	C	-0.32%
MLKN	F	-0.31%
PPBI	B	-0.29%
LEG	F	-0.28%
CNSL	B	-0.26%
PDCO	F	-0.26%
AVNS	F	-0.26%
TALO	C	-0.26%
RC	D	-0.23%
HAIN	D	-0.2%
FLGT	F	-0.2%
THS	F	-0.19%
VSAT	F	-0.19%
TWI	F	-0.17%
SVC	F	-0.15%