RNEW vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF (RNEW) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

RNEW

VanEck Green Infrastructure ETF

RNEW Description

The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities of Green Infrastructure Companies. The index is a U.S. index that tracks the performance of Green Infrastructure Companies. "Green Infrastructure Companies" are companies that seek to positively impact the environment through the production, transmission, or distribution of green energy and/or through the establishment of sustainable infrastructure to facilitate the use of green energy. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.29

Average Daily Volume

132

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$175.23

Average Daily Volume

18,897

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RNEW	PRN
30 Days	4.52%	9.86%
60 Days	1.13%	16.00%
90 Days	-0.95%	21.81%
12 Months	12.92%	62.90%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RNEW	Weight in PRN	Overlap
CLH	C	6.0%	1.5%	1.5%
PWR	A	6.03%	3.83%	3.83%
RSG	A	5.71%	2.04%	2.04%

RNEW Overweight 36 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSLA	B	9.97%
LNG	A	6.86%
WM	B	5.62%
ECL	D	5.24%
DCI	B	4.93%
RIVN	F	4.73%
BWA	D	4.14%
FSLR	F	3.26%
CWST	A	3.22%
IDA	A	3.11%
ITRI	C	2.99%
SWX	B	2.9%
LCID	F	2.83%
ORA	B	2.65%
ENPH	F	2.39%
NWE	B	1.77%
BE	B	1.62%
CWEN	C	1.21%
RUN	F	1.19%
NFE	D	1.05%
NEP	F	0.85%
PLUG	F	0.77%
SPH	C	0.63%
ERII	D	0.6%
ARRY	F	0.53%
SHLS	F	0.52%
AMRC	F	0.52%
REX	D	0.45%
MNTK	F	0.4%
MEG	F	0.39%
GPRE	F	0.38%
CLNE	F	0.36%
AMPS	C	0.29%
CHPT	F	0.27%
NOVA	F	0.23%
SES	F	0.06%

RNEW Underweight 37 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SMR	B	-5.12%
FIX	A	-4.0%
WSO	A	-3.68%
GWW	B	-3.68%
HEI	A	-3.58%
PH	A	-3.52%
AXON	A	-3.45%
TT	A	-3.33%
CTAS	B	-3.17%
HWM	A	-3.08%
URI	C	-3.08%
PKG	A	-2.88%
STRL	A	-2.85%
FI	A	-2.85%
CSL	C	-2.43%
IRM	C	-2.41%
TDG	D	-2.31%
CSWI	B	-2.25%
DY	D	-2.16%
EXP	B	-2.01%
GE	D	-2.0%
CARR	C	-1.98%
MLI	B	-1.96%
GVA	A	-1.94%
BAH	F	-1.83%
LMB	B	-1.81%
AIT	B	-1.78%
ROAD	B	-1.71%
KAI	B	-1.63%
TTEK	F	-1.49%
ITT	A	-1.45%
TPC	C	-1.45%
VSEC	C	-1.44%
UFPI	C	-1.4%
CECO	B	-1.33%
RUSHA	C	-1.32%
FWRD	D	-1.31%