RWO vs. DBND ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR DJ Wilshire Global Real Estate ETF (RWO) to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND)

RWO

SPDR DJ Wilshire Global Real Estate ETF

RWO Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the Dow Jones Global Select Real Estate Securities Indexsm. It invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a float-adjusted market capitalization index designed to measure the performance of publicly traded global real estate securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.12

Average Daily Volume

125,202

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

DBND

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF

DBND Description

Under normal circumstances, the Advisor intends to invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in fixed income instruments or other investments with economic characteristics similar to fixed income instruments. It may invest in fixed income instruments of any credit quality, including those that are at the time of investment unrated or rated BB+ or lower by S&P or Ba1 or lower by Moody?s or the equivalent by any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$47.41

Average Daily Volume

37,941

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RWO	DBND
30 Days	6.39%	1.51%
60 Days	10.49%	4.00%
90 Days	17.08%	4.82%
12 Months	23.35%	10.03%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RWO	Weight in DBND	Overlap
	PK	D	0.19%	0.18%	0.18%

RWO Overweight 97 Positions Relative to DBND

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PLD	C	7.85%
EQIX	C	5.34%
WELL	C	4.99%
PSA	B	3.69%
O	C	3.54%
SPG	B	3.45%
DLR	B	3.33%
EXR	B	2.42%
AVB	B	2.12%
EQR	B	1.72%
VTR	C	1.71%
INVH	C	1.34%
ESS	B	1.28%
MAA	B	1.25%
ARE	C	1.23%
SUI	B	1.15%
KIM	C	1.02%
DOC	C	1.01%
ELS	C	0.91%
UDR	C	0.9%
WPC	C	0.88%
CPT	B	0.85%
AMH	C	0.84%
REG	C	0.79%
CUBE	C	0.78%
HST	C	0.77%
BXP	B	0.72%
REXR	C	0.71%
OHI	B	0.64%
NNN	C	0.58%
EGP	B	0.57%
FRT	C	0.56%
BRX	B	0.53%
COLD	D	0.5%
ADC	C	0.49%
FR	B	0.47%
STAG	C	0.46%
TRNO	C	0.43%
RHP	C	0.39%
KRG	B	0.37%
EPRT	B	0.36%
VNO	C	0.35%
PECO	B	0.3%
IRT	B	0.3%
CTRE	C	0.28%
SLG	C	0.28%
CUZ	B	0.28%
KRC	C	0.24%
IIPR	B	0.23%
NHI	C	0.23%
EPR	B	0.23%
SKT	B	0.22%
HIW	B	0.22%
MAC	B	0.22%
BNL	B	0.22%
APLE	D	0.21%
NSA	B	0.21%
MPW	C	0.19%
LXP	B	0.19%
FCPT	C	0.18%
DEI	B	0.17%
UE	B	0.16%
AKR	B	0.15%
EQC	C	0.14%
ROIC	C	0.13%
DBRG	D	0.13%
SHO	C	0.13%
GNL	C	0.11%
DRH	C	0.11%
JBGS	C	0.1%
PEB	D	0.1%
GTY	B	0.1%
ESRT	B	0.09%
UMH	C	0.09%
XHR	B	0.09%
DEA	B	0.09%
RLJ	D	0.09%
PDM	B	0.08%
AIV	B	0.08%
NTST	D	0.08%
AAT	B	0.08%
KW	C	0.08%
NXRT	C	0.07%
CSR	B	0.07%
PLYM	D	0.06%
BDN	B	0.06%
DHC	B	0.05%
SVC	D	0.05%
PGRE	C	0.05%
UHT	B	0.04%
GMRE	C	0.04%
HPP	D	0.04%
INN	B	0.04%
CLDT	D	0.03%
CHCT	F	0.02%
OPI	F	0.01%
SRG	D	0.01%

RWO Underweight 52 Positions Relative to DBND

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UPST	C	-1.79%
COMM	B	-0.77%
BNS	B	-0.68%
GS	C	-0.66%
JPM	D	-0.62%
ABBV	C	-0.61%
DLTR	F	-0.59%
BAC	D	-0.56%
DFS	C	-0.49%
T	C	-0.48%
CVS	D	-0.42%
CCI	C	-0.38%
BMO	C	-0.38%
MAR	C	-0.38%
CMCSA	D	-0.38%
OC	D	-0.37%
NTAP	D	-0.37%
SO	B	-0.36%
BA	F	-0.35%
KMI	B	-0.35%
ARCC	B	-0.35%
MO	C	-0.34%
DKS	D	-0.34%
GM	C	-0.34%
SYY	D	-0.33%
RPRX	C	-0.32%
EXPE	C	-0.3%
ORCL	C	-0.3%
WTW	C	-0.29%
HCA	B	-0.29%
CCL	C	-0.26%
AAL	D	-0.19%
COTY	F	-0.19%
PENN	D	-0.19%
PFGC	B	-0.19%
POST	C	-0.18%
GFF	D	-0.18%
MODV	F	-0.18%
SPH	F	-0.18%
UAL	C	-0.18%
PCG	C	-0.18%
NRG	C	-0.17%
VSCO	C	-0.17%
CHTR	D	-0.17%
CACC	F	-0.16%
UBER	C	-0.16%
BALY	B	-0.16%
SSP	F	-0.16%
OMI	D	-0.16%
OMF	D	-0.16%
GPOR	D	-0.16%
EXC	C	-0.09%