RFG vs. BEDZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ)
RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.61

Average Daily Volume

17,043

Number of Holdings *

86

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.40

Average Daily Volume

295

Number of Holdings *

23

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RFG BEDZ
30 Days 8.80% 10.81%
60 Days 6.30% 12.73%
90 Days 6.63% 18.99%
12 Months 34.64% 28.68%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RFG Weight in BEDZ Overlap
BYD C 0.58% 4.15% 0.58%
H B 1.61% 2.22% 1.61%
PK B 1.22% 4.05% 1.22%
RFG Overweight 83 Positions Relative to BEDZ
Symbol Grade Weight
CNX A 3.65%
DUOL A 3.18%
FIX A 2.75%
AAON B 2.56%
RYAN B 2.28%
TOL B 2.15%
EME C 2.07%
MUSA A 1.84%
APPF B 1.67%
PR B 1.67%
OC A 1.65%
BLD D 1.64%
KNSL B 1.6%
CLH B 1.56%
EXP A 1.55%
WING D 1.5%
MEDP D 1.41%
WFRD D 1.4%
ELF C 1.38%
LNTH D 1.31%
TXRH C 1.31%
DT C 1.29%
ANF C 1.27%
RS B 1.25%
RRC B 1.25%
EXEL B 1.24%
SSD D 1.24%
FN D 1.22%
CHDN B 1.21%
LII A 1.17%
SAIA B 1.16%
VVV F 1.16%
NVT B 1.13%
OVV B 1.13%
RMBS C 1.11%
CASY A 1.11%
AIT A 1.1%
ESAB B 1.09%
ONTO D 1.09%
UFPI B 1.08%
PRI A 1.06%
MANH D 1.05%
COKE C 1.05%
RBA A 1.02%
GTLS B 1.02%
TPX B 0.98%
LOPE B 0.97%
WSM B 0.96%
CHRD D 0.94%
NEU C 0.94%
FND C 0.93%
PLNT A 0.93%
VAL D 0.92%
SKX D 0.91%
WSO A 0.89%
ALTR B 0.89%
CR A 0.88%
WLK D 0.83%
MTDR B 0.83%
RBC A 0.82%
CELH F 0.79%
HLNE B 0.79%
PSTG D 0.79%
OLED D 0.78%
CIVI D 0.77%
CROX D 0.76%
QLYS C 0.75%
LECO B 0.75%
TREX C 0.69%
LNW D 0.67%
PEN B 0.66%
VNT B 0.66%
ENSG D 0.62%
WMS D 0.62%
BCO D 0.6%
DBX B 0.59%
HALO F 0.55%
ARWR F 0.52%
CAR C 0.45%
FCN D 0.44%
ACHC F 0.35%
FIVE F 0.34%
COTY F 0.34%
RFG Underweight 20 Positions Relative to BEDZ
Symbol Grade Weight
NCLH B -6.06%
RCL A -5.88%
CCL B -5.52%
EXPE B -5.36%
BKNG A -5.27%
TH C -5.12%
MCRI A -4.63%
TCOM B -4.53%
RHP B -4.52%
PEB D -4.25%
MAR B -4.17%
WH B -4.04%
INN D -3.99%
VICI C -3.78%
HST C -3.63%
APLE B -3.32%
HLT A -2.89%
IHG A -2.7%
XHR B -2.68%
GLPI C -2.55%
Compare ETFs