RFG vs. IAK ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$51.79

Average Daily Volume

16,526

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

IAK

iShares U.S. Insurance ETF

IAK Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the insurance sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the insurance sector of the U.S. equity market. The underlying index may include large-, mid- or small-capitalization companies, and components primarily include financial and insurance companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$134.89

Average Daily Volume

63,391

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	IAK
30 Days	6.29%	2.97%
60 Days	5.48%	4.45%
90 Days	4.97%	8.45%
12 Months	32.54%	38.87%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in IAK	Overlap
	KNSL	B	1.6%	1.24%	1.24%
	PRI	B	1.06%	1.19%	1.06%

RFG Overweight 84 Positions Relative to IAK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	3.65%
DUOL	A	3.18%
FIX	A	2.75%
AAON	B	2.56%
RYAN	A	2.28%
TOL	B	2.15%
EME	A	2.07%
MUSA	B	1.84%
APPF	B	1.67%
PR	B	1.67%
OC	A	1.65%
BLD	D	1.64%
H	B	1.61%
CLH	C	1.56%
EXP	B	1.55%
WING	D	1.5%
MEDP	D	1.41%
WFRD	D	1.4%
ELF	C	1.38%
LNTH	D	1.31%
TXRH	B	1.31%
DT	D	1.29%
ANF	F	1.27%
RS	B	1.25%
RRC	B	1.25%
EXEL	B	1.24%
SSD	F	1.24%
PK	C	1.22%
FN	C	1.22%
CHDN	B	1.21%
LII	A	1.17%
SAIA	B	1.16%
VVV	D	1.16%
NVT	B	1.13%
OVV	B	1.13%
RMBS	B	1.11%
CASY	A	1.11%
AIT	B	1.1%
ESAB	C	1.09%
ONTO	F	1.09%
UFPI	C	1.08%
MANH	D	1.05%
COKE	C	1.05%
RBA	A	1.02%
GTLS	A	1.02%
TPX	B	0.98%
LOPE	C	0.97%
WSM	C	0.96%
CHRD	D	0.94%
NEU	D	0.94%
FND	D	0.93%
PLNT	A	0.93%
VAL	F	0.92%
SKX	D	0.91%
WSO	A	0.89%
ALTR	B	0.89%
CR	A	0.88%
WLK	D	0.83%
MTDR	B	0.83%
RBC	A	0.82%
CELH	F	0.79%
HLNE	B	0.79%
PSTG	D	0.79%
OLED	F	0.78%
CIVI	D	0.77%
CROX	D	0.76%
QLYS	B	0.75%
LECO	C	0.75%
TREX	C	0.69%
LNW	F	0.67%
PEN	B	0.66%
VNT	C	0.66%
ENSG	C	0.62%
WMS	F	0.62%
BCO	F	0.6%
DBX	B	0.59%
BYD	B	0.58%
HALO	F	0.55%
ARWR	D	0.52%
CAR	C	0.45%
FCN	F	0.44%
ACHC	F	0.35%
FIVE	F	0.34%
COTY	F	0.34%

RFG Underweight 50 Positions Relative to IAK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PGR	A	-16.35%
CB	C	-11.69%
TRV	B	-6.34%
AFL	B	-6.0%
MET	A	-4.7%
PRU	A	-4.66%
ALL	A	-4.52%
AIG	B	-4.47%
HIG	B	-4.02%
ACGL	C	-3.88%
CINF	A	-2.76%
MKL	A	-2.61%
PFG	D	-2.17%
WRB	A	-2.12%
FNF	B	-1.82%
L	A	-1.78%
UNM	A	-1.42%
AIZ	A	-1.32%
AFG	A	-1.21%
ERIE	D	-1.2%
GL	C	-1.16%
ORI	A	-1.05%
RLI	A	-0.87%
FAF	A	-0.79%
AXS	A	-0.78%
SIGI	C	-0.72%
THG	A	-0.7%
LNC	C	-0.6%
WTM	A	-0.58%
AGO	B	-0.54%
KMPR	A	-0.51%
CNO	B	-0.49%
BHF	C	-0.37%
OSCR	D	-0.36%
GNW	A	-0.35%
PLMR	A	-0.33%
STC	B	-0.24%
MCY	A	-0.24%
TRUP	B	-0.21%
LMND	B	-0.21%
HMN	B	-0.2%
SKWD	A	-0.2%
EIG	B	-0.16%
SAFT	B	-0.16%
CNA	C	-0.14%
AMSF	B	-0.14%
PRA	C	-0.1%
AMBC	C	-0.08%
UFCS	A	-0.06%
JRVR	F	-0.03%