NULV vs. CPAI ETF Comparison

or Try an Advanced Search...

NULV vs. CPAI ETF Comparison

Comparison of NuShares ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) to Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)

NULV

NuShares ESG Large-Cap Value ETF

NULV Description

The Fund seeks to track the investments results, before fees and expenses, of the TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Value Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.74

Average Daily Volume

107,252

Number of Holdings ^*

103

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description

CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.28

Average Daily Volume

7,177

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	NULV	CPAI
30 Days	2.49%	7.98%
60 Days	3.24%	10.10%
90 Days	6.48%	12.45%
12 Months	26.45%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in NULV	Weight in CPAI	Overlap
CAH	B	1.2%	2.01%	1.2%
COR	B	1.39%	2.01%	1.39%
HCA	F	1.37%	1.55%	1.37%
OKE	A	1.74%	2.35%	1.74%
ORCL	B	2.85%	2.1%	2.1%
PGR	A	1.5%	1.89%	1.5%

NULV Overweight 97 Positions Relative to CPAI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DIS	B	2.25%
KO	D	2.11%
IBM	C	2.05%
FI	A	1.99%
TXN	C	1.97%
PEP	F	1.92%
LOW	D	1.89%
VZ	C	1.89%
INTC	D	1.85%
C	A	1.82%
PNC	B	1.76%
AMGN	D	1.71%
WELL	A	1.7%
DHR	F	1.69%
GS	A	1.69%
BKR	B	1.67%
BK	A	1.64%
JNJ	D	1.64%
DE	A	1.6%
ADI	D	1.56%
MS	A	1.54%
TRV	B	1.54%
MRK	F	1.52%
CI	F	1.5%
MMM	D	1.5%
CSCO	B	1.48%
MMC	B	1.46%
KR	B	1.45%
EXC	C	1.36%
SBUX	A	1.36%
ADP	B	1.36%
ECL	D	1.29%
NXPI	D	1.28%
ED	D	1.26%
AXP	A	1.24%
BAC	A	1.23%
AMT	D	1.21%
FDX	B	1.12%
FTV	C	1.08%
ADM	D	1.06%
CAT	B	1.04%
RF	A	0.95%
UPS	C	0.93%
ES	D	0.88%
LYB	F	0.87%
CBOE	B	0.85%
FIS	C	0.82%
FSLR	F	0.81%
A	D	0.77%
HD	A	0.76%
KMB	D	0.72%
BR	A	0.71%
J	F	0.71%
CHD	B	0.7%
IR	B	0.7%
URI	B	0.7%
KDP	D	0.69%
WTW	B	0.68%
GILD	C	0.65%
JCI	C	0.64%
HPQ	B	0.59%
PPG	F	0.55%
STLD	B	0.54%
BG	F	0.51%
MET	A	0.45%
NEM	D	0.43%
PHM	D	0.42%
SOLV	C	0.41%
HIG	B	0.41%
EQIX	A	0.41%
ATO	A	0.4%
HOLX	D	0.37%
OC	A	0.36%
HOOD	B	0.35%
MOS	F	0.34%
CNP	B	0.32%
SPGI	C	0.29%
DINO	D	0.28%
QRVO	F	0.26%
IPG	D	0.23%
PSA	D	0.19%
WDC	D	0.19%
TGT	F	0.17%
TFC	A	0.17%
SYY	B	0.16%
ETN	A	0.14%
IRM	D	0.1%
BALL	D	0.1%
BMY	B	0.09%
ZBH	C	0.09%
PRU	A	0.08%
REGN	F	0.04%
AWK	D	0.04%
ACN	C	0.03%
STE	F	0.02%
CNH	C	0.02%
WTRG	B	0.02%

NULV Underweight 43 Positions Relative to CPAI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TRGP	B	-2.61%
SFM	A	-2.49%
SKYW	B	-2.47%
TDS	B	-2.45%
HTZ	C	-2.35%
UNM	A	-2.3%
NTGR	B	-2.29%
CARG	C	-2.27%
GDDY	A	-2.25%
BRBR	A	-2.24%
VIRT	B	-2.24%
CNO	A	-2.14%
FTI	A	-2.12%
CLBT	B	-2.11%
EQH	B	-2.1%
CVLT	B	-2.09%
FTDR	A	-2.09%
GNW	A	-2.07%
ZIM	C	-2.06%
MSI	B	-2.05%
PBI	B	-2.05%
ACIW	B	-2.04%
GOOGL	C	-2.03%
TJX	A	-1.91%
PAA	B	-1.88%
PRM	C	-1.88%
META	D	-1.87%
LESL	C	-1.87%
PAGP	A	-1.87%
LDOS	C	-1.86%
AAPL	C	-1.86%
RTX	C	-1.85%
WES	C	-1.85%
MSFT	F	-1.83%
THC	D	-1.77%
NYT	C	-1.76%
BRC	D	-1.74%
MHO	D	-1.73%
ROST	C	-1.72%
WBA	F	-1.7%
UHS	D	-1.58%
LLY	F	-1.57%
AGL	F	-0.82%