QCLN vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)

QCLN

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund

QCLN Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield (before the fund's fees and expenses) of an equity index called the NASDAQ(R) Clean Edge(R) Green Energy Index(SM). The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in common stocks that comprise the index. The index is a modified market capitalization-weighted index in which larger companies receive a larger Index weighting and includes caps to prevent high concentrations among larger alternative energy stocks. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.64

Average Daily Volume

114,314

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.25

Average Daily Volume

9,570

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QCLN	ERTH
30 Days	0.69%	-2.79%
60 Days	-3.34%	-5.02%
90 Days	-5.93%	-3.99%
12 Months	-5.85%	-3.19%

15 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QCLN	Weight in ERTH	Overlap
AMPS	C	0.36%	0.07%	0.07%
ARRY	F	0.64%	0.27%	0.27%
CHPT	F	0.26%	0.1%	0.1%
ENPH	F	4.45%	2.01%	2.01%
FSLR	F	7.28%	4.43%	4.43%
LCID	F	2.82%	0.58%	0.58%
MNTK	F	0.34%	0.06%	0.06%
NEP	F	0.88%	0.37%	0.37%
ORA	B	2.67%	1.04%	1.04%
PLUG	F	0.96%	0.36%	0.36%
RIVN	F	5.43%	1.77%	1.77%
RUN	F	1.35%	0.56%	0.56%
SEDG	F	0.41%	0.17%	0.17%
SHLS	F	0.48%	0.2%	0.2%
TSLA	B	12.33%	7.03%	7.03%

QCLN Overweight 31 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ON	D	7.3%
AYI	B	5.49%
ALB	B	4.8%
OLED	F	3.64%
ITRI	C	2.94%
AEIS	C	2.35%
ENS	F	2.18%
ALGM	D	2.14%
POWI	F	1.96%
HASI	D	1.78%
MP	C	1.71%
BE	B	1.68%
FLNC	D	1.51%
CWEN	C	1.26%
VICR	C	0.98%
SQM	D	0.85%
RNW	D	0.72%
AMSC	B	0.68%
ASPN	F	0.65%
PSNY	F	0.58%
WOLF	F	0.54%
AMRC	D	0.51%
CLNE	F	0.35%
WLDN	C	0.33%
LYTS	B	0.33%
NOVA	F	0.28%
EOSE	D	0.27%
LNZA	F	0.13%
BLNK	F	0.09%
WBX	F	0.08%
TPIC	F	0.06%

QCLN Underweight 25 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DLR	B	-5.84%
NVDA	B	-5.76%
LI	F	-3.17%
WMS	F	-2.13%
XPEV	C	-1.85%
VNO	C	-1.58%
BMI	B	-1.55%
DAR	C	-1.54%
MTH	D	-1.53%
NIO	F	-1.52%
KBH	D	-1.38%
WFG	C	-1.2%
CUZ	B	-1.12%
DEI	B	-0.75%
AAT	B	-0.34%
ERII	F	-0.25%
BZH	C	-0.23%
BDN	C	-0.21%
PGRE	F	-0.21%
REX	D	-0.17%
JKS	F	-0.16%
RDUS	B	-0.1%
TUYA	D	-0.08%
MERC	F	-0.06%
RENB	F	-0.05%