QQH vs. FFOG ETF Comparison

Comparison of HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) to Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG)

QQH

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQH Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index (the HCM 100 index). The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, including borrowings for investment purposes but exclusive of collateral held from securities lending, in securities included in the HCM 100 index. The HCM 100 index seeks to outperform the Solactive US Technology 100 Index, a proprietary methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$65.42

Average Daily Volume

21,371

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FFOG

Franklin Focused Growth ETF

FFOG Description

The fund invests predominantly in equity securities of companies that the investment manager believes offer compelling growth opportunities. In selecting securities, the investment manager considers many factors, including historical and potential growth in revenues and earnings, assessment of strength and quality of management, and determination of a company"s strategic positioning in its industry. The equity securities in which it invests are predominantly common stock. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.41

Average Daily Volume

19,924

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQH	FFOG
30 Days	4.28%	4.79%
60 Days	5.09%	6.07%
90 Days	8.37%	7.07%
12 Months	36.70%	43.21%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQH	Weight in FFOG	Overlap
ADI	D	0.43%	1.85%	0.43%
AMD	F	0.99%	0.98%	0.98%
AMZN	C	4.82%	9.37%	4.82%
AVGO	D	3.33%	2.69%	2.69%
CDNS	B	0.32%	3.51%	0.32%
COST	B	1.74%	4.9%	1.74%
GOOGL	C	2.1%	4.61%	2.1%
IDXX	F	0.14%	0.95%	0.14%
INTU	C	0.69%	1.59%	0.69%
ISRG	A	0.78%	2.91%	0.78%
MELI	D	0.35%	1.18%	0.35%
META	D	4.91%	6.95%	4.91%
MSFT	F	10.8%	10.58%	10.58%
NFLX	A	1.63%	1.08%	1.08%
NVDA	C	5.74%	15.77%	5.74%
TSLA	B	3.95%	3.33%	3.33%

QQH Overweight 78 Positions Relative to FFOG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TQQQ	C	19.74%
AAPL	C	11.9%
GOOG	C	2.09%
CSCO	B	1.03%
ADBE	C	1.02%
PEP	F	0.94%
LIN	D	0.93%
QCOM	F	0.83%
CMCSA	B	0.77%
TXN	C	0.74%
AMAT	F	0.69%
BKNG	A	0.69%
AMGN	D	0.64%
HON	B	0.62%
TMUS	B	0.5%
VRTX	F	0.49%
GILD	C	0.48%
ADP	B	0.48%
PANW	C	0.46%
SBUX	A	0.46%
INTC	D	0.43%
MU	D	0.43%
PYPL	B	0.38%
LRCX	F	0.36%
MDLZ	F	0.35%
REGN	F	0.33%
CEG	D	0.32%
KLAC	D	0.32%
SNPS	B	0.31%
CTAS	B	0.3%
CRWD	B	0.3%
MRVL	B	0.3%
PDD	F	0.3%
MAR	B	0.29%
ORLY	B	0.28%
CSX	B	0.28%
TTD	B	0.27%
FTNT	C	0.26%
ADSK	A	0.26%
PCAR	B	0.23%
ROP	B	0.23%
NXPI	D	0.23%
ABNB	C	0.23%
AEP	D	0.21%
WDAY	B	0.2%
ROST	C	0.19%
BKR	B	0.19%
FAST	B	0.19%
PAYX	C	0.18%
CPRT	A	0.18%
XEL	A	0.17%
VRSK	A	0.17%
EA	A	0.17%
EXC	C	0.16%
CHTR	C	0.16%
CTSH	B	0.16%
ODFL	B	0.16%
TEAM	A	0.15%
EBAY	D	0.14%
LULU	C	0.14%
MCHP	D	0.14%
FANG	D	0.13%
GEHC	F	0.13%
KDP	D	0.12%
MNST	C	0.12%
DXCM	D	0.12%
ON	D	0.12%
DDOG	A	0.12%
CSGP	D	0.12%
ANSS	B	0.11%
ILMN	D	0.1%
KHC	F	0.1%
BIIB	F	0.1%
CCEP	C	0.06%
MRNA	F	0.05%
BNTX	D	0.04%
SMCI	F	0.03%
GFS	C	0.01%

QQH Underweight 13 Positions Relative to FFOG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NOW	A	-4.83%
MA	C	-3.99%
LLY	F	-2.77%
AXON	A	-2.36%
SHOP	B	-2.06%
TSM	B	-2.0%
DHR	F	-1.65%
TW	A	-1.38%
UBER	D	-1.34%
ASML	F	-1.05%
NTRA	B	-1.0%
HUBS	A	-0.92%
TMO	F	-0.8%