QVAL vs. SMDV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV)

QVAL

ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.75

Average Daily Volume

20,417

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SMDV

ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF

SMDV Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index&#39;s weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$67.85

Average Daily Volume

59,121

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QVAL	SMDV
30 Days	1.77%	-2.29%
60 Days	6.81%	0.61%
90 Days	6.93%	11.09%
12 Months	30.43%	26.63%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in QVAL	Weight in SMDV	Overlap

QVAL Overweight 50 Positions Relative to SMDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
POWL	A	2.59%
SIG	C	2.29%
WSM	B	2.27%
ULTA	D	2.19%
DAL	C	2.19%
ASO	D	2.18%
UFPI	C	2.13%
KBH	C	2.09%
TPR	B	2.07%
CAT	A	2.06%
T	A	2.04%
JBL	D	2.04%
BKR	B	2.04%
OC	C	2.04%
CMCSA	B	2.03%
PCAR	D	2.03%
LBRT	F	2.03%
URBN	F	2.02%
LEN	B	2.02%
FCX	B	2.02%
OMC	C	2.01%
THC	C	2.01%
WCC	C	2.01%
HRB	C	1.99%
SNA	A	1.98%
MAT	D	1.97%
CRI	D	1.97%
CVS	D	1.97%
ALSN	A	1.96%
MOH	D	1.95%
FOXA	A	1.95%
CROX	C	1.95%
GTES	C	1.94%
GPK	C	1.93%
SLB	D	1.93%
CTSH	B	1.92%
HAL	F	1.9%
IPG	C	1.89%
ELV	F	1.88%
TAP	D	1.87%
CEIX	B	1.86%
MO	D	1.86%
TEX	F	1.85%
SKX	B	1.84%
ARCH	D	1.84%
SM	F	1.83%
WFRD	F	1.82%
MPC	F	1.82%
DVN	F	1.81%
CNC	F	1.81%

QVAL Underweight 98 Positions Relative to SMDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AIT	B	-1.13%
ABR	C	-1.13%
BMI	A	-1.12%
MATX	C	-1.1%
APOG	B	-1.09%
GFF	C	-1.09%
KAI	C	-1.08%
EXPO	A	-1.08%
MWA	A	-1.08%
HY	F	-1.07%
TRN	C	-1.07%
AVNT	C	-1.07%
LNN	C	-1.06%
SXI	C	-1.06%
FELE	C	-1.06%
NPO	C	-1.06%
WTS	C	-1.06%
GRC	B	-1.06%
POWI	F	-1.05%
PNM	B	-1.05%
ODC	D	-1.05%
OGS	C	-1.05%
CNS	C	-1.04%
SCL	D	-1.04%
NWE	B	-1.03%
MTRN	F	-1.03%
SFNC	C	-1.02%
HASI	C	-1.02%
CPK	C	-1.02%
ANDE	D	-1.02%
JJSF	B	-1.02%
MSEX	C	-1.02%
HNI	B	-1.02%
UTL	C	-1.01%
NWN	C	-1.01%
LMAT	B	-1.01%
MGRC	D	-1.01%
CTRE	B	-1.01%
ALG	D	-1.01%
CSGS	C	-1.01%
AWR	A	-1.01%
PLOW	C	-1.01%
AMSF	B	-1.0%
BKH	C	-1.0%
ORRF	C	-1.0%
SR	C	-1.0%
SPTN	B	-1.0%
BCPC	C	-1.0%
CCOI	B	-1.0%
ALE	A	-0.99%
UVV	D	-0.99%
UHT	C	-0.99%
KWR	D	-0.99%
NJR	C	-0.99%
IBCP	D	-0.98%
GTY	C	-0.98%
HMN	B	-0.98%
OTTR	F	-0.98%
FIBK	D	-0.98%
AVA	D	-0.98%
ABM	D	-0.98%
FRME	D	-0.97%
CWT	D	-0.97%
SBSI	D	-0.97%
SJW	D	-0.97%
NSP	F	-0.97%
JOUT	F	-0.97%
POR	C	-0.97%
PFBC	D	-0.97%
CADE	D	-0.97%
LANC	F	-0.97%
UCB	D	-0.96%
UBSI	D	-0.96%
YORW	D	-0.96%
TMP	D	-0.96%
WDFC	B	-0.96%
GABC	D	-0.96%
STBA	D	-0.96%
FUL	F	-0.96%
GATX	F	-0.96%
ASB	F	-0.95%
CBU	D	-0.95%
WASH	D	-0.95%
ENSG	D	-0.95%
MATW	F	-0.95%
AUB	D	-0.95%
MBWM	D	-0.95%
PEBO	F	-0.95%
NXRT	D	-0.94%
FULT	D	-0.94%
BUSE	D	-0.94%
INDB	D	-0.93%
HFWA	D	-0.93%
TRNO	D	-0.93%
PFC	D	-0.92%
WSBC	D	-0.91%
NBTB	D	-0.91%
HI	F	-0.9%