FELG vs. ROM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) to ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM)

FELG

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

FELG Description

The fund will invest at least 80% of assets in common stocks included in the Russell 1000® Growth Index, which is a market capitalization-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the large-cap growth segment of the U.S. equity market. The adviser will generally use computer-aided, quantitative analysis of historical valuation, growth, profitability, and other factors to select a broadly diversified group of stocks that may have the potential to provide a higher total return than that of the index. It will invest in domestic and foreign issuers. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.54

Average Daily Volume

218,971

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROM Description

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. TechnologySM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the technology sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, those involved in computers and office equipment, software, communications technology, semiconductors, diversified technology services and Internet services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.81

Average Daily Volume

35,837

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FELG	ROM
30 Days	3.26%	3.58%
60 Days	5.11%	8.67%
90 Days	6.08%	6.06%
12 Months	36.88%	44.73%

19 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in FELG	Weight in ROM	Overlap
AAPL	C	12.05%	10.41%	10.41%
ADBE	C	1.29%	1.77%	1.29%
AMAT	F	0.94%	1.11%	0.94%
AMD	F	0.01%	1.73%	0.01%
ANET	C	0.83%	0.77%	0.77%
AVGO	D	3.11%	3.08%	3.08%
CRM	B	0.59%	2.5%	0.59%
FTNT	C	0.65%	0.47%	0.47%
INTU	C	0.11%	1.53%	0.11%
KLAC	D	0.79%	0.66%	0.66%
LRCX	F	0.82%	0.72%	0.72%
MPWR	F	0.4%	0.22%	0.22%
MSFT	F	10.23%	9.39%	9.39%
MSI	B	0.65%	0.65%	0.65%
NOW	A	0.51%	1.65%	0.51%
NVDA	C	11.91%	10.63%	10.63%
ORCL	B	0.46%	2.33%	0.46%
QCOM	F	1.12%	1.42%	1.12%
ZBRA	B	0.09%	0.16%	0.09%

FELG Overweight 60 Positions Relative to ROM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AMZN	C	6.62%
META	D	4.74%
GOOGL	C	3.57%
TSLA	B	3.47%
GOOG	C	2.52%
MA	C	2.02%
NFLX	A	1.81%
LLY	F	1.54%
MRK	F	1.35%
V	A	1.2%
BKNG	A	1.1%
UBER	D	0.98%
ABBV	D	0.94%
COST	B	0.91%
CMG	B	0.77%
TJX	A	0.77%
UNP	C	0.74%
DASH	A	0.72%
WDAY	B	0.71%
ECL	D	0.7%
SQ	B	0.66%
CTAS	B	0.66%
TT	A	0.63%
LMT	D	0.62%
HD	A	0.62%
SCHW	B	0.59%
EXEL	B	0.57%
SPG	B	0.56%
HWM	A	0.55%
BMY	B	0.54%
GRMN	B	0.54%
ANF	C	0.52%
LYFT	C	0.51%
ZM	B	0.51%
TMUS	B	0.5%
NTRA	B	0.5%
INCY	C	0.5%
GILD	C	0.5%
NOC	D	0.49%
BBWI	D	0.45%
DBX	B	0.43%
IDXX	F	0.39%
ALLE	D	0.33%
AXON	A	0.32%
CAT	B	0.32%
APP	B	0.31%
TW	A	0.31%
TDC	D	0.3%
MSCI	C	0.26%
NU	C	0.19%
CLX	B	0.18%
PEP	F	0.15%
SCCO	F	0.14%
WMT	A	0.13%
MEDP	D	0.12%
BAH	F	0.11%
ISRG	A	0.1%
CVNA	B	0.07%
MORN	B	0.07%
TPL	A	0.03%

FELG Underweight 49 Positions Relative to ROM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSCO	B	-1.84%
ACN	C	-1.76%
IBM	C	-1.5%
TXN	C	-1.46%
PLTR	B	-1.05%
PANW	C	-0.99%
MU	D	-0.85%
INTC	D	-0.82%
ADI	D	-0.81%
APH	A	-0.67%
CDNS	B	-0.63%
SNPS	B	-0.63%
CRWD	B	-0.62%
ADSK	A	-0.51%
ROP	B	-0.47%
NXPI	D	-0.44%
FICO	B	-0.44%
IT	C	-0.32%
DELL	C	-0.3%
CTSH	B	-0.3%
HPQ	B	-0.29%
GLW	B	-0.28%
MCHP	D	-0.27%
ANSS	B	-0.23%
HPE	B	-0.22%
ON	D	-0.22%
KEYS	A	-0.21%
TYL	B	-0.2%
GDDY	A	-0.2%
CDW	F	-0.19%
NTAP	C	-0.19%
PTC	A	-0.18%
TDY	B	-0.17%
STX	D	-0.16%
FSLR	F	-0.16%
WDC	D	-0.16%
TRMB	B	-0.14%
GEN	B	-0.13%
TER	D	-0.13%
JBL	B	-0.12%
VRSN	F	-0.12%
AKAM	D	-0.11%
SWKS	F	-0.11%
EPAM	C	-0.11%
FFIV	B	-0.11%
JNPR	F	-0.1%
SMCI	F	-0.07%
ENPH	F	-0.06%
QRVO	F	-0.05%