RFV vs. MILN ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Global X Millennials Thematic ETF (MILN)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$126.73

Average Daily Volume

5,883

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

MILN

Global X Millennials Thematic ETF

MILN Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the INDXX Millennials Thematic Index. The fund invests more than 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of U.S. listed companies that provide exposure to the millennial generation, as defined by the index provider. The millennial generation refers to the demographic cohort in the U.S. with birth years ranging from 1980 to 2000. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.92

Average Daily Volume

7,388

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	MILN
30 Days	6.42%	7.24%
60 Days	8.22%	10.84%
90 Days	8.16%	14.77%
12 Months	24.43%	41.41%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in MILN	Overlap
AN	C	1.79%	0.47%	0.47%
GHC	B	1.9%	0.33%	0.33%
IRT	A	0.76%	0.32%	0.32%
UAA	C	0.44%	0.37%	0.37%

RFV Overweight 78 Positions Relative to MILN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LAD	A	2.66%
AVT	C	2.59%
MTZ	B	2.59%
SNX	D	2.39%
JLL	D	2.27%
THC	D	2.24%
USFD	A	2.07%
M	F	2.07%
UNM	A	2.02%
JWN	D	1.98%
X	B	1.97%
PPC	C	1.96%
AAL	B	1.92%
ARW	D	1.9%
PFGC	B	1.86%
PBF	D	1.79%
AA	A	1.78%
WCC	B	1.75%
R	B	1.74%
TMHC	C	1.74%
JEF	A	1.7%
DINO	D	1.54%
ARMK	B	1.48%
GT	C	1.43%
MAN	F	1.42%
KD	B	1.42%
ASB	B	1.41%
KMPR	A	1.33%
RGA	A	1.27%
ALLY	C	1.24%
FYBR	C	1.23%
CUZ	B	1.22%
ZION	B	1.18%
CMC	B	1.15%
WHR	B	1.15%
PAG	B	1.15%
FLR	B	1.14%
COHR	B	1.13%
FNB	A	1.11%
FHN	A	1.03%
PVH	C	1.03%
THO	B	1.02%
KRC	B	0.99%
VLY	B	0.98%
JHG	B	0.92%
CLF	F	0.92%
TCBI	C	0.91%
ONB	C	0.89%
LEA	F	0.89%
PRGO	C	0.84%
POST	C	0.82%
PB	B	0.82%
VAC	C	0.8%
HOG	D	0.78%
CNH	C	0.78%
CNO	B	0.74%
AR	B	0.71%
UGI	C	0.71%
GEF	A	0.68%
GAP	C	0.67%
WBS	A	0.67%
SWX	B	0.64%
BJ	A	0.63%
ENOV	C	0.62%
ORI	A	0.62%
BIO	C	0.59%
BKH	A	0.59%
OSK	C	0.58%
NVST	B	0.53%
FAF	A	0.52%
KNX	C	0.48%
BERY	C	0.48%
SR	A	0.47%
AGCO	D	0.45%
NOV	C	0.42%
UA	C	0.41%
VSH	F	0.35%
CNXC	F	0.23%

RFV Underweight 72 Positions Relative to MILN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SPOT	B	-3.91%
SE	A	-3.73%
FI	A	-3.53%
BKNG	A	-3.48%
PYPL	B	-3.37%
NFLX	A	-3.35%
AAPL	C	-3.27%
COST	A	-3.24%
DASH	B	-3.17%
HD	B	-3.0%
SBUX	A	-2.95%
LOW	C	-2.94%
AMZN	C	-2.88%
INTU	B	-2.86%
GOOGL	C	-2.85%
META	D	-2.82%
SQ	A	-2.72%
CMG	B	-2.52%
LULU	C	-2.38%
UBER	F	-2.37%
AVB	B	-2.26%
DIS	B	-2.23%
EBAY	D	-2.19%
NKE	F	-2.11%
ABNB	C	-2.04%
EQR	C	-1.93%
CVNA	B	-1.9%
EXPE	B	-1.6%
INVH	D	-1.41%
SNAP	D	-1.06%
UDR	B	-1.01%
SFM	A	-1.0%
SOFI	B	-0.9%
CPT	B	-0.9%
KMX	B	-0.84%
DKS	D	-0.79%
PLNT	A	-0.57%
MTCH	D	-0.56%
PTON	A	-0.56%
SKX	D	-0.55%
VFC	C	-0.53%
HIMS	B	-0.48%
VSCO	C	-0.48%
LC	A	-0.48%
LYFT	C	-0.47%
VMEO	B	-0.45%
ETSY	D	-0.43%
LTH	C	-0.42%
LRN	A	-0.42%
ZG	A	-0.41%
CARG	B	-0.4%
PRDO	B	-0.4%
SLM	A	-0.36%
COLM	C	-0.34%
LAUR	A	-0.32%
CSR	B	-0.31%
NNI	D	-0.3%
CARS	C	-0.28%
XPOF	C	-0.26%
STRA	C	-0.25%
W	D	-0.25%
CAR	C	-0.25%
YELP	C	-0.23%
ANGI	F	-0.22%
ZIP	D	-0.22%
CRI	F	-0.18%
DBI	F	-0.15%
CPRI	F	-0.15%
COUR	F	-0.14%
TRIP	F	-0.13%
ACCD	D	-0.11%
CHGG	C	-0.05%