PGJ vs. PSCD ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (PSCD)

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.70

Average Daily Volume

46,980

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSCD

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio

PSCD Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Capped Consumer Discretionary Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US consumer discretionary companies. These companies are principally engaged in providing consumer goods and services that are cyclical in nature, including retail, automotive, leisure and recreation, media and real estate. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$102.46

Average Daily Volume

2,309

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PGJ	PSCD
30 Days	-0.41%	0.10%
60 Days	-6.79%	-1.73%
90 Days	2.94%	3.90%
12 Months	-12.20%	10.15%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in PGJ	Weight in PSCD	Overlap

PGJ Overweight 54 Positions Relative to PSCD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	C	8.2%
TCOM	D	8.19%
JD	D	6.95%
BIDU	D	6.91%
YUMC	F	6.6%
NTES	F	4.58%
TME	B	4.39%
BEKE	D	3.96%
ZTO	F	3.87%
NIO	F	3.84%
BZ	D	3.61%
VIPS	F	3.41%
YMM	D	3.22%
HTHT	F	3.15%
TAL	F	2.69%
LI	F	2.59%
QFIN	C	1.77%
IQ	F	1.24%
XPEV	D	1.2%
BILI	C	1.15%
ATHM	C	1.13%
HOLI	C	0.94%
RLX	F	0.79%
ATAT	C	0.75%
MNSO	F	0.74%
DQ	F	0.71%
MOMO	C	0.65%
CSIQ	D	0.63%
GDS	C	0.63%
FINV	C	0.57%
JKS	F	0.57%
ZLAB	F	0.54%
GOTU	D	0.53%
WB	F	0.48%
TIGR	C	0.37%
EH	F	0.36%
SOHU	B	0.3%
HUYA	D	0.27%
QD	F	0.23%
VNET	C	0.2%
RERE	D	0.19%
DOYU	B	0.19%
DDL	C	0.18%
NOAH	F	0.17%
LX	F	0.14%
TUYA	F	0.13%
KC	F	0.12%
API	F	0.11%
WDH	D	0.1%
DADA	F	0.1%
DAO	D	0.09%
BZUN	D	0.07%
NIU	D	0.06%
IMAB	F	0.06%

PGJ Underweight 83 Positions Relative to PSCD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ANF	C	-5.41%
MTH	C	-3.33%
IBP	C	-2.76%
ABG	C	-2.68%
VFC	D	-2.53%
SIG	D	-2.33%
GPI	D	-2.28%
BOOT	C	-2.28%
ASO	F	-2.22%
AAP	F	-2.1%
AEO	D	-2.1%
TPH	B	-2.04%
MHO	C	-1.93%
SHAK	D	-1.91%
KTB	D	-1.9%
EAT	D	-1.85%
SHOO	B	-1.71%
PENN	C	-1.65%
LRN	D	-1.62%
FTDR	D	-1.58%
CVCO	C	-1.55%
LCII	D	-1.52%
ATGE	A	-1.51%
DORM	D	-1.49%
URBN	A	-1.44%
NWL	F	-1.41%
STRA	D	-1.41%
KSS	D	-1.4%
PATK	C	-1.35%
CCS	C	-1.31%
VSTO	B	-1.28%
MODG	D	-1.25%
FOXF	D	-1.19%
FL	D	-1.12%
PHIN	D	-1.08%
LGIH	D	-1.07%
SONO	F	-1.05%
CAKE	D	-1.03%
HBI	C	-0.99%
BLMN	F	-0.98%
LZB	B	-0.92%
WGO	F	-0.92%
THRM	D	-0.92%
DAN	F	-0.91%
LEG	D	-0.88%
PZZA	F	-0.87%
OXM	D	-0.86%
WOR	F	-0.83%
GRBK	A	-0.82%
PRDO	D	-0.82%
ODP	F	-0.75%
VSCO	D	-0.74%
PLAY	F	-0.72%
SBH	C	-0.68%
CAL	D	-0.64%
BKE	C	-0.63%
GIII	F	-0.62%
SABR	D	-0.61%
WWW	D	-0.61%
HIBB	A	-0.61%
EYE	F	-0.58%
JACK	F	-0.56%
CBRL	F	-0.52%
MCRI	C	-0.52%
BJRI	B	-0.49%
AXL	F	-0.48%
SAH	D	-0.47%
XPEL	F	-0.42%
RGR	F	-0.42%
MNRO	F	-0.41%
LESL	F	-0.4%
GDEN	F	-0.38%
SCVL	B	-0.38%
HZO	C	-0.37%
ETD	D	-0.37%
MCW	F	-0.37%
GES	D	-0.32%
DIN	F	-0.31%
SMP	F	-0.3%
CHUY	F	-0.25%
MOV	D	-0.23%
HVT	F	-0.19%
DBI	F	-0.17%