QQA vs. GK ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) to AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK)

QQA

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF

QQA Description

The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by: (1) investing in a portfolio of U.S. equity securities designed to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the NASDAQ-100 Index® or U.S.-listed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that seek to track the performance of the index, or both, and (2) utilizing an options-based income strategy implemented through equity-linked notes (ELNs) with exposure to either the index or ETFs tracking the index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.25

Average Daily Volume

11,155

Number of Holdings ^*

101

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

GK

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF

GK Description

GK seeks to provide a broad thematic exposure by actively investing in a growth-focused portfolio of US companies across a variety of long-term macro trends. It uses a multi-thematic approach to concentrate on disruptive investment themes while ensuring diversification across holdings. In selecting stocks, the fund adviser uses a three-part system which involves fundamental, technical, and qualitative analysis on firms that could benefit from long-term changes in the market. The funds investments may be of any market capitalization and may focus on innovative companies related to renewable energy and sustainable transportation, technology frontiers, video gaming and Esports, cannabis, online gambling, top consumer brands, pet and animal wellness, real estate disruption, healthcare and biotechnology, and the media industry. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.54

Average Daily Volume

3,196

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQA	GK
30 Days	4.30%	4.37%
60 Days	5.68%	6.23%
90 Days	6.30%	6.00%
12 Months		30.85%

11 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQA	Weight in GK	Overlap
AAPL	C	6.56%	6.4%	6.4%
AMD	F	1.08%	1.17%	1.08%
AMZN	C	4.08%	4.08%	4.08%
ASML	F	0.31%	1.39%	0.31%
AVGO	D	3.78%	3.36%	3.36%
GOOG	C	1.86%	4.23%	1.86%
MSFT	F	5.91%	7.18%	5.91%
NFLX	A	1.75%	6.9%	1.75%
NVDA	C	6.68%	8.78%	6.68%
REGN	F	0.4%	0.4%	0.4%
TSLA	B	2.98%	0.59%	0.59%

QQA Overweight 90 Positions Relative to GK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
META	D	3.69%
COST	B	1.99%
GOOGL	C	1.94%
TMUS	B	1.36%
CSCO	B	1.15%
ADBE	C	1.11%
PEP	F	1.08%
LIN	D	1.06%
INTU	C	0.95%
ISRG	A	0.93%
TXN	C	0.91%
QCOM	F	0.88%
BKNG	A	0.83%
CMCSA	B	0.82%
AMGN	D	0.75%
HON	B	0.74%
AMAT	F	0.69%
PANW	C	0.62%
VRTX	F	0.6%
ADP	B	0.6%
SBUX	A	0.55%
GILD	C	0.54%
MU	D	0.53%
ADI	D	0.51%
INTC	D	0.51%
MELI	D	0.47%
LRCX	F	0.45%
MDLZ	F	0.43%
CTAS	B	0.43%
PYPL	B	0.43%
KLAC	D	0.41%
SNPS	B	0.4%
MAR	B	0.39%
CDNS	B	0.39%
PDD	F	0.38%
MRVL	B	0.38%
CRWD	B	0.38%
FTNT	C	0.36%
CEG	D	0.35%
ORLY	B	0.35%
CSX	B	0.34%
ADSK	A	0.32%
DASH	A	0.32%
ABNB	C	0.29%
ROP	B	0.29%
PCAR	B	0.29%
CHTR	C	0.28%
CPRT	A	0.27%
WDAY	B	0.27%
NXPI	D	0.27%
FANG	D	0.26%
TTD	B	0.26%
AEP	D	0.25%
MNST	C	0.25%
PAYX	C	0.25%
FAST	B	0.23%
ODFL	B	0.23%
ROST	C	0.23%
EA	A	0.21%
BKR	B	0.21%
KDP	D	0.21%
VRSK	A	0.2%
LULU	C	0.19%
KHC	F	0.19%
XEL	A	0.19%
CTSH	B	0.19%
DDOG	A	0.19%
EXC	C	0.19%
TEAM	A	0.19%
AZN	D	0.18%
GEHC	F	0.18%
IDXX	F	0.17%
CCEP	C	0.17%
MCHP	D	0.16%
ZS	C	0.15%
DXCM	D	0.15%
TTWO	A	0.15%
ON	D	0.14%
CSGP	D	0.14%
ANSS	B	0.14%
CDW	F	0.12%
ILMN	D	0.11%
WBD	C	0.11%
GFS	C	0.11%
BIIB	F	0.11%
MDB	C	0.1%
ARM	D	0.08%
MRNA	F	0.07%
DLTR	F	0.07%
SMCI	F	0.05%

QQA Underweight 19 Positions Relative to GK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TT	A	-5.59%
BX	A	-5.1%
DIS	B	-5.09%
LEN	D	-4.88%
NVO	D	-4.34%
IBIT	A	-4.24%
ORCL	B	-3.51%
MGM	D	-3.19%
HD	A	-2.65%
DELL	C	-2.13%
SYK	C	-1.98%
WMT	A	-1.85%
LPLA	A	-1.62%
UBER	D	-1.58%
ONON	A	-1.38%
FLUT	A	-1.33%
GD	F	-1.32%
VICI	C	-1.09%
LLY	F	-0.95%