EATZ vs. RFV ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.38
Average Daily Volume
1,786
21
RFV
Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF
RFV Description
The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$124.43
Average Daily Volume
6,252
82
Performance
| Period | EATZ | RFV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.49% | 2.22% |
| 60 Days | 7.25% | 5.24% |
| 90 Days | 13.94% | 9.09% |
| 12 Months | 38.63% | 22.20% |
EATZ Underweight 79 Positions Relative to RFV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVT | C | -2.75% | |
| MTZ | B | -2.63% | |
| LAD | A | -2.6% | |
| SNX | C | -2.54% | |
| THC | C | -2.29% | |
| JLL | C | -2.26% | |
| X | C | -2.24% | |
| M | D | -2.16% | |
| PPC | B | -2.01% | |
| ARW | D | -1.98% | |
| AA | A | -1.95% | |
| JWN | C | -1.94% | |
| UNM | A | -1.91% | |
| GHC | B | -1.83% | |
| AAL | B | -1.8% | |
| AN | D | -1.77% | |
| TMHC | B | -1.74% | |
| WCC | B | -1.73% | |
| PBF | D | -1.73% | |
| R | B | -1.64% | |
| JEF | A | -1.61% | |
| GT | C | -1.48% | |
| DINO | D | -1.48% | |
| MAN | F | -1.45% | |
| ASB | B | -1.4% | |
| KD | A | -1.37% | |
| FLR | B | -1.3% | |
| ALLY | C | -1.28% | |
| CUZ | B | -1.24% | |
| KMPR | A | -1.22% | |
| COHR | C | -1.22% | |
| FYBR | C | -1.21% | |
| RGA | A | -1.2% | |
| CMC | B | -1.16% | |
| ZION | A | -1.13% | |
| PAG | B | -1.12% | |
| WHR | A | -1.08% | |
| CLF | F | -1.06% | |
| FNB | A | -1.06% | |
| PVH | C | -1.03% | |
| KRC | C | -1.02% | |
| THO | B | -1.0% | |
| FHN | A | -0.98% | |
| VLY | A | -0.96% | |
| LEA | F | -0.89% | |
| JHG | A | -0.87% | |
| ONB | B | -0.86% | |
| TCBI | A | -0.84% | |
| CNH | C | -0.84% | |
| PRGO | C | -0.82% | |
| POST | D | -0.81% | |
| VAC | C | -0.81% | |
| PB | A | -0.78% | |
| HOG | D | -0.78% | |
| IRT | A | -0.73% | |
| UGI | C | -0.72% | |
| CNO | A | -0.71% | |
| AR | B | -0.66% | |
| GEF | B | -0.66% | |
| GAP | C | -0.65% | |
| BJ | B | -0.64% | |
| WBS | A | -0.64% | |
| ENOV | C | -0.64% | |
| BIO | D | -0.62% | |
| SWX | A | -0.61% | |
| ORI | A | -0.6% | |
| OSK | B | -0.57% | |
| NVST | C | -0.56% | |
| BKH | A | -0.55% | |
| UAA | B | -0.49% | |
| FAF | C | -0.49% | |
| KNX | B | -0.48% | |
| BERY | C | -0.48% | |
| SR | A | -0.45% | |
| UA | B | -0.45% | |
| AGCO | D | -0.45% | |
| NOV | D | -0.42% | |
| VSH | F | -0.39% | |
| CNXC | F | -0.24% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RFV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
