QLTY vs. JHDV ETF Comparison

Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF (JHDV)
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.53

Average Daily Volume

265,453

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
JHDV

John Hancock U.S. High Dividend ETF

JHDV Description Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in dividend-paying U.S. large- and mid-cap equity securities. These dividend-paying U.S. large- and mid-cap equity securities are incorporated in, or have their primary listing in, the United States. Dividend-paying U.S. equity securities in which the fund may invest include common and preferred stocks, convertible securities, rights, warrants, and real estate investment trusts ("REITs") listed on any U.S. exchange.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.57

Average Daily Volume

204

Number of Holdings *

83

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QLTY JHDV
30 Days 1.40% 1.67%
60 Days 0.46% 4.43%
90 Days 2.30% 6.25%
12 Months 26.48% 32.93%
11 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QLTY Weight in JHDV Overlap
AAPL C 5.33% 5.46% 5.33%
ABT B 4.17% 0.87% 0.87%
ACN C 3.3% 1.54% 1.54%
JNJ D 4.24% 1.0% 1.0%
KLAC D 2.85% 1.35% 1.35%
LLY F 1.61% 1.57% 1.57%
LRCX F 2.85% 1.06% 1.06%
MSFT F 6.46% 5.81% 5.81%
ORCL B 4.71% 1.69% 1.69%
TXN C 3.53% 1.84% 1.84%
USB A 2.31% 0.25% 0.25%
QLTY Overweight 23 Positions Relative to JHDV
Symbol Grade Weight
META D 4.5%
GOOGL C 4.43%
UNH C 3.62%
V A 3.22%
PG A 3.2%
ISRG A 2.92%
CRM B 2.84%
KO D 2.81%
HLT A 2.62%
ARMK B 2.56%
ELV F 2.5%
WFC A 2.45%
AVGO D 2.45%
MRK F 2.41%
AMZN C 2.4%
OTIS C 2.25%
TJX A 2.14%
GE D 1.73%
MDLZ F 1.72%
STZ D 1.59%
CI F 1.49%
DGX A 1.35%
TMO F 0.91%
QLTY Underweight 72 Positions Relative to JHDV
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA C -6.62%
MO A -2.19%
OKE A -2.18%
BMY B -2.17%
PM B -2.1%
TROW B -2.05%
BEN C -2.04%
SPG B -2.0%
BLK C -1.97%
WSO A -1.96%
UPS C -1.96%
CME A -1.92%
VICI C -1.87%
PCAR B -1.86%
GLPI C -1.83%
VZ C -1.82%
LYB F -1.8%
PRU A -1.8%
IBM C -1.76%
XOM B -1.54%
CSCO B -1.46%
INTU C -1.42%
PAYX C -1.41%
KHC F -1.38%
QCOM F -1.29%
SBUX A -1.13%
BBY D -1.09%
WMB A -1.05%
IPG D -1.02%
SO D -1.01%
IVZ B -0.95%
ROK B -0.84%
VRT B -0.82%
AMCR D -0.82%
HD A -0.8%
CAG D -0.76%
ADP B -0.73%
CVX A -0.7%
CMCSA B -0.7%
VST B -0.63%
NEE D -0.6%
MPWR F -0.6%
KMI A -0.6%
HPQ B -0.58%
DKS C -0.58%
OMC C -0.57%
FNF B -0.54%
GRMN B -0.5%
TGT F -0.48%
AFG A -0.43%
CVS D -0.41%
PFG D -0.4%
GEN B -0.37%
DUK C -0.36%
NTAP C -0.34%
WSM B -0.33%
HLI B -0.33%
HBAN A -0.32%
UNP C -0.32%
WING D -0.31%
NXPI D -0.31%
PSA D -0.31%
BAP B -0.3%
ETN A -0.29%
CFG B -0.28%
MDT D -0.27%
ADI D -0.27%
ADM D -0.27%
HPE B -0.27%
CUBE D -0.27%
PKG A -0.26%
DRI B -0.25%
Compare ETFs