LCDS vs. PWB ETF Comparison

Comparison of JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) to PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Growth (PWB)

LCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large, well established companies. Many of the equity securities in the fund"s portfolio will be technology companies or companies that rely heavily on technological advances. In managing the fund, the adviser employs a fundamental data science enabled investment approach that combines research, data insights, and risk management. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.69

Average Daily Volume

102

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PWB

PowerShares Dynamic LargeCap Growth

PWB Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Large Cap Growth IntellidexSM Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index seeks to provide capital appreciation while maintaining consistent stylistically accurate exposure. The Style Intellidexes apply a rigorous 10-factor style isolation process to objectively segregate companies into their appropriate investment style and size universe. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$104.92

Average Daily Volume

20,315

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LCDS	PWB
30 Days	3.20%	4.75%
60 Days	4.49%	6.07%
90 Days	6.77%	10.00%
12 Months		39.85%

20 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in LCDS	Weight in PWB	Overlap
AAPL	B	5.88%	3.05%	3.05%
AMZN	C	4.7%	3.72%	3.72%
APH	B	0.68%	1.42%	0.68%
AXP	A	1.46%	1.48%	1.46%
COST	B	0.34%	3.1%	0.34%
CRM	B	1.25%	3.82%	1.25%
FICO	B	0.71%	1.77%	0.71%
GOOGL	C	3.04%	3.25%	3.04%
HLT	A	0.63%	1.5%	0.63%
HWM	B	1.15%	1.52%	1.15%
LLY	F	1.11%	2.51%	1.11%
MA	B	1.98%	3.34%	1.98%
META	D	3.39%	3.39%	3.39%
MSFT	D	7.47%	3.14%	3.14%
MSI	C	0.21%	1.49%	0.21%
NVDA	C	7.58%	3.49%	3.49%
PGR	A	1.02%	1.37%	1.02%
SPOT	B	0.62%	1.84%	0.62%
TMUS	A	0.69%	3.55%	0.69%
TT	B	1.32%	1.52%	1.32%

LCDS Overweight 67 Positions Relative to PWB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WFC	A	2.44%
UNH	B	2.16%
XOM	C	1.79%
ABBV	D	1.51%
BMY	B	1.47%
SYK	C	1.47%
PM	B	1.45%
BAC	A	1.34%
LOW	C	1.33%
AVGO	D	1.31%
CMCSA	C	1.24%
UPS	C	1.22%
TSLA	B	1.14%
EOG	C	1.14%
AMP	B	1.13%
HON	B	1.12%
CSX	B	1.1%
COP	D	1.02%
MDLZ	F	0.99%
NXPI	D	0.93%
MET	A	0.91%
REGN	F	0.89%
INTU	C	0.88%
NOC	D	0.87%
SO	D	0.87%
MU	D	0.87%
MCD	D	0.87%
CME	A	0.76%
DHR	D	0.76%
BRK.A	B	0.75%
SQ	B	0.75%
NEE	D	0.73%
KO	D	0.73%
DOV	A	0.71%
DD	D	0.71%
DLR	A	0.7%
STX	D	0.7%
PCG	B	0.69%
MS	B	0.66%
MDT	D	0.66%
AXTA	A	0.66%
TFC	B	0.64%
PLD	D	0.61%
CI	D	0.6%
CMS	C	0.59%
HPE	B	0.58%
CMG	B	0.55%
DE	B	0.54%
AZO	C	0.54%
LDOS	D	0.53%
TJX	A	0.53%
CTSH	B	0.48%
PFGC	A	0.47%
VRTX	D	0.45%
FCNCA	B	0.41%
ELAN	F	0.39%
WEX	F	0.38%
BJ	B	0.36%
MTG	B	0.35%
SNPS	B	0.32%
CHD	B	0.3%
EQIX	A	0.25%
LRCX	F	0.22%
SBUX	B	0.14%
LIN	D	0.13%
APTV	F	0.11%
EL	F	0.1%

LCDS Underweight 30 Positions Relative to PWB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	C	-4.12%
NFLX	B	-3.67%
V	A	-3.47%
ADBE	C	-2.84%
BKNG	B	-1.67%
FTNT	C	-1.62%
KKR	B	-1.61%
ETN	A	-1.6%
GWW	A	-1.59%
PWR	A	-1.56%
CEG	D	-1.5%
IR	A	-1.48%
ANET	C	-1.46%
BSX	C	-1.43%
CTAS	B	-1.42%
ALL	B	-1.38%
WM	A	-1.38%
NU	D	-1.35%
GD	F	-1.32%
SPGI	C	-1.32%
TDG	D	-1.32%
RSG	A	-1.32%
MCO	A	-1.3%
ECL	D	-1.3%
SCCO	F	-1.25%
AMAT	F	-1.24%
MELI	C	-1.2%
CL	D	-1.13%
KLAC	F	-1.04%
MPWR	F	-0.8%