MID vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.64

Average Daily Volume

4,858

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.62

Average Daily Volume

191,886

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MID PGJ
30 Days 0.62% -3.59%
60 Days 2.00% 14.09%
90 Days 6.42% 18.85%
12 Months 33.72% 3.75%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MID Weight in PGJ Overlap
MID Overweight 40 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
MSCI C 5.64%
ESI B 4.85%
DUOL A 4.55%
MPWR F 4.05%
POOL D 4.0%
AVNT B 3.95%
BFAM F 3.94%
NET B 3.77%
LII A 3.48%
MANH D 3.47%
RSG A 3.45%
CMG C 3.05%
CDW F 2.72%
CHD A 2.72%
HUBB B 2.71%
CDNS B 2.63%
TRGP A 2.44%
VST A 2.37%
ENPH F 2.26%
IDXX F 2.16%
NTRA A 2.07%
ONON B 2.07%
XYL D 1.93%
ABNB C 1.9%
EFX F 1.86%
ALNY D 1.78%
COR B 1.74%
ARGX A 1.69%
TPG A 1.6%
IQV F 1.59%
NU C 1.53%
PODD B 1.5%
VRT A 1.48%
CNM C 1.37%
DXCM C 1.33%
GEHC C 1.27%
TECH F 1.07%
BLD F 0.98%
AZEK B 0.98%
J D 0.87%
MID Underweight 54 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC B -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU D -6.21%
BEKE C -4.54%
NTES C -3.64%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN A -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
BILI D -1.27%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM C -1.06%
DQ C -0.87%
ZLAB C -0.77%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO C -0.53%
JKS D -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH C -0.45%
WB C -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL B -0.34%
VNET C -0.28%
QD B -0.27%
LX C -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH C -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC A -0.19%
RERE C -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API B -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA D -0.11%
WDH C -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS B -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs