REGL vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
REGL

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

REGL Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400® Dividend Aristocrats Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index includes all companies meeting these requirements and includes a minimum of 40 stocks, each of which is equally weighted. No single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index's weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$82.34

Average Daily Volume

39,965

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$97.91

Average Daily Volume

5,614

Number of Holdings *

56

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period REGL XHS
30 Days 4.60% 2.07%
60 Days 5.85% 4.81%
90 Days 12.07% 7.54%
12 Months 22.77% 16.31%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in REGL Weight in XHS Overlap
CHE C 2.09% 2.16% 2.09%
REGL Overweight 48 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
ERIE B 2.64%
ELS C 2.3%
RNR C 2.29%
THG B 2.22%
ORI B 2.17%
SLGN B 2.16%
PII D 2.16%
AFG B 2.15%
RPM B 2.15%
NNN C 2.15%
NFG B 2.14%
RLI B 2.13%
OGE C 2.13%
SON C 2.12%
UMBF B 2.12%
ATR B 2.11%
NWE B 2.09%
FLO C 2.09%
RRX C 2.06%
BKH B 2.06%
R A 2.06%
OGS B 2.06%
GGG C 2.04%
NJR B 2.03%
PB B 2.03%
SEIC C 2.02%
POR C 2.02%
UNM B 2.01%
CASY D 2.01%
RGLD C 2.0%
EVR A 1.98%
UBSI B 1.97%
CSL B 1.96%
DCI C 1.96%
SR B 1.96%
WLK D 1.94%
UGI C 1.94%
PRGO D 1.93%
WTRG D 1.92%
CBSH C 1.92%
SWX C 1.9%
LANC D 1.9%
CFR C 1.87%
LECO F 1.8%
MSA D 1.8%
WSM D 1.79%
OZK D 1.76%
TTC D 1.74%
REGL Underweight 55 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
ENSG B -2.61%
UHS B -2.52%
SGRY C -2.45%
UNH C -2.42%
ACHC C -2.42%
HCA B -2.37%
MOH D -2.35%
RDNT B -2.35%
THC A -2.34%
OPCH C -2.33%
RCM C -2.3%
CAH C -2.29%
DGX B -2.29%
DVA B -2.28%
EHC C -2.25%
CNC D -2.22%
CI C -2.22%
PINC C -2.2%
PRVA F -2.2%
AMED C -2.16%
HSIC C -2.12%
ELV C -2.09%
SEM D -2.09%
CVS D -1.95%
PDCO F -1.91%
HQY C -1.9%
HUM F -1.85%
ADUS B -1.82%
MCK F -1.77%
PGNY F -1.76%
GH D -1.73%
NEO C -1.65%
AMN F -1.61%
OMI D -1.53%
BKD D -1.52%
HIMS D -1.36%
CRVL B -1.3%
LFST C -1.24%
MD C -1.19%
AHCO C -1.16%
OPK C -1.06%
CYH B -0.99%
AGL F -0.98%
ASTH B -0.89%
CSTL C -0.88%
PETQ B -0.87%
ALHC C -0.83%
NHC D -0.79%
USPH F -0.78%
PNTG B -0.68%
CCRN F -0.66%
FLGT D -0.56%
ACCD D -0.43%
MODV F -0.31%
NRC F -0.23%
Compare ETFs