EATZ vs. RFV ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$23.49
Average Daily Volume
1,198
21
RFV
Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF
RFV Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$113.84
Average Daily Volume
14,714
84
Performance
| Period | EATZ | RFV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.28% | 1.95% |
| 60 Days | -2.91% | -1.08% |
| 90 Days | 0.88% | 1.71% |
| 12 Months | 6.78% | 8.62% |
EATZ Overweight 19 Positions Relative to RFV
EATZ Underweight 82 Positions Relative to RFV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBF | F | -2.92% | |
| AVT | C | -2.77% | |
| M | C | -2.65% | |
| SNX | D | -2.6% | |
| X | C | -2.36% | |
| ARW | D | -2.19% | |
| MTZ | D | -2.15% | |
| DINO | F | -2.13% | |
| THC | B | -2.08% | |
| JWN | A | -2.06% | |
| AA | D | -2.03% | |
| LAD | D | -1.99% | |
| JLL | A | -1.98% | |
| AN | C | -1.89% | |
| GT | F | -1.87% | |
| MAN | F | -1.73% | |
| PPC | C | -1.67% | |
| UNM | D | -1.57% | |
| GHC | C | -1.57% | |
| PFGC | F | -1.55% | |
| ALLY | A | -1.54% | |
| WCC | D | -1.49% | |
| TMHC | C | -1.48% | |
| KD | C | -1.48% | |
| ADNT | F | -1.48% | |
| R | C | -1.43% | |
| CLF | F | -1.42% | |
| MDU | C | -1.39% | |
| JEF | A | -1.31% | |
| RGA | A | -1.25% | |
| KMPR | B | -1.24% | |
| ASB | C | -1.2% | |
| LEA | F | -1.19% | |
| PAG | C | -1.15% | |
| PVH | D | -1.15% | |
| WHR | C | -1.13% | |
| CMC | C | -1.13% | |
| FLR | A | -1.1% | |
| FYBR | B | -1.02% | |
| FNB | A | -1.01% | |
| CUZ | B | -1.0% | |
| THO | D | -0.96% | |
| ZION | A | -0.96% | |
| COHR | B | -0.93% | |
| PRGO | F | -0.9% | |
| KRC | C | -0.9% | |
| FHN | A | -0.87% | |
| POST | B | -0.87% | |
| AR | D | -0.86% | |
| HOG | D | -0.86% | |
| GPS | C | -0.8% | |
| VAC | F | -0.79% | |
| JHG | B | -0.77% | |
| CHK | D | -0.76% | |
| UGI | D | -0.76% | |
| ONB | A | -0.76% | |
| IRT | B | -0.75% | |
| VLY | D | -0.72% | |
| TGNA | C | -0.71% | |
| TCBI | B | -0.69% | |
| BJ | B | -0.69% | |
| PB | C | -0.67% | |
| ENOV | F | -0.67% | |
| SWX | D | -0.66% | |
| GEF | D | -0.64% | |
| OSK | D | -0.61% | |
| CNO | A | -0.58% | |
| BKH | C | -0.57% | |
| ORI | C | -0.56% | |
| WBS | C | -0.54% | |
| VSH | C | -0.54% | |
| NOV | C | -0.53% | |
| AGCO | F | -0.52% | |
| BERY | C | -0.48% | |
| NVST | F | -0.48% | |
| KNX | C | -0.47% | |
| FAF | D | -0.47% | |
| SR | B | -0.47% | |
| NYCB | D | -0.43% | |
| CNXC | D | -0.42% | |
| UAA | D | -0.32% | |
| UA | D | -0.32% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RFV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
