NSCS vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF (NSCS) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

NSCS

Nuveen Small Cap Select ETF

NSCS Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of the sum of its net assets and the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in exchange-traded common stocks of small-capitalization companies. It may invest up to 15% of its total assets in non-dollar denominated equity securities of non-U.S. issuers listed on a foreign exchange that trade on such exchange contemporaneously with the shares of the fund. Up to 15% of the fund's total assets may be invested in equity securities of emerging market issuers.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.50

Average Daily Volume

1,075

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$116.68

Average Daily Volume

11,439

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	NSCS	RFV
30 Days	-0.74%	-0.48%
60 Days	4.80%	4.39%
90 Days	6.95%	5.19%
12 Months	25.59%	24.02%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in NSCS	Weight in RFV	Overlap
BKH	C	1.3%	0.59%	0.59%
CMC	D	1.37%	1.1%	1.1%
FLR	D	1.52%	1.1%	1.1%
SR	C	0.92%	0.49%	0.49%

NSCS Overweight 70 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EVR	C	2.49%
WTFC	D	2.22%
PIPR	B	2.21%
SSB	C	1.83%
NOG	F	1.72%
PRMW	C	1.72%
BANR	C	1.65%
MMSI	C	1.61%
ESE	B	1.61%
ACA	C	1.58%
AIT	B	1.57%
AVNT	C	1.52%
HQY	C	1.52%
AVAV	B	1.52%
EHC	B	1.49%
FIBK	D	1.47%
EGP	D	1.47%
TPH	C	1.47%
STAG	D	1.45%
MGNI	D	1.44%
SHAK	C	1.42%
WK	D	1.41%
MMS	B	1.4%
KTOS	A	1.39%
TROX	D	1.38%
SUM	D	1.38%
SIG	C	1.38%
SHOO	A	1.38%
QTWO	C	1.37%
BYD	C	1.35%
ONTO	B	1.34%
ASGN	D	1.34%
HOMB	D	1.33%
EVRI	A	1.32%
NPO	C	1.3%
LITE	A	1.3%
GDYN	B	1.25%
OPCH	F	1.19%
ARCB	D	1.19%
RDNT	C	1.18%
MTDR	F	1.14%
CVLT	C	1.14%
ICHR	D	1.11%
PFBC	D	1.1%
GKOS	B	1.09%
SLAB	D	1.04%
LADR	D	1.02%
BRBR	C	1.02%
SEM	D	0.92%
RBRK	F	0.92%
PRI	A	0.88%
ENV	C	0.88%
KEX	C	0.87%
DAN	D	0.85%
ZD	D	0.82%
INN	A	0.79%
FROG	F	0.78%
SIBN	F	0.74%
TTMI	D	0.73%
INSM	D	0.72%
KRYS	D	0.71%
CRNX	C	0.69%
PCVX	B	0.67%
ESTA	D	0.66%
HALO	D	0.64%
ARHS	F	0.62%
MDGL	F	0.48%
TCMD	B	0.48%
IMVT	F	0.46%
BPMC	F	0.32%

NSCS Underweight 80 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AVT	C	-2.76%
SNX	C	-2.55%
JLL	B	-2.44%
MTZ	B	-2.41%
THC	C	-2.36%
LAD	C	-2.34%
ARW	C	-2.31%
M	F	-2.11%
USFD	C	-2.05%
X	F	-2.04%
JWN	D	-2.01%
AN	C	-1.98%
PBF	F	-1.88%
TMHC	C	-1.77%
PFGC	A	-1.77%
AA	B	-1.76%
PPC	B	-1.74%
MAN	D	-1.71%
GHC	B	-1.71%
DINO	F	-1.7%
UNM	A	-1.69%
AAL	D	-1.64%
R	C	-1.57%
ARMK	A	-1.53%
WCC	C	-1.51%
JEF	A	-1.47%
MDU	C	-1.43%
GT	F	-1.33%
FYBR	C	-1.31%
RGA	C	-1.25%
ALLY	F	-1.24%
CUZ	C	-1.22%
KMPR	D	-1.2%
KD	F	-1.2%
PAG	D	-1.19%
ASB	F	-1.18%
WHR	B	-1.12%
COHR	B	-1.09%
LEA	F	-1.07%
CLF	D	-1.06%
THO	B	-1.05%
KRC	C	-1.02%
PVH	F	-1.0%
FNB	D	-0.97%
HOG	D	-0.95%
ZION	D	-0.95%
POST	C	-0.91%
VLY	C	-0.88%
CNH	B	-0.86%
PRGO	F	-0.83%
FHN	D	-0.81%
JHG	C	-0.8%
UGI	C	-0.78%
ONB	D	-0.78%
IRT	C	-0.77%
TCBI	C	-0.75%
PB	D	-0.74%
VAC	D	-0.68%
CHK	D	-0.68%
AR	B	-0.67%
CNO	C	-0.67%
GEF	D	-0.66%
GAP	F	-0.66%
SWX	C	-0.64%
BJ	D	-0.62%
ORI	B	-0.61%
ENOV	F	-0.61%
BIO	B	-0.58%
FAF	B	-0.54%
WBS	D	-0.54%
NVST	D	-0.53%
OSK	F	-0.53%
BERY	C	-0.52%
AGCO	D	-0.49%
KNX	D	-0.47%
NOV	F	-0.43%
VSH	F	-0.42%
UAA	B	-0.41%
UA	B	-0.39%
CNXC	F	-0.31%