ROM vs. LCDS ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) to JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS)

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROM Description

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. TechnologySM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the technology sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, those involved in computers and office equipment, software, communications technology, semiconductors, diversified technology services and Internet services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.81

Average Daily Volume

35,837

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

LCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large, well established companies. Many of the equity securities in the fund"s portfolio will be technology companies or companies that rely heavily on technological advances. In managing the fund, the adviser employs a fundamental data science enabled investment approach that combines research, data insights, and risk management. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.58

Average Daily Volume

109

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ROM	LCDS
30 Days	3.58%	2.99%
60 Days	8.67%	5.00%
90 Days	6.06%	6.45%
12 Months	44.73%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in ROM	Weight in LCDS	Overlap
AAPL	C	10.41%	5.88%	5.88%
APH	A	0.67%	0.68%	0.67%
AVGO	D	3.08%	1.31%	1.31%
CRM	B	2.5%	1.25%	1.25%
CTSH	B	0.3%	0.48%	0.3%
FICO	B	0.44%	0.71%	0.44%
HPE	B	0.22%	0.58%	0.22%
INTU	C	1.53%	0.88%	0.88%
LRCX	F	0.72%	0.22%	0.22%
MSFT	F	9.39%	7.47%	7.47%
MSI	B	0.65%	0.21%	0.21%
MU	D	0.85%	0.87%	0.85%
NVDA	C	10.63%	7.58%	7.58%
NXPI	D	0.44%	0.93%	0.44%
SNPS	B	0.63%	0.32%	0.32%
STX	D	0.16%	0.7%	0.16%

ROM Overweight 52 Positions Relative to LCDS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	B	2.33%
CSCO	B	1.84%
ADBE	C	1.77%
ACN	C	1.76%
AMD	F	1.73%
NOW	A	1.65%
IBM	C	1.5%
TXN	C	1.46%
QCOM	F	1.42%
AMAT	F	1.11%
PLTR	B	1.05%
PANW	C	0.99%
INTC	D	0.82%
ADI	D	0.81%
ANET	C	0.77%
KLAC	D	0.66%
CDNS	B	0.63%
CRWD	B	0.62%
ADSK	A	0.51%
ROP	B	0.47%
FTNT	C	0.47%
IT	C	0.32%
DELL	C	0.3%
HPQ	B	0.29%
GLW	B	0.28%
MCHP	D	0.27%
ANSS	B	0.23%
ON	D	0.22%
MPWR	F	0.22%
KEYS	A	0.21%
TYL	B	0.2%
GDDY	A	0.2%
CDW	F	0.19%
NTAP	C	0.19%
PTC	A	0.18%
TDY	B	0.17%
ZBRA	B	0.16%
FSLR	F	0.16%
WDC	D	0.16%
TRMB	B	0.14%
GEN	B	0.13%
TER	D	0.13%
JBL	B	0.12%
VRSN	F	0.12%
AKAM	D	0.11%
SWKS	F	0.11%
EPAM	C	0.11%
FFIV	B	0.11%
JNPR	F	0.1%
SMCI	F	0.07%
ENPH	F	0.06%
QRVO	F	0.05%

ROM Underweight 71 Positions Relative to LCDS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AMZN	C	-4.7%
META	D	-3.39%
GOOGL	C	-3.04%
WFC	A	-2.44%
UNH	C	-2.16%
MA	C	-1.98%
XOM	B	-1.79%
ABBV	D	-1.51%
BMY	B	-1.47%
SYK	C	-1.47%
AXP	A	-1.46%
PM	B	-1.45%
BAC	A	-1.34%
LOW	D	-1.33%
TT	A	-1.32%
CMCSA	B	-1.24%
UPS	C	-1.22%
HWM	A	-1.15%
TSLA	B	-1.14%
EOG	A	-1.14%
AMP	A	-1.13%
HON	B	-1.12%
LLY	F	-1.11%
CSX	B	-1.1%
PGR	A	-1.02%
COP	C	-1.02%
MDLZ	F	-0.99%
MET	A	-0.91%
REGN	F	-0.89%
NOC	D	-0.87%
SO	D	-0.87%
MCD	D	-0.87%
CME	A	-0.76%
DHR	F	-0.76%
BRK.A	B	-0.75%
SQ	B	-0.75%
NEE	D	-0.73%
KO	D	-0.73%
DOV	A	-0.71%
DD	D	-0.71%
DLR	B	-0.7%
TMUS	B	-0.69%
PCG	A	-0.69%
MS	A	-0.66%
MDT	D	-0.66%
AXTA	A	-0.66%
TFC	A	-0.64%
HLT	A	-0.63%
SPOT	B	-0.62%
PLD	D	-0.61%
CI	F	-0.6%
CMS	C	-0.59%
CMG	B	-0.55%
DE	A	-0.54%
AZO	C	-0.54%
LDOS	C	-0.53%
TJX	A	-0.53%
PFGC	B	-0.47%
VRTX	F	-0.45%
FCNCA	A	-0.41%
ELAN	D	-0.39%
WEX	D	-0.38%
BJ	A	-0.36%
MTG	C	-0.35%
COST	B	-0.34%
CHD	B	-0.3%
EQIX	A	-0.25%
SBUX	A	-0.14%
LIN	D	-0.13%
APTV	D	-0.11%
EL	F	-0.1%