RFV vs. VABS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF (VABS)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$110.07

Average Daily Volume

12,059

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

VABS

Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF

VABS Description

The Fund seeks to generate income by investing primarily in short-duration, investment-grade securitized debt across asset-backed securities (ABS) and mortgage-backed securities (MBS), including commercial and residential MBS. A disciplined, time-tested investment process and rigorous risk management approach seeks to target ABS and MBS with competitive yield and current income across undervalued areas of securitized credit markets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.09

Average Daily Volume

1,164

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	VABS
30 Days	-3.32%	0.83%
60 Days	-3.39%	1.43%
90 Days	-4.88%	1.52%
12 Months	10.20%	6.33%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in VABS	Overlap
ALLY	B	1.54%	0.1%	0.1%
CNO	B	0.58%	0.01%	0.01%
FHN	C	0.87%	0.04%	0.04%
NYCB	D	0.43%	0.04%	0.04%

RFV Overweight 80 Positions Relative to VABS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	F	2.92%
AVT	D	2.77%
M	C	2.65%
SNX	D	2.6%
X	C	2.36%
ARW	D	2.19%
MTZ	C	2.15%
DINO	D	2.13%
THC	C	2.08%
JWN	B	2.06%
AA	B	2.03%
LAD	F	1.99%
JLL	B	1.98%
AN	D	1.89%
GT	F	1.87%
USFD	C	1.84%
MAN	D	1.73%
PPC	B	1.67%
UNM	D	1.57%
GHC	D	1.57%
PFGC	D	1.55%
WCC	D	1.49%
TMHC	D	1.48%
KD	C	1.48%
ADNT	F	1.48%
R	B	1.43%
CLF	D	1.42%
ARMK	C	1.41%
MDU	C	1.39%
JEF	B	1.31%
RGA	C	1.25%
KMPR	C	1.24%
ASB	D	1.2%
LEA	F	1.19%
PAG	D	1.15%
PVH	F	1.15%
WHR	C	1.13%
CMC	D	1.13%
FLR	B	1.1%
FYBR	B	1.02%
FNB	C	1.01%
CUZ	D	1.0%
THO	D	0.96%
ZION	C	0.96%
COHR	B	0.93%
PRGO	F	0.9%
KRC	F	0.9%
POST	C	0.87%
AR	D	0.86%
HOG	F	0.86%
GPS	C	0.8%
VAC	F	0.79%
JHG	B	0.77%
CHK	D	0.76%
UGI	D	0.76%
ONB	B	0.76%
IRT	B	0.75%
VLY	F	0.72%
TGNA	D	0.71%
TCBI	C	0.69%
BJ	B	0.69%
PB	D	0.67%
ENOV	F	0.67%
SWX	D	0.66%
GEF	F	0.64%
OSK	D	0.61%
BKH	D	0.57%
ORI	D	0.56%
WBS	D	0.54%
VSH	D	0.54%
NOV	D	0.53%
AGCO	F	0.52%
BERY	D	0.48%
NVST	F	0.48%
KNX	C	0.47%
FAF	D	0.47%
SR	C	0.47%
CNXC	C	0.42%
UAA	F	0.32%
UA	F	0.32%

RFV Underweight 49 Positions Relative to VABS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
RLJ	F	-4.48%
BW	C	-2.27%
NS	D	-2.1%
EFC	B	-1.89%
BFS	C	-1.53%
EQC	C	-1.49%
DRH	D	-1.35%
PBI	A	-1.34%
TWO	B	-1.26%
ARR	B	-1.25%
GNL	C	-0.94%
F	B	-0.87%
MFA	B	-0.86%
CIM	C	-0.82%
IVR	C	-0.78%
DBRG	F	-0.62%
ET	B	-0.55%
EPR	C	-0.47%
MITT	B	-0.45%
CTO	B	-0.29%
AEL	A	-0.28%
PSEC	C	-0.23%
TDS	B	-0.23%
PMT	C	-0.21%
AHH	B	-0.17%
SHO	C	-0.17%
LXP	B	-0.17%
INN	D	-0.16%
ATCOL	A	-0.15%
BHR	C	-0.15%
UMH	A	-0.11%
ABR	B	-0.1%
FTAI	B	-0.06%
ALTG	F	-0.05%
AL	C	-0.04%
CIO	C	-0.03%
NLY	C	-0.03%
SNV	B	-0.02%
DX	D	-0.02%
CODI	D	-0.02%
PEB	D	-0.01%
VNO	C	-0.01%
BOH	F	-0.01%
SF	B	-0.01%
EQH	B	-0.01%
COF	D	-0.01%
IFF	B	-0.01%
JPM	B	-0.01%
NEE	D	-0.01%