LCDS vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)

LCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large, well established companies. Many of the equity securities in the fund"s portfolio will be technology companies or companies that rely heavily on technological advances. In managing the fund, the adviser employs a fundamental data science enabled investment approach that combines research, data insights, and risk management. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.58

Average Daily Volume

109

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description

QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.75

Average Daily Volume

265,453

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LCDS	QLTY
30 Days	2.99%	1.40%
60 Days	5.00%	0.46%
90 Days	6.45%	2.30%
12 Months		26.48%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in LCDS	Weight in QLTY	Overlap
AAPL	C	5.88%	5.33%	5.33%
AMZN	C	4.7%	2.4%	2.4%
AVGO	D	1.31%	2.45%	1.31%
CI	F	0.6%	1.49%	0.6%
CRM	B	1.25%	2.84%	1.25%
GOOGL	C	3.04%	4.43%	3.04%
HLT	A	0.63%	2.62%	0.63%
KO	D	0.73%	2.81%	0.73%
LLY	F	1.11%	1.61%	1.11%
LRCX	F	0.22%	2.85%	0.22%
MDLZ	F	0.99%	1.72%	0.99%
META	D	3.39%	4.5%	3.39%
MSFT	F	7.47%	6.46%	6.46%
TJX	A	0.53%	2.14%	0.53%
UNH	C	2.16%	3.62%	2.16%
WFC	A	2.44%	2.45%	2.44%

LCDS Overweight 71 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	C	7.58%
MA	C	1.98%
XOM	B	1.79%
ABBV	D	1.51%
BMY	B	1.47%
SYK	C	1.47%
AXP	A	1.46%
PM	B	1.45%
BAC	A	1.34%
LOW	D	1.33%
TT	A	1.32%
CMCSA	B	1.24%
UPS	C	1.22%
HWM	A	1.15%
TSLA	B	1.14%
EOG	A	1.14%
AMP	A	1.13%
HON	B	1.12%
CSX	B	1.1%
PGR	A	1.02%
COP	C	1.02%
NXPI	D	0.93%
MET	A	0.91%
REGN	F	0.89%
INTU	C	0.88%
NOC	D	0.87%
SO	D	0.87%
MU	D	0.87%
MCD	D	0.87%
CME	A	0.76%
DHR	F	0.76%
BRK.A	B	0.75%
SQ	B	0.75%
NEE	D	0.73%
DOV	A	0.71%
FICO	B	0.71%
DD	D	0.71%
DLR	B	0.7%
STX	D	0.7%
TMUS	B	0.69%
PCG	A	0.69%
APH	A	0.68%
MS	A	0.66%
MDT	D	0.66%
AXTA	A	0.66%
TFC	A	0.64%
SPOT	B	0.62%
PLD	D	0.61%
CMS	C	0.59%
HPE	B	0.58%
CMG	B	0.55%
DE	A	0.54%
AZO	C	0.54%
LDOS	C	0.53%
CTSH	B	0.48%
PFGC	B	0.47%
VRTX	F	0.45%
FCNCA	A	0.41%
ELAN	D	0.39%
WEX	D	0.38%
BJ	A	0.36%
MTG	C	0.35%
COST	B	0.34%
SNPS	B	0.32%
CHD	B	0.3%
EQIX	A	0.25%
MSI	B	0.21%
SBUX	A	0.14%
LIN	D	0.13%
APTV	D	0.11%
EL	F	0.1%

LCDS Underweight 18 Positions Relative to QLTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	B	-4.71%
JNJ	D	-4.24%
ABT	B	-4.17%
TXN	C	-3.53%
ACN	C	-3.3%
V	A	-3.22%
PG	A	-3.2%
ISRG	A	-2.92%
KLAC	D	-2.85%
ARMK	B	-2.56%
ELV	F	-2.5%
MRK	F	-2.41%
USB	A	-2.31%
OTIS	C	-2.25%
GE	D	-1.73%
STZ	D	-1.59%
DGX	A	-1.35%
TMO	F	-0.91%