CPAI vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)
CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description

CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.81

Average Daily Volume

7,195

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$126.73

Average Daily Volume

5,883

Number of Holdings *

82

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CPAI RFV
30 Days 5.48% 6.42%
60 Days 9.78% 8.22%
90 Days 11.01% 8.16%
12 Months 24.43%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CPAI Weight in RFV Overlap
CNO B 2.15% 0.74% 0.74%
THC D 1.88% 2.24% 1.88%
UNM A 2.25% 2.02% 2.02%
CPAI Overweight 46 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
SFM A 2.51%
SKYW C 2.49%
TRGP A 2.46%
TDS B 2.43%
CARG B 2.37%
LDOS C 2.33%
NTGR B 2.27%
GDDY A 2.23%
OKE A 2.21%
FTDR B 2.17%
BRBR A 2.17%
EQH C 2.16%
HTZ C 2.13%
FTI A 2.13%
ACIW B 2.11%
VIRT A 2.11%
ORCL A 2.09%
CVLT B 2.08%
CAH B 2.08%
MSI B 2.07%
CLBT B 2.06%
COR B 2.05%
GOOGL C 2.05%
GNW A 2.03%
PBI B 2.01%
PGR A 1.93%
META D 1.93%
RTX D 1.9%
BRC D 1.89%
TJX A 1.89%
LESL D 1.87%
NYT D 1.85%
ZIM C 1.84%
MSFT D 1.83%
WBA F 1.82%
AAPL C 1.81%
PAA B 1.8%
PAGP A 1.79%
WES C 1.76%
LLY F 1.74%
MHO D 1.72%
PRM C 1.72%
ROST D 1.72%
UHS D 1.64%
HCA F 1.61%
AGL F 0.95%
CPAI Underweight 79 Positions Relative to RFV
Symbol Grade Weight
LAD A -2.66%
AVT C -2.59%
MTZ B -2.59%
SNX D -2.39%
JLL D -2.27%
USFD A -2.07%
M F -2.07%
JWN D -1.98%
X B -1.97%
PPC C -1.96%
AAL B -1.92%
GHC B -1.9%
ARW D -1.9%
PFGC B -1.86%
PBF D -1.79%
AN C -1.79%
AA A -1.78%
WCC B -1.75%
R B -1.74%
TMHC C -1.74%
JEF A -1.7%
DINO D -1.54%
ARMK B -1.48%
GT C -1.43%
MAN F -1.42%
KD B -1.42%
ASB B -1.41%
KMPR A -1.33%
RGA A -1.27%
ALLY C -1.24%
FYBR C -1.23%
CUZ B -1.22%
ZION B -1.18%
CMC B -1.15%
WHR B -1.15%
PAG B -1.15%
FLR B -1.14%
COHR B -1.13%
FNB A -1.11%
FHN A -1.03%
PVH C -1.03%
THO B -1.02%
KRC B -0.99%
VLY B -0.98%
JHG B -0.92%
CLF F -0.92%
TCBI C -0.91%
ONB C -0.89%
LEA F -0.89%
PRGO C -0.84%
POST C -0.82%
PB B -0.82%
VAC C -0.8%
HOG D -0.78%
CNH C -0.78%
IRT A -0.76%
AR B -0.71%
UGI C -0.71%
GEF A -0.68%
GAP C -0.67%
WBS A -0.67%
SWX B -0.64%
BJ A -0.63%
ENOV C -0.62%
ORI A -0.62%
BIO C -0.59%
BKH A -0.59%
OSK C -0.58%
NVST B -0.53%
FAF A -0.52%
KNX C -0.48%
BERY C -0.48%
SR A -0.47%
AGCO D -0.45%
UAA C -0.44%
NOV C -0.42%
UA C -0.41%
VSH F -0.35%
CNXC F -0.23%
Compare ETFs