XHS vs. MNTL ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Tema Neuroscience and Mental Health ETF (MNTL)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$93.48

Average Daily Volume

4,000

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MNTL

Tema Neuroscience and Mental Health ETF

MNTL Description Under normal circumstances, the Tema Neuroscience and Mental Health ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in neuroscience and mental health companies. A company is generally considered to be a neuroscience or mental health company that derives at least 50% of revenues from neuroscience or neurology-related diseases, or mental health. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.19

Average Daily Volume

224

Number of Holdings *

37

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS MNTL
30 Days -1.03% -6.94%
60 Days -3.52% -7.28%
90 Days -5.40% -8.93%
12 Months 9.71%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in MNTL Overlap
ACHC F 1.05% 0.88% 0.88%
OPCH D 1.45% 0.96% 0.96%
XHS Overweight 56 Positions Relative to MNTL
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS C 2.63%
HQY A 2.56%
RDNT B 2.5%
MCK A 2.46%
GH B 2.36%
PINC B 2.35%
EHC B 2.27%
LH B 2.26%
CAH B 2.24%
SEM B 2.21%
DGX A 2.13%
RCM A 2.12%
COR B 2.12%
THC D 2.1%
PRVA C 2.1%
UNH B 2.09%
CHE D 2.05%
ENSG C 2.0%
CVS D 1.99%
DVA C 1.98%
HSIC C 1.98%
ADUS D 1.96%
AMED F 1.95%
PDCO F 1.87%
CI D 1.86%
HUM C 1.84%
HCA F 1.83%
UHS D 1.81%
MOH F 1.79%
USPH B 1.7%
SGRY F 1.67%
CRVL B 1.65%
CNC D 1.63%
ELV F 1.55%
BKD F 1.48%
OMI F 1.48%
NEO C 1.45%
MD C 1.41%
AHCO F 1.25%
CLOV D 1.25%
CSTL D 1.24%
LFST B 1.24%
PGNY F 1.21%
ALHC C 1.14%
AMN F 1.06%
NHC C 1.02%
ASTH F 1.01%
AGL F 1.01%
PNTG D 0.71%
ACCD D 0.64%
OPK C 0.64%
CYH F 0.63%
CCRN F 0.59%
MODV C 0.52%
FLGT F 0.42%
NRC F 0.31%
XHS Underweight 35 Positions Relative to MNTL
Symbol Grade Weight
VRTX D -8.52%
LLY F -4.89%
REGN F -4.53%
ALNY D -4.52%
ARGX B -4.48%
NBIX C -4.14%
CRNX C -3.88%
TEVA C -3.72%
BIIB F -3.57%
SYK B -3.08%
MDT D -2.9%
IONS F -2.66%
ITCI C -2.54%
DNLI D -2.26%
XENE D -2.25%
CPRX C -2.22%
RNA C -2.14%
DAWN D -2.1%
AXSM B -1.96%
SRPT F -1.88%
JAZZ C -1.81%
DXCM C -1.8%
ACAD C -1.61%
NTLA F -1.56%
ALKS C -1.47%
IMVT F -1.46%
PEN B -1.24%
PTCT B -1.18%
DYN F -1.17%
SRRK C -1.09%
PRTA F -1.03%
VYGR F -0.87%
ALEC F -0.67%
QTRX F -0.57%
ARVN F -0.46%
Compare ETFs