EMLP vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

EMLP

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund

EMLP Description

The investment seeks total return. The fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowing for investment purposes) in equity securities of companies deemed by the sub-advisor to be engaged in the energy infrastructure sector. These companies principally include publicly-traded master limited partnerships and limited liability companies taxed as partnerships ("MLPs"), MLP affiliates, Canadian income trusts and their successor companies, pipeline companies, utilities, and other companies. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$30.52

Average Daily Volume

165,759

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$110.07

Average Daily Volume

12,059

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	EMLP	RFV
30 Days	-0.29%	-3.32%
60 Days	1.73%	-3.39%
90 Days	3.46%	-4.88%
12 Months	16.83%	10.20%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in EMLP	Weight in RFV	Overlap
	FLR	B	1.11%	1.1%	1.1%
	UGI	D	0.08%	0.76%	0.08%

EMLP Overweight 49 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EPD	B	8.48%
ET	B	7.18%
PAGP	B	4.97%
OKE	B	4.77%
KMI	B	4.53%
DTM	B	4.35%
SRE	B	4.05%
MPLX	B	3.95%
NFG	D	2.98%
TRGP	A	2.9%
PEG	B	2.72%
AEP	C	2.41%
PPL	D	2.36%
PWR	D	2.27%
WMB	B	2.19%
SO	B	2.01%
LNT	B	1.92%
ATO	D	1.91%
WEC	D	1.55%
LNG	B	1.51%
OGS	C	1.38%
SUN	C	1.34%
XEL	D	1.25%
EVRG	D	1.24%
DTE	D	1.2%
ETR	D	1.19%
CMS	D	1.18%
AES	D	1.09%
CQP	C	0.93%
NEP	F	0.91%
WLKP	B	0.9%
VST	C	0.81%
HESM	A	0.75%
CNP	B	0.74%
DUK	C	0.73%
WTRG	C	0.66%
CWEN	D	0.51%
IDA	D	0.48%
NJR	D	0.46%
ES	C	0.43%
AROC	B	0.4%
CEG	B	0.29%
AEE	D	0.25%
D	C	0.24%
CPK	C	0.23%
USAC	D	0.14%
EXC	D	0.1%
AWK	B	0.05%
ENLC	B	0.0%

EMLP Underweight 82 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	F	-2.92%
AVT	D	-2.77%
M	C	-2.65%
SNX	D	-2.6%
X	C	-2.36%
ARW	D	-2.19%
MTZ	C	-2.15%
DINO	D	-2.13%
THC	C	-2.08%
JWN	B	-2.06%
AA	B	-2.03%
LAD	F	-1.99%
JLL	B	-1.98%
AN	D	-1.89%
GT	F	-1.87%
USFD	C	-1.84%
MAN	D	-1.73%
PPC	B	-1.67%
UNM	D	-1.57%
GHC	D	-1.57%
PFGC	D	-1.55%
ALLY	B	-1.54%
WCC	D	-1.49%
TMHC	D	-1.48%
KD	C	-1.48%
ADNT	F	-1.48%
R	B	-1.43%
CLF	D	-1.42%
ARMK	C	-1.41%
MDU	C	-1.39%
JEF	B	-1.31%
RGA	C	-1.25%
KMPR	C	-1.24%
ASB	D	-1.2%
LEA	F	-1.19%
PAG	D	-1.15%
PVH	F	-1.15%
WHR	C	-1.13%
CMC	D	-1.13%
FYBR	B	-1.02%
FNB	C	-1.01%
CUZ	D	-1.0%
THO	D	-0.96%
ZION	C	-0.96%
COHR	B	-0.93%
PRGO	F	-0.9%
KRC	F	-0.9%
FHN	C	-0.87%
POST	C	-0.87%
AR	D	-0.86%
HOG	F	-0.86%
GPS	C	-0.8%
VAC	F	-0.79%
JHG	B	-0.77%
CHK	D	-0.76%
ONB	B	-0.76%
IRT	B	-0.75%
VLY	F	-0.72%
TGNA	D	-0.71%
TCBI	C	-0.69%
BJ	B	-0.69%
PB	D	-0.67%
ENOV	F	-0.67%
SWX	D	-0.66%
GEF	F	-0.64%
OSK	D	-0.61%
CNO	B	-0.58%
BKH	D	-0.57%
ORI	D	-0.56%
WBS	D	-0.54%
VSH	D	-0.54%
NOV	D	-0.53%
AGCO	F	-0.52%
BERY	D	-0.48%
NVST	F	-0.48%
KNX	C	-0.47%
FAF	D	-0.47%
SR	C	-0.47%
NYCB	D	-0.43%
CNXC	C	-0.42%
UAA	F	-0.32%
UA	F	-0.32%