RDIV vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of RevenueShares Ultra Dividend Fund (RDIV) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)

RDIV

RevenueShares Ultra Dividend Fund

RDIV Description

The investment seeks to outperform the total return performance of the S&P 900Â® Index, the fund's benchmark index (the "benchmark index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets in the securities of companies included in the benchmark index. The index is constructed by identifying the top 60 securities from the benchmark index with the highest average of the 1-year trailing dividend yields for the current quarter and each of the past three quarters, which are then re-weighted according to the revenue earned by the companies, subject to certain asset diversification requirements and a maximum 5% per company weighting. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.23

Average Daily Volume

32,510

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$64.83

Average Daily Volume

30,461

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RDIV	XMLV
30 Days	3.73%	5.64%
60 Days	5.45%	6.68%
90 Days	7.80%	9.27%
12 Months	39.99%	30.39%

13 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RDIV	Weight in XMLV	Overlap
ADC	B	0.11%	1.29%	0.11%
ALE	A	0.29%	1.15%	0.29%
BKH	A	0.42%	1.13%	0.42%
BRX	A	0.25%	1.17%	0.25%
CDP	C	0.13%	1.08%	0.13%
DTM	B	0.21%	1.87%	0.21%
FLO	D	0.96%	1.11%	0.96%
JHG	A	0.49%	1.39%	0.49%
NNN	D	0.15%	1.09%	0.15%
NWE	B	0.28%	1.22%	0.28%
OGE	B	0.56%	1.34%	0.56%
POR	C	0.54%	1.1%	0.54%
SR	A	0.52%	1.21%	0.52%

RDIV Overweight 47 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BMY	B	5.27%
CVX	A	5.25%
USB	A	5.13%
PRU	A	5.02%
F	C	4.9%
PM	B	4.87%
DUK	C	4.69%
BBY	D	4.65%
KHC	F	4.36%
IP	B	4.21%
EXC	C	4.19%
VTRS	A	3.29%
CFG	B	2.66%
HBAN	A	2.54%
ETR	B	2.5%
AMCR	D	2.39%
FE	C	2.38%
WMB	A	2.15%
CAG	D	2.07%
ES	D	2.01%
RF	A	1.95%
IPG	D	1.92%
BEN	C	1.7%
TROW	B	1.38%
SPG	B	1.16%
FHN	A	1.13%
EVRG	A	1.12%
CC	C	1.12%
IVZ	B	1.09%
PNW	B	0.95%
TNL	A	0.82%
HAS	D	0.81%
EXR	D	0.59%
EQR	B	0.54%
PK	B	0.52%
ASB	B	0.48%
CRI	D	0.44%
MAA	B	0.42%
LAMR	D	0.39%
KIM	A	0.38%
UBSI	B	0.34%
REG	B	0.28%
FRT	B	0.22%
CUBE	D	0.2%
PCH	D	0.2%
KRG	B	0.16%
CUZ	B	0.15%

RDIV Underweight 66 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SEIC	B	-1.8%
ATR	B	-1.8%
CW	B	-1.78%
IBKR	A	-1.61%
SF	B	-1.6%
FHI	A	-1.55%
VOYA	B	-1.52%
INGR	B	-1.49%
IDA	A	-1.47%
UNM	A	-1.46%
HLI	B	-1.45%
THG	A	-1.45%
ORI	A	-1.44%
PNM	F	-1.44%
EHC	B	-1.44%
RGA	A	-1.43%
DCI	B	-1.41%
JEF	A	-1.41%
G	B	-1.4%
RLI	B	-1.4%
CACI	D	-1.39%
FLS	B	-1.39%
AM	A	-1.35%
PRI	A	-1.33%
AFG	A	-1.32%
RPM	A	-1.32%
GGG	B	-1.32%
USFD	A	-1.31%
ACM	A	-1.28%
NJR	A	-1.28%
AMG	B	-1.28%
TXRH	C	-1.25%
GLPI	C	-1.23%
SON	D	-1.22%
PPC	C	-1.22%
GNTX	C	-1.22%
OHI	C	-1.21%
ELS	C	-1.2%
GEF	A	-1.2%
AMH	D	-1.19%
POST	C	-1.19%
EPR	D	-1.18%
CHE	D	-1.17%
GATX	A	-1.16%
NFG	A	-1.16%
SLGN	A	-1.16%
OGS	A	-1.14%
LSTR	D	-1.13%
SBRA	C	-1.13%
MTG	C	-1.13%
SNX	C	-1.11%
EGP	F	-1.09%
ESNT	D	-1.09%
AVT	C	-1.08%
FR	C	-1.07%
MUSA	A	-1.07%
MSA	D	-1.07%
NEU	C	-1.04%
STAG	F	-1.04%
NYT	C	-1.03%
DLB	B	-1.01%
KBR	F	-0.99%
WTRG	B	-0.98%
MMS	F	-0.97%
MAN	D	-0.92%
CHRD	D	-0.87%