QQQG vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

QQQG

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

QQQG Description

The initial Index universe is typically derived from the component companies of the Nasdaq-100 Index®. The initial universe of companies is typically screened based on their average projected free cash flows and earnings (if available) over each of the next two fiscal years. Under normal circumstances, the fund will seek to invest at least 80% of the fund"s total assets in growth securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.90

Average Daily Volume

3,106

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$155.83

Average Daily Volume

20,777

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQQG	PRN
30 Days	1.29%	1.76%
60 Days	0.84%	7.33%
90 Days		16.70%
12 Months		55.77%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQQG	Weight in PRN	Overlap
	CTAS	B	3.63%	3.3%	3.3%

QQQG Overweight 49 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	B	5.94%
TTD	B	5.15%
AVGO	B	4.87%
KLAC	F	4.02%
FANG	F	3.52%
AMAT	F	3.5%
META	B	3.33%
NXPI	C	3.13%
QCOM	D	3.04%
ADI	C	3.03%
AAPL	C	2.94%
GOOGL	A	2.88%
NFLX	A	2.55%
DASH	A	2.15%
BKNG	A	2.07%
REGN	F	2.03%
LRCX	F	2.01%
EA	A	1.89%
ADP	A	1.89%
CPRT	D	1.87%
VRSK	B	1.84%
PAYX	B	1.77%
MRVL	A	1.66%
MSFT	D	1.65%
AMGN	C	1.54%
SNPS	B	1.52%
MCHP	F	1.51%
ADSK	B	1.42%
ROP	D	1.36%
INTU	D	1.36%
CSCO	B	1.33%
GILD	A	1.28%
MELI	A	1.27%
FTNT	B	1.27%
PANW	B	1.26%
CSX	F	1.16%
ABNB	B	1.14%
ANSS	C	1.14%
DDOG	B	1.12%
MNST	C	1.03%
CDNS	C	0.98%
IDXX	F	0.95%
CRWD	C	0.93%
ADBE	F	0.82%
WDAY	F	0.76%
TEAM	A	0.75%
ZS	C	0.69%
LULU	C	0.56%
DXCM	C	0.45%

QQQG Underweight 39 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FIX	B	-3.95%
PWR	B	-3.9%
SMR	B	-3.72%
GWW	A	-3.66%
HEI	D	-3.62%
WSO	D	-3.6%
TT	C	-3.44%
PH	A	-3.42%
URI	B	-3.29%
PKG	A	-2.96%
HWM	B	-2.95%
FI	A	-2.94%
IRM	B	-2.84%
AXON	B	-2.75%
CSL	C	-2.73%
TDG	C	-2.67%
STRL	B	-2.53%
BAH	A	-2.34%
DY	C	-2.32%
GE	D	-2.18%
CSWI	B	-2.16%
RSG	D	-2.12%
CARR	D	-2.1%
EXP	B	-2.09%
MLI	A	-1.91%
TTEK	B	-1.89%
GVA	A	-1.8%
CLH	C	-1.69%
LMB	B	-1.68%
AIT	A	-1.67%
ROAD	B	-1.62%
FWRD	C	-1.56%
UFPI	C	-1.53%
ITT	C	-1.46%
KAI	A	-1.4%
TPC	B	-1.39%
VSEC	A	-1.38%
CECO	F	-1.34%
RUSHA	A	-1.24%