XHS vs. WBIF ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares (WBIF)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$88.83

Average Daily Volume

8,362

Number of Holdings *

56

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
WBIF

WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares

WBIF Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation and the potential for current income, while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities of large capitalization domestic and foreign companies which WBI Investments, Inc., the sub-advisor to the fund and an affiliate of Millington Securities Inc., the advisor, believes display an attractive discount in a company's intrinsic value relative to its market price, and up to 20% of its net assets in other tactical investment opportunities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.06

Average Daily Volume

1,535

Number of Holdings *

25

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS WBIF
30 Days -4.31% -2.02%
60 Days -0.46% -0.13%
90 Days -2.04% -3.60%
12 Months -2.31% 2.76%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in WBIF Overlap
UHS C 2.22% 4.26% 2.22%
XHS Overweight 55 Positions Relative to WBIF
Symbol Grade Weight
PGNY D 2.31%
PDCO F 2.29%
ACHC F 2.27%
SEM A 2.26%
HQY B 2.23%
HCA C 2.22%
EHC B 2.22%
AMED A 2.21%
ENSG B 2.21%
RDNT B 2.2%
HUM C 2.2%
CHE D 2.2%
OPCH F 2.19%
MCK B 2.19%
PINC F 2.18%
ELV C 2.18%
DVA C 2.18%
THC C 2.18%
CI D 2.18%
CAH D 2.17%
DGX C 2.17%
RCM F 2.17%
MOH F 2.15%
PRVA D 2.14%
CNC D 2.13%
UNH D 2.13%
SGRY F 2.12%
HSIC D 2.12%
CVS D 2.11%
GH C 2.1%
AGL D 2.08%
AMN F 2.04%
HIMS C 1.84%
ADUS B 1.73%
BKD C 1.65%
OMI F 1.56%
NEO D 1.45%
CRVL B 1.15%
AHCO D 1.13%
LFST D 0.93%
USPH F 0.93%
OPK D 0.92%
MD F 0.85%
ASTH C 0.75%
ACCD F 0.74%
NHC A 0.73%
CCRN F 0.71%
PETQ B 0.67%
MODV F 0.65%
CSTL F 0.65%
ALHC B 0.6%
CYH D 0.6%
FLGT F 0.55%
PNTG B 0.49%
NRC F 0.26%
XHS Underweight 24 Positions Relative to WBIF
Symbol Grade Weight
LRCX B -5.51%
USHY A -5.04%
TW C -4.44%
BR B -4.28%
DKS C -4.24%
INTU A -4.21%
RGA C -4.09%
BX C -4.09%
AAPL A -4.02%
CRBG C -4.0%
CHD C -3.99%
HIG C -3.94%
FIX D -3.93%
ADP D -3.93%
VOYA D -3.9%
PHM D -3.89%
DECK C -3.81%
PAYX D -3.76%
META A -3.71%
QCOM B -3.5%
PANW B -2.98%
V C -2.59%
AFL B -1.02%
RJF D -0.93%
Compare ETFs