MILN vs. WLDR ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Millennials Thematic ETF (MILN) to Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR)

MILN

Global X Millennials Thematic ETF

MILN Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the INDXX Millennials Thematic Index. The fund invests more than 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of U.S. listed companies that provide exposure to the millennial generation, as defined by the index provider. The millennial generation refers to the demographic cohort in the U.S. with birth years ranging from 1980 to 2000. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.53

Average Daily Volume

9,853

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

WLDR

Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF

WLDR Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index (the index). The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities included in the index. The index is expected to consist of approximately 150 to 250 stocks of companies located in the U.S. and in at least three countries outside of the U.S. and may invest in up to 20 countries. It will be significantly invested in the securities of international companies in addition to securities of U.S. companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.92

Average Daily Volume

2,931

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	MILN	WLDR
30 Days	3.77%	2.55%
60 Days	12.73%	5.53%
90 Days	8.46%	6.31%
12 Months	40.38%	35.99%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in MILN	Weight in WLDR	Overlap
	EBAY	A	2.45%	2.15%	2.15%
	META	A	2.99%	3.1%	2.99%

MILN Overweight 75 Positions Relative to WLDR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SE	B	3.64%
AAPL	C	3.59%
SPOT	B	3.35%
COST	C	3.33%
PYPL	C	3.26%
BKNG	C	3.23%
FI	A	3.2%
HD	A	3.17%
LOW	A	3.13%
SBUX	B	3.12%
NFLX	A	3.11%
GOOGL	B	2.83%
DASH	A	2.78%
UBER	C	2.74%
AMZN	C	2.74%
INTU	F	2.72%
NKE	D	2.68%
CMG	C	2.63%
AVB	C	2.37%
SQ	D	2.3%
DIS	D	2.26%
LULU	D	2.21%
ABNB	D	2.14%
EQR	C	2.08%
INVH	D	1.59%
CVNA	A	1.46%
EXPE	B	1.44%
SNAP	D	1.12%
UDR	C	1.1%
CPT	C	0.98%
DKS	D	0.91%
KMX	F	0.9%
SFM	A	0.81%
MTCH	B	0.75%
SKX	B	0.67%
SOFI	C	0.57%
VFC	B	0.56%
AN	C	0.56%
PLNT	B	0.52%
ETSY	F	0.5%
LTH	C	0.46%
W	D	0.4%
ZG	C	0.39%
VSCO	C	0.38%
VMEO	C	0.38%
LRN	C	0.38%
COLM	B	0.37%
SLM	C	0.37%
UAA	B	0.37%
LYFT	D	0.37%
LC	B	0.37%
CARG	C	0.36%
IRT	C	0.35%
PRDO	D	0.35%
PTON	C	0.35%
HIMS	B	0.34%
CPRI	B	0.34%
NNI	C	0.33%
ANGI	D	0.33%
CSR	D	0.32%
LAUR	C	0.31%
GHC	B	0.3%
PWSC	C	0.3%
CARS	F	0.27%
STRA	F	0.25%
YELP	D	0.24%
CRI	D	0.24%
XPOF	F	0.23%
CAR	D	0.23%
DBI	F	0.22%
ZIP	D	0.22%
COUR	F	0.17%
TRIP	F	0.15%
ACCD	F	0.12%
CHGG	F	0.07%

MILN Underweight 68 Positions Relative to WLDR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HPQ	C	-3.65%
NTAP	D	-3.38%
AMAT	B	-3.19%
APP	A	-3.01%
DELL	C	-2.87%
AZO	D	-2.47%
IBM	B	-2.3%
WSM	B	-2.29%
SSNC	C	-2.03%
CTSH	B	-1.88%
JPM	D	-1.83%
DOCU	B	-1.82%
VZ	A	-1.47%
CMCSA	B	-1.37%
OMC	C	-1.27%
CARR	A	-1.21%
BRK.A	C	-1.21%
MRK	F	-1.18%
EMN	C	-1.14%
BK	C	-1.13%
CAT	A	-1.11%
SYF	B	-1.02%
HCA	B	-0.99%
ELV	F	-0.91%
CAH	B	-0.89%
VTRS	D	-0.86%
MCK	F	-0.85%
RCL	C	-0.84%
CI	D	-0.83%
TROW	D	-0.82%
TEVA	D	-0.82%
CNC	F	-0.77%
KR	C	-0.76%
PCAR	D	-0.73%
VST	A	-0.71%
ACI	F	-0.65%
MO	D	-0.64%
CNM	F	-0.63%
UAL	B	-0.63%
HMC	D	-0.6%
ETR	A	-0.58%
FANG	D	-0.57%
RNR	A	-0.57%
ALL	B	-0.57%
PSX	D	-0.56%
URI	C	-0.55%
DAL	C	-0.55%
MPC	F	-0.55%
HOOD	C	-0.53%
RGA	C	-0.53%
VLO	F	-0.53%
EVRG	C	-0.53%
AER	D	-0.51%
MGM	D	-0.5%
CCEP	C	-0.49%
PHM	A	-0.48%
LEN	B	-0.47%
TOL	A	-0.46%
TSN	D	-0.44%
SPG	A	-0.42%
VICI	C	-0.4%
STLA	F	-0.4%
DOC	C	-0.4%
F	D	-0.36%
TAP	D	-0.35%
HST	D	-0.33%
STLD	B	-0.24%
RS	D	-0.22%