RFV vs. PSP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to PowerShares Listed Private Equity (PSP)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$110.07

Average Daily Volume

12,059

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSP

PowerShares Listed Private Equity

PSP Description

The PowerShares Global Listed Private Equity Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities, which may include American depository receipts and global depository receipts, that comprise the Index. The Index includes securities, ADRs and GDRs of 40 to 75 private equity companies, including business development companies (BDCs), master limited partnerships (MLPs) and other vehicles whose principal business is to invest in, lend capital to or provide services to privately held companies (collectively, listed private equity companies). The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.11

Average Daily Volume

14,893

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	PSP
30 Days	-3.32%	-0.78%
60 Days	-3.39%	1.08%
90 Days	-4.88%	0.61%
12 Months	10.20%	31.67%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in PSP	Overlap
	GHC	D	1.57%	1.16%	1.16%

RFV Overweight 83 Positions Relative to PSP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	F	2.92%
AVT	D	2.77%
M	C	2.65%
SNX	D	2.6%
X	C	2.36%
ARW	D	2.19%
MTZ	C	2.15%
DINO	D	2.13%
THC	C	2.08%
JWN	B	2.06%
AA	B	2.03%
LAD	F	1.99%
JLL	B	1.98%
AN	D	1.89%
GT	F	1.87%
USFD	C	1.84%
MAN	D	1.73%
PPC	B	1.67%
UNM	D	1.57%
PFGC	D	1.55%
ALLY	B	1.54%
WCC	D	1.49%
TMHC	D	1.48%
KD	C	1.48%
ADNT	F	1.48%
R	B	1.43%
CLF	D	1.42%
ARMK	C	1.41%
MDU	C	1.39%
JEF	B	1.31%
RGA	C	1.25%
KMPR	C	1.24%
ASB	D	1.2%
LEA	F	1.19%
PAG	D	1.15%
PVH	F	1.15%
WHR	C	1.13%
CMC	D	1.13%
FLR	B	1.1%
FYBR	B	1.02%
FNB	C	1.01%
CUZ	D	1.0%
THO	D	0.96%
ZION	C	0.96%
COHR	B	0.93%
PRGO	F	0.9%
KRC	F	0.9%
FHN	C	0.87%
POST	C	0.87%
AR	D	0.86%
HOG	F	0.86%
GPS	C	0.8%
VAC	F	0.79%
JHG	B	0.77%
CHK	D	0.76%
UGI	D	0.76%
ONB	B	0.76%
IRT	B	0.75%
VLY	F	0.72%
TGNA	D	0.71%
TCBI	C	0.69%
BJ	B	0.69%
PB	D	0.67%
ENOV	F	0.67%
SWX	D	0.66%
GEF	F	0.64%
OSK	D	0.61%
CNO	B	0.58%
BKH	D	0.57%
ORI	D	0.56%
WBS	D	0.54%
VSH	D	0.54%
NOV	D	0.53%
AGCO	F	0.52%
BERY	D	0.48%
NVST	F	0.48%
KNX	C	0.47%
FAF	D	0.47%
SR	C	0.47%
NYCB	D	0.43%
CNXC	C	0.42%
UAA	F	0.32%
UA	F	0.32%

RFV Underweight 27 Positions Relative to PSP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
KKR	C	-4.89%
BX	C	-4.78%
TPG	D	-4.29%
CG	C	-4.21%
OWL	D	-3.07%
ARCC	A	-2.99%
HLNE	B	-2.2%
STEP	B	-1.84%
IAC	F	-1.12%
BXSL	B	-0.97%
BBUC	D	-0.97%
FSK	A	-0.91%
CODI	D	-0.7%
GBDC	C	-0.7%
HTGC	A	-0.49%
MAIN	A	-0.49%
CNNE	D	-0.49%
PAX	F	-0.45%
PX	C	-0.25%
GAIN	B	-0.24%
BBDC	A	-0.24%
CSWC	A	-0.24%
BCSF	A	-0.24%
GSBD	A	-0.24%
SLRC	B	-0.23%
NMFC	C	-0.23%
TSLX	A	-0.23%