NEWZ vs. BDIV ETF Comparison
Comparison of StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF (NEWZ) to AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV)
NEWZ
StockSnips AI-Powered Sentiment US All Cap ETF
NEWZ Description
NEWZ navigates market complexities through a proprietary news media sentiment signal which combines AI and NLP technologies. This signal is generated from textual sources, such as news articles, blogs, and SEC filings, processed using advanced machine learning algorithms. These algorithms sift through vast amounts of data to assess investor sentiment and identify stocks with the most positive news coverage. The process begins by screening US-listed equity securities based on capitalization, volatility, ROE, news coverage volume, and inclusion in Zacks sector and industry classifications. Selections are made based on the sentiment signal, which also integrates a sentiment momentum signal indicating shifts in investor sentiment over time. After the screening, the portfolio typically comprises the top 30 to 50 stocks, all equally weighted. Throughout this process, the fund prioritizes reliability, gathering information from reputable news outlets such as Zacks, Motley Fool, and CNBC. The fund is rebalanced and reconstituted monthly.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.75
Average Daily Volume
5,355
30
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
BDIV Description
The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities that pay dividends. The fund manager attempts to achieve a faster dividend growth than the market, with a lower portfolio beta, and an aggregate yield that is equal to or greater than the S&P 500®.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$20.03
Average Daily Volume
1,606
34
Performance
| Period | NEWZ | BDIV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.66% | -0.64% |
| 60 Days | 4.12% | 2.04% |
| 90 Days | 6.94% | 5.28% |
| 12 Months |
NEWZ Overweight 27 Positions Relative to BDIV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANET | C | 4.0% | |
| MSI | A | 3.59% | |
| APH | B | 3.57% | |
| UTHR | B | 3.52% | |
| NTAP | D | 3.52% | |
| PCTY | B | 3.48% | |
| KKR | A | 3.48% | |
| CLH | C | 3.42% | |
| PAYX | B | 3.4% | |
| CORT | B | 3.39% | |
| COR | B | 3.34% | |
| TXRH | A | 3.34% | |
| GRMN | B | 3.33% | |
| FTNT | A | 3.33% | |
| TSM | B | 3.32% | |
| ERIE | F | 3.3% | |
| CHKP | D | 3.29% | |
| BR | A | 3.29% | |
| BOOT | C | 3.28% | |
| ISRG | A | 3.25% | |
| RMD | C | 3.21% | |
| JKHY | D | 3.09% | |
| BAH | D | 3.05% | |
| DGX | A | 2.97% | |
| SHOP | A | 2.93% | |
| BRO | B | 2.84% | |
| BMI | B | 2.77% |
NEWZ Underweight 31 Positions Relative to BDIV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | D | -7.59% | |
| AAPL | C | -5.75% | |
| UNH | B | -4.2% | |
| CVX | A | -3.42% | |
| JPM | A | -3.28% | |
| COST | B | -3.17% | |
| TMUS | A | -3.1% | |
| LOW | A | -3.04% | |
| LIN | D | -3.0% | |
| PM | A | -2.76% | |
| MS | A | -2.74% | |
| V | A | -2.58% | |
| TJX | A | -2.26% | |
| AVGO | C | -2.22% | |
| NEE | C | -2.18% | |
| MCK | A | -2.11% | |
| MMC | C | -2.1% | |
| UNP | D | -2.04% | |
| PEP | F | -2.03% | |
| JNJ | D | -2.02% | |
| LLY | F | -1.98% | |
| CME | A | -1.98% | |
| LRCX | F | -1.96% | |
| CEG | D | -1.92% | |
| MDLZ | F | -1.89% | |
| MDT | D | -1.88% | |
| EXR | C | -1.79% | |
| PH | A | -1.71% | |
| CDW | F | -1.71% | |
| WEC | A | -1.7% | |
| O | D | -1.48% |
NEWZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BDIV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
