PGJ vs. VWO ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.20

Average Daily Volume

188,692

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

VWO

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF

VWO Description

The investment seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of stocks issued by companies located in emerging market countries. The fund employs an indexing investment approach by investing substantially all (approximately 95%) of its assets in the common stocks included in the FTSE Emerging Index, while employing a form of sampling to reduce risk. The FTSE Emerging Index includes approximately 851 common stocks of companies located in emerging markets around the world. As of May 31, 2013, the largest markets covered in the index were China, Brazil, Taiwan, and India.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.12

Average Daily Volume

8,147,943

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PGJ	VWO
30 Days	-7.18%	-4.81%
60 Days	16.70%	1.40%
90 Days	14.48%	1.17%
12 Months	2.66%	15.46%

35 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in PGJ	Weight in VWO	Overlap
ATAT	B	1.1%	0.01%	0.01%
ATHM	D	1.01%	0.0%	0.0%
ATHM	D	1.01%	0.02%	0.02%
BABA	D	7.44%	2.42%	2.42%
BEKE	C	4.86%	0.13%	0.13%
BIDU	F	6.19%	0.31%	0.31%
BILI	C	1.39%	0.07%	0.07%
BZ	F	2.6%	0.06%	0.06%
CSIQ	F	0.46%	0.01%	0.01%
DADA	F	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%
DAO	C	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%
DDL	B	0.33%	0.01%	0.01%
DQ	D	0.84%	0.01%	0.01%
EH	C	0.44%	0.01%	0.01%
FINV	C	0.65%	0.01%	0.01%
GDS	B	1.18%	0.02%	0.02%
GOTU	F	0.25%	0.01%	0.01%
HUYA	F	0.17%	0.0%	0.0%
IQ	F	0.7%	0.01%	0.01%
JKS	D	0.5%	0.01%	0.01%
LI	F	2.72%	0.15%	0.15%
MOMO	D	0.64%	0.01%	0.01%
NIO	F	3.5%	0.09%	0.09%
QFIN	B	2.37%	0.04%	0.04%
RLX	C	0.6%	0.02%	0.02%
SOHU	F	0.26%	0.0%	0.0%
TAL	D	2.52%	0.05%	0.05%
TCOM	B	9.12%	0.36%	0.36%
TME	F	3.57%	0.09%	0.09%
VIPS	F	3.21%	0.06%	0.06%
VNET	D	0.25%	0.01%	0.01%
WB	F	0.45%	0.01%	0.01%
XPEV	C	1.39%	0.09%	0.09%
YMM	C	3.05%	0.07%	0.07%
YUMC	B	9.25%	0.19%	0.19%

PGJ Overweight 20 Positions Relative to VWO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JD	C	8.94%
ZTO	D	3.39%
NTES	C	3.19%
HTHT	C	3.11%
ZLAB	C	0.8%
MNSO	D	0.53%
TIGR	C	0.48%
LX	C	0.27%
QD	B	0.25%
NOAH	C	0.24%
RERE	D	0.17%
KC	B	0.14%
API	B	0.1%
TUYA	C	0.1%
DOYU	B	0.1%
WDH	C	0.09%
BZUN	F	0.07%
CAAS	B	0.07%
NIU	F	0.06%
CBAT	F	0.05%

PGJ Underweight 47 Positions Relative to VWO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HDB	C	-1.24%
PDD	F	-1.02%
IBN	C	-0.62%
VALE	F	-0.48%
UMC	F	-0.16%
BGNE	D	-0.15%
CHT	D	-0.12%
ABEV	D	-0.11%
ASAI	F	-0.08%
WIT	B	-0.08%
ERJ	A	-0.06%
BCH	D	-0.06%
ITUB	D	-0.06%
GGB	B	-0.05%
UMC	F	-0.05%
CHT	D	-0.04%
RDY	D	-0.03%
CIB	C	-0.03%
SBSW	D	-0.03%
BRFS	D	-0.03%
CSAN	F	-0.03%
SGRP	D	-0.02%
SBS	C	-0.02%
WIT	B	-0.02%
CAR	C	-0.02%
EC	D	-0.01%
CIG	C	-0.01%
IMOS	F	-0.01%
BSAC	D	-0.01%
ERJ	A	-0.01%
ELP	F	-0.01%
YY	C	-0.01%
AKO.A	D	-0.01%
BSBR	F	-0.01%
BBD	D	-0.01%
ENIC	D	-0.0%
BAOS	F	-0.0%
JEWL	D	-0.0%
GGB	B	-0.0%
BAK	F	-0.0%
ASAI	F	-0.0%
EBR	F	-0.0%
UBSI	A	-0.0%
CAN	C	-0.0%
AZUL	F	-0.0%
SID	F	-0.0%
SQM	D	-0.0%