SPAM vs. PSCH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio (PSCH)

SPAM

Themes Cybersecurity ETF

SPAM Description

The index is designed to provide exposure to companies that have business operations in the cybersecurity industry. The fund will invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that comprise the index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.73

Average Daily Volume

483

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSCH

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio

PSCH Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Capped Health Care Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks in the health care sector. Included are healthcare companies principally engaged in the business of providing healthcare-related products and services, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical technology and supplies, and facilities. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.15

Average Daily Volume

10,603

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SPAM	PSCH
30 Days	1.41%	-2.39%
60 Days	0.38%	-6.20%
90 Days	10.80%	-2.02%
12 Months		25.35%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in SPAM	Weight in PSCH	Overlap

SPAM Overweight 22 Positions Relative to PSCH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FTNT	B	5.85%
YOU	A	5.81%
S	B	5.64%
CACI	A	5.54%
VRNS	D	5.35%
CHKP	F	5.29%
BAH	A	5.18%
PANW	B	4.65%
CYBR	C	4.59%
RPD	C	4.48%
TENB	D	4.19%
ZS	C	4.1%
QLYS	F	3.76%
ALRM	F	3.65%
CRWD	C	3.51%
OKTA	D	3.42%
ATEN	A	2.01%
FSLY	D	1.79%
RDWR	C	1.53%
APLD	C	1.49%
OSPN	B	1.0%
CHGX	B	0.49%

SPAM Underweight 69 Positions Relative to PSCH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GKOS	B	-4.85%
INSP	D	-3.9%
MMSI	B	-3.77%
ALKS	F	-3.12%
CORT	B	-3.04%
OGN	D	-3.01%
RDNT	D	-2.99%
KRYS	C	-2.97%
ICUI	C	-2.95%
ITGR	D	-2.88%
HIMS	B	-2.76%
TMDX	F	-2.69%
ADMA	B	-2.49%
PBH	A	-2.43%
SEM	B	-2.34%
TGTX	A	-2.1%
CRVL	D	-1.88%
PTGX	B	-1.87%
CPRX	A	-1.62%
ADUS	D	-1.57%
ASTH	C	-1.54%
NARI	A	-1.5%
TNDM	F	-1.43%
PINC	A	-1.42%
VCEL	D	-1.41%
UFPT	D	-1.39%
MYGN	F	-1.38%
LGND	A	-1.33%
CNMD	D	-1.3%
AMPH	A	-1.29%
SUPN	B	-1.27%
OMCL	B	-1.25%
PRVA	B	-1.22%
LMAT	B	-1.21%
NEO	D	-1.14%
FTRE	F	-1.13%
PDCO	F	-1.13%
AMN	F	-1.02%
STAA	F	-1.01%
NHC	C	-1.0%
DVAX	A	-0.9%
XNCR	A	-0.89%
IART	C	-0.87%
PGNY	F	-0.85%
USPH	F	-0.84%
COLL	F	-0.79%
CERT	F	-0.78%
AHCO	D	-0.76%
INVA	C	-0.74%
MD	A	-0.72%
HRMY	D	-0.7%
AVNS	F	-0.7%
AORT	A	-0.69%
SDGR	F	-0.68%
ANIP	F	-0.67%
OMI	F	-0.66%
RCUS	F	-0.64%
EMBC	C	-0.55%
BLFS	B	-0.54%
PCRX	C	-0.54%
HSTM	A	-0.47%
VIR	B	-0.47%
MLAB	D	-0.44%
IRWD	F	-0.38%
SLP	F	-0.37%
CTKB	F	-0.35%
PAHC	B	-0.33%
RGNX	F	-0.3%
FLGT	C	-0.26%