XSHQ vs. MOO ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares S&P SmallCap Quality Portfolio (XSHQ) to Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF (MOO)
XSHQ

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Quality Portfolio

XSHQ Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Quality Portfolio (the "Fund") is based on the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index (Index). The Fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is composed of 120 securities in the S&P SmallCap 600 Index that have the highest quality score, which is calculated based on the average of three fundamental measures: return on equity, accruals ratio and financial leverage ratio. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted semi-annually on the third Friday of June and December.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.81

Average Daily Volume

35,750

Number of Holdings *

117

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MOO

Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF

MOO Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Market Vectors® Global Agribusiness Index. The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities that comprise the fund's benchmark index. The Agribusiness Index is comprised of equity securities of companies that generate at least 50% of their revenues from: (i) agri-chemicals and fertilizers, seeds and traits, (ii) farm/irrigation equipment and farm machinery and/or (iii) agricultural products, aquaculture and fishing, livestocks, plantations and trading of agricultural products. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.33

Average Daily Volume

52,356

Number of Holdings *

18

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XSHQ MOO
30 Days 2.12% -0.62%
60 Days -0.48% -5.64%
90 Days 2.00% -2.28%
12 Months 9.53% -12.85%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XSHQ Weight in MOO Overlap
BCPC B 1.42% 1.09% 1.09%
XSHQ Overweight 116 Positions Relative to MOO
Symbol Grade Weight
ANF C 3.68%
MLI B 3.0%
JXN B 2.45%
AWI C 2.14%
APAM D 2.02%
IBP C 1.92%
BMI C 1.87%
ALKS F 1.82%
KTB D 1.77%
LNC B 1.73%
FSS C 1.65%
JBT D 1.64%
SIG D 1.56%
BCC D 1.55%
SM D 1.53%
PJT B 1.47%
ASO F 1.41%
WDFC D 1.39%
AMR D 1.39%
WIRE A 1.37%
RDN B 1.35%
FELE C 1.27%
CORT C 1.24%
CEIX C 1.23%
AEO D 1.22%
AGO C 1.19%
MHO C 1.15%
HP D 1.13%
OTTR D 1.1%
FBP A 1.09%
FTDR D 1.07%
ARCH F 1.07%
BRC C 1.05%
AGYS B 1.05%
AX B 1.01%
CRVL B 0.99%
GMS D 0.98%
CNS B 0.96%
IDCC B 0.95%
NMIH A 0.93%
SHOO B 0.91%
IOSP D 0.88%
LCII D 0.85%
TBBK C 0.81%
CATY C 0.8%
YELP F 0.8%
DORM D 0.77%
WOR F 0.76%
ROCK D 0.76%
EPAC B 0.75%
UE A 0.73%
PATK C 0.73%
STAA C 0.73%
POWL D 0.73%
PLMR C 0.72%
TNC D 0.68%
ANDE F 0.66%
IPAR D 0.65%
CENTA D 0.61%
BKE C 0.6%
APOG D 0.6%
PDCO F 0.59%
DFIN D 0.59%
OFG A 0.58%
KLG F 0.58%
CASH B 0.58%
ASTH B 0.55%
SXI C 0.54%
LPG D 0.54%
FIZZ C 0.53%
OXM D 0.51%
CENX C 0.51%
CHCO B 0.49%
GIII F 0.49%
PLAB F 0.49%
WABC C 0.48%
PRG D 0.47%
LKFN C 0.47%
NHC B 0.46%
VRTS C 0.46%
COLL D 0.46%
HWKN B 0.46%
DNOW D 0.45%
WNC F 0.45%
WS C 0.45%
GRBK A 0.44%
CAL D 0.43%
LNN F 0.43%
MCY D 0.43%
AMWD D 0.42%
PCRX F 0.42%
BANF C 0.41%
HRMY C 0.4%
ATEN D 0.4%
GDEN F 0.4%
JBSS D 0.38%
CSGS D 0.37%
PFBC C 0.36%
SLCA D 0.35%
AMSF D 0.34%
EIG B 0.33%
MCRI C 0.33%
REX D 0.3%
CVI F 0.29%
HCI F 0.28%
TILE D 0.27%
IIIN D 0.25%
CLW D 0.24%
SLP F 0.24%
CCRN F 0.2%
MNRO F 0.2%
GES D 0.17%
USNA F 0.15%
LQDT B 0.15%
RES F 0.15%
NPK D 0.12%
XSHQ Underweight 17 Positions Relative to MOO
Symbol Grade Weight
ZTS C -8.09%
DE F -7.94%
CTVA D -7.16%
ADM C -5.77%
TSN D -4.7%
BG B -3.54%
CF F -3.25%
MOS F -2.38%
CNH F -2.35%
TTC C -2.14%
FMC F -1.76%
AGCO F -1.73%
DAR F -1.65%
SQM F -1.47%
ELAN F -1.44%
NEOG C -0.85%
PPC C -0.6%
Compare ETFs