RFV vs. IHF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV) to iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF)

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$128.90

Average Daily Volume

5,821

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.30

Average Daily Volume

61,573

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFV	IHF
30 Days	8.77%	0.87%
60 Days	9.86%	-6.57%
90 Days	10.01%	-7.42%
12 Months	26.56%	4.75%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFV	Weight in IHF	Overlap
	THC	D	2.24%	2.55%	2.24%

RFV Overweight 81 Positions Relative to IHF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LAD	A	2.66%
AVT	C	2.59%
MTZ	B	2.59%
SNX	C	2.39%
JLL	D	2.27%
USFD	A	2.07%
M	D	2.07%
UNM	A	2.02%
JWN	C	1.98%
X	C	1.97%
PPC	C	1.96%
AAL	B	1.92%
GHC	C	1.9%
ARW	D	1.9%
PFGC	B	1.86%
PBF	D	1.79%
AN	C	1.79%
AA	B	1.78%
WCC	B	1.75%
R	B	1.74%
TMHC	B	1.74%
JEF	A	1.7%
DINO	D	1.54%
ARMK	B	1.48%
GT	C	1.43%
MAN	D	1.42%
KD	B	1.42%
ASB	B	1.41%
KMPR	B	1.33%
RGA	A	1.27%
ALLY	C	1.24%
FYBR	D	1.23%
CUZ	B	1.22%
ZION	B	1.18%
CMC	B	1.15%
WHR	B	1.15%
PAG	B	1.15%
FLR	B	1.14%
COHR	B	1.13%
FNB	A	1.11%
FHN	A	1.03%
PVH	C	1.03%
THO	B	1.02%
KRC	C	0.99%
VLY	B	0.98%
JHG	A	0.92%
CLF	F	0.92%
TCBI	B	0.91%
ONB	B	0.89%
LEA	D	0.89%
PRGO	B	0.84%
POST	C	0.82%
PB	A	0.82%
VAC	B	0.8%
HOG	D	0.78%
CNH	C	0.78%
IRT	A	0.76%
CNO	A	0.74%
AR	B	0.71%
UGI	A	0.71%
GEF	A	0.68%
GAP	C	0.67%
WBS	A	0.67%
SWX	B	0.64%
BJ	A	0.63%
ENOV	C	0.62%
ORI	A	0.62%
BIO	D	0.59%
BKH	A	0.59%
OSK	B	0.58%
NVST	B	0.53%
FAF	A	0.52%
KNX	B	0.48%
BERY	B	0.48%
SR	A	0.47%
AGCO	D	0.45%
UAA	C	0.44%
NOV	C	0.42%
UA	C	0.41%
VSH	D	0.35%
CNXC	F	0.23%

RFV Underweight 65 Positions Relative to IHF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UNH	C	-24.61%
ELV	F	-11.41%
CI	F	-8.11%
VEEV	C	-4.67%
CVS	D	-4.65%
HCA	F	-4.32%
HUM	C	-4.12%
CNC	D	-3.83%
LH	C	-3.38%
DGX	A	-3.06%
MOH	F	-2.95%
UHS	D	-2.05%
EHC	B	-1.7%
HQY	B	-1.47%
CHE	D	-1.44%
ENSG	D	-1.39%
DVA	B	-1.27%
DOCS	C	-1.06%
RDNT	B	-0.89%
SEM	B	-0.67%
OPCH	D	-0.64%
HIMS	B	-0.63%
GH	B	-0.61%
ACHC	F	-0.6%
CRVL	A	-0.54%
AMED	F	-0.5%
PINC	B	-0.4%
RCM	F	-0.38%
ADUS	D	-0.37%
PRVA	B	-0.37%
NEO	C	-0.33%
ASTH	D	-0.29%
SGRY	F	-0.29%
NHC	C	-0.27%
TDOC	C	-0.27%
EVH	F	-0.23%
USPH	B	-0.23%
CLOV	D	-0.21%
ALHC	C	-0.2%
MD	B	-0.2%
PGNY	F	-0.19%
CERT	F	-0.19%
SDGR	C	-0.18%
BKD	D	-0.18%
BTSG	C	-0.18%
PHR	F	-0.17%
LFST	C	-0.16%
PNTG	D	-0.16%
AMN	F	-0.15%
HSTM	B	-0.13%
CSTL	D	-0.13%
PACS	F	-0.11%
OPK	C	-0.1%
CYH	F	-0.08%
HCAT	D	-0.08%
SLP	D	-0.08%
AGL	F	-0.08%
FLGT	F	-0.06%
GDRX	F	-0.06%
DCGO	C	-0.06%
NRC	F	-0.05%
CCRN	F	-0.05%
DH	D	-0.04%
ACCD	D	-0.04%
MODV	C	-0.03%