PWB vs. RUNN ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Growth (PWB) to Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN)
PWB
PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Growth
PWB Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Large Cap Growth IntellidexSM Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index seeks to provide capital appreciation while maintaining consistent stylistically accurate exposure. The Style Intellidexes apply a rigorous 10-factor style isolation process to objectively segregate companies into their appropriate investment style and size universe. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$104.86
Average Daily Volume
20,153
50
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
RUNN Description
The fund is in an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded equity securities of large and mid-sized U.S. companies with market capitalizations of at least $5 billion. The fund is roughly equally-weighted with 50-75 stocks typically held in the portfolio. The fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in non-U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.03
Average Daily Volume
42,104
55
Performance
| Period | PWB | RUNN |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 4.71% | 3.98% |
| 60 Days | 6.46% | 5.29% |
| 90 Days | 10.09% | 7.85% |
| 12 Months | 39.80% | 31.92% |
PWB Overweight 43 Positions Relative to RUNN
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL | B | 4.12% | |
| CRM | B | 3.82% | |
| AMZN | C | 3.72% | |
| NFLX | A | 3.67% | |
| TMUS | B | 3.55% | |
| NVDA | C | 3.49% | |
| META | D | 3.39% | |
| MA | C | 3.34% | |
| GOOGL | C | 3.25% | |
| MSFT | F | 3.14% | |
| COST | B | 3.1% | |
| AAPL | C | 3.05% | |
| ADBE | C | 2.84% | |
| LLY | F | 2.51% | |
| SPOT | B | 1.84% | |
| FICO | B | 1.77% | |
| BKNG | A | 1.67% | |
| FTNT | C | 1.62% | |
| KKR | A | 1.61% | |
| PWR | A | 1.56% | |
| TT | A | 1.52% | |
| HWM | A | 1.52% | |
| HLT | A | 1.5% | |
| CEG | D | 1.5% | |
| MSI | B | 1.49% | |
| AXP | A | 1.48% | |
| ANET | C | 1.46% | |
| CTAS | B | 1.42% | |
| APH | A | 1.42% | |
| ALL | A | 1.38% | |
| WM | A | 1.38% | |
| PGR | A | 1.37% | |
| NU | C | 1.35% | |
| SPGI | C | 1.32% | |
| TDG | D | 1.32% | |
| MCO | B | 1.3% | |
| ECL | D | 1.3% | |
| SCCO | F | 1.25% | |
| AMAT | F | 1.24% | |
| MELI | D | 1.2% | |
| CL | D | 1.13% | |
| KLAC | D | 1.04% | |
| MPWR | F | 0.8% |
PWB Underweight 48 Positions Relative to RUNN
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HON | B | -1.9% | |
| J | F | -1.86% | |
| CW | B | -1.86% | |
| FDS | B | -1.86% | |
| AME | A | -1.86% | |
| WSO | A | -1.86% | |
| PH | A | -1.85% | |
| PRI | A | -1.85% | |
| FI | A | -1.85% | |
| TXRH | C | -1.84% | |
| ITT | A | -1.83% | |
| LDOS | C | -1.83% | |
| TDY | B | -1.83% | |
| EME | C | -1.82% | |
| RBA | A | -1.82% | |
| ADP | B | -1.82% | |
| BR | A | -1.81% | |
| SYK | C | -1.8% | |
| SAIA | B | -1.79% | |
| ACN | C | -1.79% | |
| BRO | B | -1.78% | |
| DRI | B | -1.78% | |
| NSC | B | -1.77% | |
| DECK | A | -1.75% | |
| GGG | B | -1.74% | |
| FELE | B | -1.74% | |
| CACI | D | -1.74% | |
| GOOG | C | -1.72% | |
| APD | A | -1.72% | |
| CSL | C | -1.72% | |
| SSNC | B | -1.71% | |
| TSCO | D | -1.71% | |
| NVT | B | -1.71% | |
| TJX | A | -1.71% | |
| ROP | B | -1.7% | |
| AJG | B | -1.68% | |
| UNH | C | -1.68% | |
| TTC | D | -1.68% | |
| CI | F | -1.67% | |
| DOX | D | -1.65% | |
| STE | F | -1.64% | |
| MMC | B | -1.64% | |
| BDX | F | -1.63% | |
| ICE | C | -1.6% | |
| AVY | D | -1.59% | |
| FCN | D | -1.57% | |
| IQV | D | -1.55% | |
| ICLR | D | -1.52% |
PWB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RUNN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
