MID vs. NOBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$60.90

Average Daily Volume

4,828

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF

NOBL Description The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P 500® Dividend Aristocrats® Index (the "index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.15

Average Daily Volume

413,183

Number of Holdings *

65

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MID NOBL
30 Days -1.90% -2.25%
60 Days 0.33% 0.11%
90 Days 5.33% 4.06%
12 Months 32.20% 20.26%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MID Weight in NOBL Overlap
CHD A 2.72% 1.53% 1.53%
MID Overweight 39 Positions Relative to NOBL
Symbol Grade Weight
MSCI A 5.64%
ESI B 4.85%
DUOL B 4.55%
MPWR F 4.05%
POOL D 4.0%
AVNT B 3.95%
BFAM F 3.94%
NET B 3.77%
LII A 3.48%
MANH D 3.47%
RSG B 3.45%
CMG B 3.05%
CDW F 2.72%
HUBB B 2.71%
CDNS B 2.63%
TRGP A 2.44%
VST A 2.37%
ENPH F 2.26%
IDXX F 2.16%
NTRA B 2.07%
ONON B 2.07%
XYL D 1.93%
ABNB C 1.9%
EFX F 1.86%
ALNY D 1.78%
COR B 1.74%
ARGX B 1.69%
TPG A 1.6%
IQV F 1.59%
NU C 1.53%
PODD A 1.5%
VRT A 1.48%
CNM C 1.37%
DXCM C 1.33%
GEHC D 1.27%
TECH F 1.07%
BLD F 0.98%
AZEK B 0.98%
J D 0.87%
MID Underweight 64 Positions Relative to NOBL
Symbol Grade Weight
EMR A -1.77%
NUE D -1.72%
GWW B -1.66%
FAST B -1.66%
DOV B -1.65%
GPC D -1.64%
TROW A -1.62%
CINF A -1.61%
ITW B -1.61%
ABBV F -1.6%
SHW C -1.6%
ALB C -1.59%
BEN C -1.59%
ADP B -1.59%
CAH A -1.59%
CAT B -1.59%
ROP C -1.59%
NDSN C -1.58%
BRO B -1.58%
CTAS B -1.58%
CVX A -1.57%
SYY B -1.56%
PNR A -1.56%
CLX A -1.55%
CHRW A -1.53%
XOM A -1.53%
GD D -1.53%
TGT C -1.52%
SPGI C -1.52%
WMT A -1.52%
FRT C -1.51%
KVUE A -1.51%
EXPD D -1.51%
ATO A -1.5%
SJM D -1.49%
ABT A -1.49%
PPG D -1.49%
MCD D -1.48%
WST C -1.48%
IBM D -1.48%
LIN D -1.48%
LOW A -1.48%
ESS A -1.48%
AOS F -1.48%
APD A -1.47%
HRL F -1.47%
KMB C -1.46%
MDT D -1.46%
MKC D -1.46%
JNJ D -1.45%
AFL C -1.45%
ECL D -1.45%
PG C -1.45%
BDX F -1.44%
PEP F -1.44%
CB C -1.43%
KO D -1.43%
ADM D -1.4%
AMCR D -1.39%
ED D -1.38%
CL C -1.37%
NEE C -1.36%
SWK F -1.35%
O D -1.34%
Compare ETFs