XLK vs. ACIO ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR Select Sector Fund - Technology (XLK) to Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO)

XLK

SPDR Select Sector Fund - Technology

XLK Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in The Technology Select Sector Index. In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy, which means that the fund typically invests in substantially all of the securities represented in the index in approximately the same proportions as the index. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$225.29

Average Daily Volume

5,254,836

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ACIO

Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF

ACIO Description

The investment seeks current income and capital appreciation. The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) that seeks to achieve its investment objective principally by investing in a portfolio of large capitalization U.S.-listed equity securities and an options collar (i.e., a mix of written (sold) call options and long (bought) put options) on the same underlying equity securities. It may write call options on up to 100% of each equity position held in the portfolio and will use a portion of the premium received from writing such call options to purchase put options. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.76

Average Daily Volume

163,071

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XLK	ACIO
30 Days	7.64%	2.74%
60 Days	14.04%	8.10%
90 Days	-3.09%	3.71%
12 Months	37.45%	31.95%

12 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XLK	Weight in ACIO	Overlap
AAPL	C	14.93%	6.78%	6.78%
ACN	B	2.49%	1.09%	1.09%
ADBE	F	2.52%	0.48%	0.48%
ADI	B	1.26%	0.93%	0.93%
AMAT	C	1.85%	1.56%	1.56%
AVGO	B	4.46%	2.36%	2.36%
INTU	F	1.92%	1.01%	1.01%
MSFT	D	13.57%	6.68%	6.68%
MSI	A	0.85%	0.85%	0.85%
NOW	B	2.02%	1.83%	1.83%
NVDA	B	12.49%	6.63%	6.63%
TYL	D	0.28%	0.59%	0.28%

XLK Overweight 55 Positions Relative to ACIO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	A	3.02%
CRM	B	2.97%
AMD	C	2.93%
CSCO	A	2.4%
IBM	A	2.29%
QCOM	D	2.09%
TXN	C	2.08%
MU	D	1.26%
PANW	B	1.21%
LRCX	D	1.18%
KLAC	B	1.15%
ANET	A	1.11%
INTC	D	1.1%
APH	D	0.87%
SNPS	F	0.86%
PLTR	A	0.83%
CDNS	D	0.82%
CRWD	D	0.72%
NXPI	F	0.67%
ROP	D	0.66%
ADSK	B	0.65%
FTNT	A	0.55%
FICO	C	0.53%
MPWR	B	0.49%
MCHP	F	0.47%
IT	A	0.44%
CTSH	B	0.43%
GLW	C	0.39%
HPQ	B	0.38%
DELL	C	0.37%
ON	F	0.34%
CDW	D	0.33%
KEYS	B	0.31%
ANSS	D	0.31%
FSLR	C	0.29%
HPE	B	0.29%
NTAP	D	0.28%
STX	C	0.26%
WDC	C	0.25%
TER	C	0.24%
PTC	B	0.24%
GDDY	B	0.24%
TDY	A	0.23%
ZBRA	B	0.21%
VRSN	C	0.18%
GEN	A	0.17%
TRMB	B	0.17%
ENPH	F	0.17%
AKAM	D	0.17%
SWKS	F	0.17%
JBL	C	0.15%
FFIV	B	0.14%
JNPR	C	0.14%
EPAM	F	0.13%
QRVO	F	0.11%

XLK Underweight 62 Positions Relative to ACIO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AMZN	C	-3.69%
GOOG	B	-3.64%
META	A	-2.58%
XOM	A	-1.8%
LMT	A	-1.77%
JPM	C	-1.77%
CAT	A	-1.73%
SYK	C	-1.72%
BRK.A	B	-1.71%
PGR	B	-1.7%
V	B	-1.61%
LLY	D	-1.56%
TSLA	C	-1.47%
LIN	C	-1.41%
PG	D	-1.27%
UNH	B	-1.24%
LOW	C	-1.24%
TMO	D	-1.23%
PEP	F	-1.2%
BLK	A	-1.15%
WMT	A	-1.15%
NFLX	A	-1.1%
JNJ	D	-1.09%
TMUS	A	-1.08%
SO	A	-1.06%
MCD	A	-1.04%
COST	C	-1.02%
MAR	A	-1.0%
CSX	D	-0.99%
PLD	D	-0.95%
ELV	F	-0.94%
CTAS	C	-0.93%
MMC	D	-0.91%
PHM	C	-0.9%
MS	A	-0.9%
BAC	B	-0.89%
TJX	D	-0.87%
HON	C	-0.86%
FDX	F	-0.8%
ABT	C	-0.79%
NEE	C	-0.78%
MDLZ	D	-0.77%
MRK	F	-0.77%
FANG	D	-0.76%
ABBV	C	-0.74%
ICE	A	-0.73%
ISRG	C	-0.71%
DUK	C	-0.67%
DLR	C	-0.63%
DE	C	-0.59%
MO	D	-0.57%
EOG	B	-0.57%
ETN	B	-0.57%
C	B	-0.55%
PSA	C	-0.52%
VRTX	D	-0.47%
SHW	C	-0.44%
FCX	B	-0.4%
AMGN	D	-0.39%
CMCSA	B	-0.37%
ADP	A	-0.29%
HAL	D	-0.24%