MOTO vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF (MOTO) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
MOTO

SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF

MOTO Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund will invest in publicly-traded equity securities of domestic or foreign companies that are involved in the development and production of products or services for Smart Transportation, including safer, cleaner or connected vehicles and Smart Transportation companies providing transportation as a service. Under normal circumstances, it will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in Smart Transportation companies and Technology companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$43.01

Average Daily Volume

1,818

Number of Holdings *

18

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$117.07

Average Daily Volume

11,456

Number of Holdings *

83

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MOTO RFV
30 Days -1.29% -0.14%
60 Days 6.02% 4.74%
90 Days -4.36% 5.54%
12 Months 9.16% 21.53%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MOTO Weight in RFV Overlap
MOTO Overweight 18 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
TSM C 4.54%
ETN C 4.45%
PWR B 4.4%
NVDA C 4.29%
APH D 4.07%
GOOG C 3.83%
TSLA B 3.65%
ADI C 3.59%
NXPI F 3.45%
TEL D 3.12%
ON F 2.82%
ST F 2.73%
POWI F 2.47%
THRM F 2.46%
SWKS F 2.42%
APTV D 2.21%
DAR F 1.69%
DAN F 1.62%
MOTO Underweight 83 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
AVT B -2.74%
SNX C -2.58%
MTZ C -2.52%
THC C -2.42%
JLL B -2.4%
ARW C -2.31%
LAD B -2.27%
X F -2.24%
M F -2.16%
JWN D -2.1%
USFD C -2.05%
AN B -1.98%
PBF F -1.96%
TMHC B -1.83%
DINO F -1.78%
PFGC B -1.77%
MAN D -1.76%
PPC A -1.72%
UNM A -1.7%
GHC B -1.7%
R C -1.62%
AA C -1.55%
ARMK B -1.53%
JEF B -1.52%
WCC C -1.5%
MDU C -1.45%
FYBR C -1.33%
GT F -1.33%
ADNT D -1.3%
RGA C -1.28%
KD F -1.27%
ALLY F -1.25%
CUZ C -1.23%
KMPR D -1.21%
ASB F -1.21%
PAG D -1.19%
FLR D -1.12%
CMC C -1.09%
WHR C -1.09%
KRC C -1.07%
LEA F -1.06%
COHR B -1.04%
FNB D -1.02%
THO C -1.02%
PVH F -1.02%
ZION D -1.01%
CLF D -1.0%
HOG C -0.98%
POST B -0.92%
VLY C -0.92%
PRGO F -0.89%
FHN D -0.86%
ONB D -0.82%
JHG C -0.81%
IRT C -0.8%
TCBI C -0.78%
PB D -0.77%
UGI C -0.77%
TGNA B -0.74%
CNO C -0.7%
AR C -0.68%
VAC D -0.68%
CHK C -0.68%
GEF C -0.67%
SWX C -0.66%
GAP F -0.65%
ENOV F -0.63%
ORI A -0.62%
BJ D -0.62%
BKH B -0.6%
WBS D -0.57%
FAF B -0.55%
OSK F -0.55%
NVST D -0.53%
BERY C -0.51%
SR A -0.5%
AGCO D -0.49%
NOV F -0.47%
KNX C -0.47%
VSH F -0.43%
UAA B -0.38%
CNXC F -0.38%
UA B -0.37%
Compare ETFs