FNDF vs. QQH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH)
FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

FNDF Description

The investment seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. The index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size - adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks - rather than market capitalization. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the index. It may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.70

Average Daily Volume

837,819

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QQH

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQH Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index (the HCM 100 index). The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, including borrowings for investment purposes but exclusive of collateral held from securities lending, in securities included in the HCM 100 index. The HCM 100 index seeks to outperform the Solactive US Technology 100 Index, a proprietary methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.45

Average Daily Volume

25,825

Number of Holdings *

96

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FNDF QQH
30 Days 5.34% 2.72%
60 Days 0.17% -11.82%
90 Days 0.49% -1.58%
12 Months 14.95% 21.93%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FNDF Weight in QQH Overlap
BNTX C 0.03% 0.03% 0.03%
CCEP A 0.01% 0.07% 0.01%
LULU F 0.01% 0.13% 0.01%
NXPI D 0.03% 0.29% 0.03%
FNDF Overweight 45 Positions Relative to QQH
Symbol Grade Weight
TM F 1.31%
HMC D 0.7%
NVS B 0.64%
UL A 0.62%
MUFG D 0.47%
SONY B 0.47%
E D 0.41%
TD A 0.4%
SMFG D 0.39%
BCS B 0.38%
LYG C 0.37%
STLA F 0.35%
MFG D 0.26%
MT D 0.22%
ABBV B 0.22%
KB C 0.2%
SHG B 0.19%
GOLD C 0.18%
CNI D 0.18%
DEO C 0.16%
KEP B 0.12%
MDT A 0.11%
AGCO F 0.08%
WFG B 0.08%
SW D 0.08%
NMR D 0.08%
WCN B 0.07%
LPL F 0.06%
FLUT A 0.04%
LOGI D 0.04%
ZIM D 0.03%
OTEX C 0.03%
KT A 0.02%
SKM A 0.02%
APTV D 0.02%
TT B 0.02%
ALLE B 0.01%
ARM D 0.01%
ICLR D 0.01%
PRGO C 0.01%
ALV D 0.01%
TIGO A 0.01%
CHKP B 0.01%
GRMN B 0.01%
AER C 0.01%
FNDF Underweight 92 Positions Relative to QQH
Symbol Grade Weight
AAPL C -12.71%
MSFT D -11.57%
NVDA D -5.21%
META C -5.03%
AMZN D -4.59%
AVGO D -3.6%
TSLA D -2.68%
GOOG D -2.11%
GOOGL D -2.11%
COST B -1.81%
NFLX B -1.4%
ADBE B -1.27%
AMD F -1.15%
PEP A -1.11%
LIN B -1.07%
QCOM F -1.02%
CSCO B -0.98%
TXN C -0.87%
AMAT F -0.86%
AMGN C -0.81%
ISRG B -0.77%
CMCSA C -0.77%
INTU D -0.72%
HON D -0.62%
BKNG C -0.59%
VRTX D -0.58%
REGN B -0.56%
ADI C -0.52%
SBUX B -0.48%
ADP B -0.48%
GILD A -0.47%
KLAC D -0.47%
PANW B -0.46%
TMUS B -0.46%
MU F -0.45%
LRCX F -0.45%
MDLZ A -0.42%
INTC F -0.42%
MELI B -0.4%
PYPL B -0.35%
SNPS D -0.32%
CDNS D -0.31%
CTAS B -0.3%
CSX D -0.3%
ORLY B -0.29%
CEG D -0.29%
MRVL D -0.28%
PDD F -0.27%
CRWD F -0.26%
MAR D -0.26%
TTD B -0.25%
ROP C -0.25%
FTNT B -0.23%
ADSK B -0.23%
AEP A -0.23%
ABNB F -0.22%
ROST B -0.22%
WDAY C -0.22%
PCAR D -0.21%
CPRT D -0.19%
MCHP D -0.19%
CTSH B -0.18%
PAYX B -0.18%
EXC A -0.17%
IDXX D -0.17%
FAST D -0.17%
EA C -0.17%
VRSK C -0.17%
XEL A -0.16%
ODFL D -0.16%
BKR D -0.16%
EBAY A -0.15%
FANG D -0.15%
ON D -0.15%
CHTR C -0.15%
GEHC B -0.14%
KDP A -0.14%
BIIB D -0.14%
CSGP C -0.13%
ANSS D -0.12%
DXCM F -0.12%
MRNA F -0.12%
KHC A -0.12%
TEAM F -0.11%
MNST D -0.11%
DDOG D -0.11%
ILMN B -0.1%
WBD D -0.09%
DLTR F -0.08%
ALGN F -0.07%
SMCI F -0.05%
GFS F -0.01%
Compare ETFs