QLTY vs. XMVM ETF Comparison

Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM)
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.55

Average Daily Volume

257,208

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMVM

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF

XMVM Description The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index (the "underlying index"). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider compiles, maintains and calculates the underlying index, which is designed to track the performance of approximately 80 stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® that have the highest “value” and “momentum” scores.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$59.30

Average Daily Volume

13,957

Number of Holdings *

79

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QLTY XMVM
30 Days 0.18% 5.19%
60 Days 1.34% 10.91%
90 Days 3.63% 9.88%
12 Months 29.17% 29.66%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QLTY Weight in XMVM Overlap
ARMK B 2.56% 1.26% 1.26%
QLTY Overweight 33 Positions Relative to XMVM
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT C 6.46%
AAPL C 5.33%
ORCL A 4.71%
META B 4.5%
GOOGL C 4.43%
JNJ D 4.24%
ABT C 4.17%
UNH B 3.62%
TXN B 3.53%
ACN B 3.3%
V A 3.22%
PG C 3.2%
ISRG A 2.92%
KLAC F 2.85%
LRCX F 2.85%
CRM B 2.84%
KO F 2.81%
HLT A 2.62%
ELV F 2.5%
WFC A 2.45%
AVGO C 2.45%
MRK F 2.41%
AMZN A 2.4%
USB B 2.31%
OTIS D 2.25%
TJX A 2.14%
GE D 1.73%
MDLZ F 1.72%
LLY F 1.61%
STZ D 1.59%
CI D 1.49%
DGX B 1.35%
TMO F 0.91%
QLTY Underweight 78 Positions Relative to XMVM
Symbol Grade Weight
LAD B -3.04%
AVT C -2.28%
UNM A -2.01%
CNX B -1.98%
X D -1.88%
CNO B -1.85%
GHC B -1.81%
ARW F -1.77%
PFGC B -1.74%
WBS A -1.73%
TMHC B -1.71%
PBF F -1.65%
OZK B -1.63%
ONB B -1.62%
AN C -1.62%
SNX C -1.62%
PNFP B -1.6%
DINO D -1.56%
R B -1.53%
PAG B -1.51%
CADE B -1.5%
PPC C -1.49%
FNB B -1.49%
UMBF B -1.43%
ZION B -1.39%
JLL C -1.39%
THC B -1.38%
WTFC B -1.36%
CMC B -1.36%
KBH D -1.36%
ASB B -1.35%
JEF B -1.34%
USFD B -1.34%
HWC B -1.34%
TCBI B -1.33%
MTG C -1.33%
EWBC B -1.31%
THO B -1.3%
TOL B -1.27%
VNO C -1.25%
JHG A -1.25%
IBOC B -1.23%
ORI A -1.21%
INGR B -1.17%
AMG B -1.14%
TEX D -1.14%
FLR C -1.13%
RGA A -1.12%
SLM A -1.08%
OSK B -1.07%
OVV C -1.06%
ESNT D -1.05%
PVH C -1.05%
PK C -0.98%
SF A -0.97%
STWD C -0.97%
ALLY C -0.95%
FNF C -0.95%
CIVI D -0.94%
DTM A -0.94%
TNL A -0.93%
POST D -0.93%
RS C -0.89%
MTDR B -0.88%
UFPI B -0.88%
SAIC D -0.86%
PR C -0.84%
MUSA B -0.82%
MUR D -0.8%
CHRD D -0.79%
ASGN D -0.75%
VSH F -0.74%
SWX B -0.74%
WU F -0.71%
TKR F -0.63%
ENS D -0.6%
GAP B -0.54%
AMKR F -0.53%
Compare ETFs