REGL vs. XMVM ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM)

REGL

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

REGL Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400® Dividend Aristocrats Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index includes all companies meeting these requirements and includes a minimum of 40 stocks, each of which is equally weighted. No single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index&#39;s weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$86.17

Average Daily Volume

38,352

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF

XMVM Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index (the "underlying index"). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider compiles, maintains and calculates the underlying index, which is designed to track the performance of approximately 80 stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® that have the highest “value” and “momentum” scores.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$59.93

Average Daily Volume

15,466

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	REGL	XMVM
30 Days	5.14%	7.00%
60 Days	6.02%	8.35%
90 Days	7.76%	7.73%
12 Months	28.23%	31.69%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in REGL	Weight in XMVM	Overlap
ORI	A	2.15%	1.25%	1.25%
OZK	B	2.16%	1.64%	1.64%
R	B	2.42%	1.6%	1.6%
SWX	B	2.06%	0.78%	0.78%
UMBF	B	2.34%	1.45%	1.45%
UNM	A	2.25%	2.1%	2.1%

REGL Overweight 42 Positions Relative to XMVM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CBSH	B	2.34%
EVR	B	2.3%
UBSI	B	2.29%
PB	B	2.26%
RLI	A	2.22%
LECO	C	2.18%
CFR	B	2.18%
SLGN	A	2.17%
SEIC	B	2.17%
AFG	A	2.17%
THG	A	2.16%
GGG	B	2.15%
PRGO	C	2.14%
LANC	C	2.13%
CASY	A	2.12%
MSA	D	2.12%
ATR	B	2.11%
OGE	A	2.1%
RPM	A	2.09%
DCI	B	2.09%
BKH	A	2.09%
ELS	C	2.07%
NJR	A	2.06%
RRX	B	2.05%
OGS	A	2.04%
TTC	C	2.02%
NWE	C	2.01%
SR	A	2.0%
CSL	C	1.99%
WTRG	B	1.96%
NFG	A	1.95%
FLO	D	1.94%
WLK	D	1.91%
PII	F	1.91%
RNR	C	1.91%
SON	F	1.91%
CHE	D	1.9%
POR	C	1.9%
UGI	C	1.9%
WSM	C	1.89%
RGLD	C	1.85%
NNN	C	1.78%

REGL Underweight 73 Positions Relative to XMVM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LAD	A	-3.08%
AVT	C	-2.12%
CNX	A	-2.02%
CNO	B	-1.88%
GHC	B	-1.86%
WBS	A	-1.8%
PFGC	B	-1.75%
ARW	D	-1.69%
TMHC	C	-1.69%
PBF	D	-1.68%
PNFP	B	-1.66%
ONB	C	-1.64%
X	B	-1.63%
AN	C	-1.62%
DINO	D	-1.6%
PAG	B	-1.54%
FNB	A	-1.54%
CADE	B	-1.52%
SNX	D	-1.51%
ZION	B	-1.44%
TCBI	C	-1.43%
PPC	C	-1.43%
WTFC	A	-1.41%
JEF	A	-1.4%
JLL	D	-1.38%
HWC	B	-1.37%
ASB	B	-1.35%
KBH	D	-1.34%
THC	D	-1.34%
EWBC	A	-1.34%
CMC	B	-1.33%
USFD	A	-1.33%
MTG	C	-1.33%
JHG	B	-1.3%
THO	B	-1.3%
TOL	B	-1.27%
IBOC	B	-1.26%
ARMK	B	-1.25%
RGA	A	-1.17%
AMG	B	-1.17%
INGR	C	-1.17%
VNO	C	-1.16%
OVV	B	-1.15%
SLM	A	-1.09%
OSK	C	-1.07%
TEX	F	-1.07%
ESNT	F	-1.06%
PVH	C	-1.04%
PK	C	-0.99%
STWD	C	-0.98%
SF	B	-0.98%
FNF	B	-0.98%
DTM	A	-0.97%
FLR	B	-0.97%
TNL	A	-0.94%
POST	C	-0.93%
MTDR	B	-0.92%
ALLY	C	-0.91%
CIVI	D	-0.91%
UFPI	C	-0.87%
PR	B	-0.86%
MUSA	B	-0.86%
RS	B	-0.86%
MUR	D	-0.81%
CHRD	D	-0.78%
SAIC	F	-0.73%
WU	F	-0.7%
ASGN	F	-0.69%
VSH	F	-0.67%
TKR	D	-0.62%
ENS	F	-0.61%
GAP	C	-0.55%
AMKR	D	-0.5%