WBIF vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares (WBIF) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
WBIF

WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares

WBIF Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation and the potential for current income, while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities of large capitalization domestic and foreign companies which WBI Investments, Inc., the sub-advisor to the fund and an affiliate of Millington Securities Inc., the advisor, believes display an attractive discount in a company's intrinsic value relative to its market price, and up to 20% of its net assets in other tactical investment opportunities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.40

Average Daily Volume

1,099

Number of Holdings *

69

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.01

Average Daily Volume

5,177

Number of Holdings *

57

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period WBIF XHS
30 Days 2.05% -4.19%
60 Days 7.25% -0.63%
90 Days 1.34% 5.93%
12 Months 13.13% 15.56%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in WBIF Weight in XHS Overlap
CI D 3.16% 1.9% 1.9%
MCK F 1.48% 1.85% 1.48%
UHS D 3.05% 2.07% 2.07%
WBIF Overweight 66 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
BDX C 3.27%
DTE B 3.26%
UNM A 3.21%
VOYA A 3.21%
WRB C 3.2%
FIX A 3.12%
RGA B 3.09%
PRU B 2.99%
CMS A 2.98%
OXY D 2.89%
LRCX D 1.52%
AMAT C 1.5%
LEN C 1.48%
AXP A 1.48%
V B 1.47%
CSL A 1.47%
MPC D 1.46%
PHM C 1.45%
DHI C 1.44%
SLB D 1.43%
ADP A 1.43%
BYD B 1.39%
MLI B 1.38%
PAG D 1.37%
NXST D 1.35%
AME C 1.33%
PAYX B 1.32%
DKS D 1.31%
EXP C 1.29%
BR B 1.29%
PRI A 1.28%
RMD C 1.28%
OC C 1.28%
G A 1.27%
R C 1.26%
HRB C 1.22%
LPX C 1.22%
CASY D 1.22%
TXRH A 1.2%
KBR A 1.2%
FLTR A 0.77%
FALN B 0.77%
AGZD A 0.76%
DFS A 0.72%
FTSL A 0.7%
SYF A 0.57%
EG A 0.57%
ALSN A 0.57%
DOX B 0.56%
IPG D 0.56%
TOL C 0.56%
AVY D 0.56%
NEU F 0.55%
EQH B 0.55%
STIP B 0.55%
ALLE A 0.55%
TTC F 0.55%
GPI C 0.55%
DCI B 0.55%
CBT B 0.55%
SCI D 0.54%
THG A 0.54%
NOV F 0.53%
GL C 0.53%
AOS C 0.43%
BKLN A 0.32%
WBIF Underweight 54 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS C -2.14%
AGL F -2.12%
EHC C -2.09%
CHE D -2.09%
SGRY C -2.08%
HCA C -2.05%
THC D -2.04%
CVS D -2.04%
RDNT C -2.04%
ADUS D -2.03%
HQY B -2.02%
HSIC D -2.02%
DGX D -2.01%
AMED D -2.01%
RCM B -2.01%
DVA C -1.99%
PDCO F -1.97%
SEM D -1.96%
CNC F -1.96%
PINC F -1.96%
HUM F -1.95%
OPCH F -1.95%
CAH B -1.94%
ENSG D -1.94%
ACHC F -1.94%
UNH B -1.94%
MOH F -1.9%
ELV F -1.89%
OMI F -1.82%
AMN F -1.81%
BKD F -1.73%
GH F -1.7%
PRVA F -1.67%
USPH F -1.52%
CRVL C -1.47%
PGNY F -1.39%
ASTH B -1.3%
NEO F -1.29%
AHCO D -1.23%
PETQ A -1.16%
LFST C -1.15%
CLOV B -1.12%
CSTL B -1.08%
MD B -1.04%
NHC D -0.96%
ALHC C -0.95%
CYH C -0.92%
CCRN F -0.8%
PNTG C -0.74%
ACCD F -0.66%
OPK D -0.57%
FLGT F -0.47%
MODV F -0.37%
NRC F -0.35%
Compare ETFs