RFV vs. TMDV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$111.32

Average Daily Volume

12,001

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

TMDV

ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF

TMDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Russell 3000® Dividend Elite Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by FTSE International Limited, targets companies that are currently members of the Russell 3000 Index, have increased dividend payments each year for at least 35 years, and meet certain liquidity requirements. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.12

Average Daily Volume

537

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	TMDV
30 Days	-3.38%	-2.03%
60 Days	-0.77%	-2.71%
90 Days	-3.32%	-3.51%
12 Months	8.43%	-1.25%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in TMDV	Overlap
BKH	C	0.56%	1.65%	0.56%
ORI	C	0.57%	1.65%	0.57%
UGI	D	0.77%	1.44%	0.77%

RFV Overweight 81 Positions Relative to TMDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
M	D	2.88%
PBF	D	2.86%
AVT	D	2.81%
SNX	D	2.68%
MTZ	C	2.3%
ARW	D	2.26%
DINO	D	2.17%
X	D	2.12%
THC	B	2.06%
JWN	B	2.01%
LAD	D	1.96%
JLL	B	1.95%
USFD	B	1.93%
AA	B	1.91%
GT	F	1.88%
AN	C	1.85%
MAN	D	1.79%
PFGC	D	1.68%
PPC	A	1.65%
UNM	D	1.58%
GHC	C	1.55%
ALLY	B	1.51%
TMHC	D	1.51%
WCC	D	1.5%
ADNT	F	1.5%
R	B	1.45%
ARMK	B	1.44%
KD	B	1.42%
MDU	C	1.41%
CLF	D	1.29%
RGA	B	1.27%
PVH	F	1.24%
KMPR	C	1.22%
LEA	F	1.19%
ASB	C	1.18%
JEF	A	1.18%
PAG	D	1.17%
CMC	D	1.15%
FLR	B	1.09%
CUZ	C	1.0%
FYBR	B	0.99%
FNB	C	0.97%
WHR	C	0.97%
ZION	B	0.92%
THO	D	0.91%
COHR	A	0.9%
HOG	F	0.88%
KRC	D	0.88%
PRGO	D	0.88%
POST	C	0.87%
AR	C	0.86%
FHN	C	0.84%
GPS	C	0.83%
VAC	F	0.81%
CHK	C	0.76%
JHG	A	0.75%
ONB	B	0.74%
IRT	A	0.73%
BJ	B	0.72%
VLY	F	0.71%
SWX	D	0.69%
TGNA	D	0.69%
ENOV	F	0.68%
GEF	F	0.67%
TCBI	B	0.66%
PB	C	0.65%
OSK	D	0.61%
CNO	B	0.58%
NOV	C	0.55%
VSH	D	0.54%
AGCO	F	0.53%
WBS	D	0.52%
BERY	D	0.49%
SR	C	0.47%
NVST	F	0.47%
FAF	D	0.47%
KNX	C	0.45%
NYCB	D	0.39%
CNXC	C	0.37%
UA	D	0.35%
UAA	F	0.34%

RFV Underweight 62 Positions Relative to TMDV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ABM	B	-1.9%
CSL	C	-1.84%
WMT	A	-1.81%
KMB	B	-1.77%
CL	B	-1.77%
NFG	C	-1.76%
MMM	B	-1.76%
APD	D	-1.75%
ADM	C	-1.75%
AFL	B	-1.73%
KO	B	-1.68%
DOV	D	-1.67%
CWT	D	-1.66%
CBSH	C	-1.65%
PG	C	-1.64%
MKC	D	-1.63%
SPGI	B	-1.62%
MSEX	D	-1.61%
ATO	C	-1.61%
ED	D	-1.61%
CVX	D	-1.6%
CINF	B	-1.6%
MSA	B	-1.6%
TROW	C	-1.59%
PEP	D	-1.58%
AWR	D	-1.57%
FRT	C	-1.57%
EMR	C	-1.56%
UHT	B	-1.55%
BDX	F	-1.54%
UVV	F	-1.54%
NWN	F	-1.51%
FUL	D	-1.5%
RLI	D	-1.5%
ADP	D	-1.49%
SJW	F	-1.48%
MDT	D	-1.48%
SCL	D	-1.47%
TGT	D	-1.47%
RPM	D	-1.46%
UBSI	D	-1.45%
GWW	C	-1.44%
GPC	F	-1.44%
LANC	C	-1.43%
ITW	D	-1.43%
SYY	D	-1.42%
SWK	F	-1.42%
SON	F	-1.42%
CLX	D	-1.41%
LOW	D	-1.41%
HRL	F	-1.41%
MCD	F	-1.4%
PPG	D	-1.4%
JNJ	F	-1.4%
ABT	D	-1.38%
SHW	D	-1.38%
NDSN	D	-1.36%
BEN	D	-1.28%
NUE	D	-1.27%
WBA	F	-0.89%
LEG	F	-0.81%
SOLV	F	-0.22%