TDVG vs. IQM ETF Comparison

Comparison of T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM)

TDVG

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF

TDVG Description

The investment seeks dividend income and long-term capital growth. The fund normally invests at least 80% of the fund's assets in stocks that have a strong track record of paying dividends or are expected to pay dividends over time (even if not currently paying dividends) (or futures that have similar economic characteristics). It primarily invests in exchange-traded securities that trade synchronously with the fund's shares, cash, and cash equivalents. The fund may also invest inADRs and common stocks listed on a foreign exchange that trade on such exchange synchronously with the fund's shares (i.e., during the U.S. listing exchange's trading hours).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.88

Average Daily Volume

66,312

Number of Holdings ^*

103

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

IQM Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of intelligent machines. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the advisor expects to have significant positions in particular sectors including technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.48

Average Daily Volume

2,836

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TDVG	IQM
30 Days	2.30%	-0.01%
60 Days	5.18%	1.10%
90 Days	5.43%	-1.54%
12 Months	24.23%	40.31%

10 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TDVG	Weight in IQM	Overlap
AAPL	C	4.79%	4.7%	4.7%
ADI	C	0.92%	1.89%	0.92%
AMAT	D	1.43%	2.76%	1.43%
APH	D	1.36%	1.64%	1.36%
HON	D	1.29%	0.38%	0.38%
KLAC	D	1.63%	1.63%	1.63%
MCHP	F	0.72%	0.4%	0.4%
ROP	C	1.49%	0.96%	0.96%
TEL	D	0.85%	0.68%	0.68%
TXN	C	0.52%	0.78%	0.52%

TDVG Overweight 93 Positions Relative to IQM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSFT	C	7.1%
V	C	2.16%
LLY	C	2.12%
JPM	D	2.09%
CB	B	1.93%
GE	B	1.85%
UNH	C	1.76%
MCK	F	1.75%
MMC	C	1.73%
TMO	B	1.52%
ACN	C	1.41%
XOM	C	1.33%
HLT	B	1.32%
ROST	C	1.29%
LIN	B	1.29%
BAC	D	1.25%
WMT	C	1.24%
AZN	D	1.23%
HD	B	1.21%
KO	C	1.19%
SCHW	D	1.18%
WCN	D	1.13%
CL	D	1.12%
AXP	B	1.11%
BR	D	1.1%
HWM	B	1.09%
DHR	B	1.05%
SYK	C	1.04%
BDX	D	1.04%
EQR	B	1.01%
ELV	C	0.97%
MS	D	0.95%
SLB	F	0.93%
PGR	B	0.93%
UNP	C	0.93%
ABBV	C	0.92%
TMUS	C	0.88%
NOC	B	0.86%
MCD	B	0.85%
AVY	C	0.82%
MDLZ	B	0.81%
COP	D	0.79%
AMT	C	0.75%
PEP	C	0.73%
TT	B	0.72%
EOG	D	0.7%
HIG	B	0.7%
PM	C	0.68%
KVUE	C	0.68%
SHW	B	0.68%
WFC	D	0.67%
ZTS	C	0.66%
COST	B	0.66%
AEE	C	0.66%
A	C	0.63%
ODFL	D	0.62%
EQT	D	0.6%
GS	C	0.57%
CSX	D	0.57%
CMS	C	0.56%
QCOM	D	0.55%
SPGI	B	0.54%
YUM	D	0.54%
CI	C	0.53%
TGT	C	0.52%
GEHC	C	0.52%
DG	F	0.52%
GEV	B	0.52%
ADP	B	0.51%
NEE	C	0.5%
ROK	D	0.5%
OTIS	C	0.47%
ATO	B	0.47%
JNJ	C	0.46%
TSCO	C	0.44%
WMB	B	0.41%
SWK	B	0.39%
STZ	D	0.37%
EFX	B	0.37%
ITW	C	0.37%
TTC	D	0.35%
CMI	C	0.35%
AON	B	0.32%
REXR	C	0.32%
MAR	C	0.31%
LVS	D	0.28%
RPM	B	0.27%
NKE	D	0.27%
BALL	C	0.26%
JBHT	D	0.22%
DE	B	0.21%
WEC	C	0.04%
MDT	C	0.02%

TDVG Underweight 35 Positions Relative to IQM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	D	-11.54%
ISRG	B	-5.94%
ASML	F	-4.09%
TSM	C	-4.0%
CDNS	D	-3.95%
AXON	B	-3.92%
SNPS	D	-3.79%
TSLA	C	-3.22%
AMD	D	-2.35%
PWR	B	-2.34%
AVGO	C	-1.97%
TER	D	-1.94%
ADSK	C	-1.87%
ANSS	D	-1.65%
ENTG	F	-1.44%
LRCX	F	-1.35%
PTC	D	-1.33%
IDXX	C	-1.3%
ETN	C	-1.27%
ALTR	C	-1.17%
UBER	C	-1.09%
VMI	D	-1.08%
NXPI	F	-0.92%
KEYS	C	-0.85%
CRWD	D	-0.71%
PRCT	C	-0.67%
ZBRA	B	-0.52%
FSLR	C	-0.48%
ALGN	D	-0.45%
VRT	C	-0.43%
BSY	D	-0.43%
TRMB	C	-0.42%
PSTG	F	-0.38%
MPWR	C	-0.29%
SITM	B	-0.24%