LCDS vs. PGRO ETF Comparison

Comparison of JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) to Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO)

LCDS

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDS Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large, well established companies. Many of the equity securities in the fund"s portfolio will be technology companies or companies that rely heavily on technological advances. In managing the fund, the adviser employs a fundamental data science enabled investment approach that combines research, data insights, and risk management. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$57.08

Average Daily Volume

116

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PGRO

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF

PGRO Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund invests mainly in common stocks of large U.S. companies, with a focus on growth stocks. Under normal circumstances, it invests at least 80% of the fundâs net assets in companies of a size similar to those in the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The fundâs investment manager, Putnam Investment Management, LLC (Putnam Management) may consider, among other factors, a companyâs valuation, financial strength, growth potential, competitive position in its industry, projected future earnings, cash flows and dividends when deciding whether to buy or sell investments. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.77

Average Daily Volume

3,975

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	LCDS	PGRO
30 Days	1.03%	2.41%
60 Days	4.32%	5.27%
90 Days	5.73%	6.69%
12 Months		35.67%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in LCDS	Weight in PGRO	Overlap
AAPL	C	5.79%	10.98%	5.79%
AMZN	B	4.83%	8.36%	4.83%
AVGO	C	1.43%	4.19%	1.43%
CMG	C	0.54%	1.92%	0.54%
COST	A	0.34%	2.01%	0.34%
CRM	B	1.19%	2.11%	1.19%
DHR	D	0.8%	1.29%	0.8%
GOOGL	B	3.09%	5.27%	3.09%
LLY	F	1.2%	3.41%	1.2%
MA	B	1.95%	3.4%	1.95%
META	C	3.57%	3.97%	3.57%
MSFT	D	7.54%	12.43%	7.54%
NVDA	A	7.95%	11.08%	7.95%
SPOT	B	0.54%	0.84%	0.54%
TSLA	A	0.98%	1.61%	0.98%
TT	A	1.26%	1.5%	1.26%

LCDS Overweight 71 Positions Relative to PGRO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WFC	A	2.27%
UNH	C	2.19%
ABBV	F	1.8%
XOM	B	1.78%
AXP	B	1.45%
BMY	A	1.39%
SYK	A	1.38%
PM	A	1.35%
LOW	C	1.29%
BAC	A	1.27%
CMCSA	B	1.26%
UPS	C	1.19%
HWM	A	1.12%
CSX	C	1.11%
AMP	A	1.08%
HON	B	1.05%
EOG	A	1.04%
MDLZ	F	1.01%
MU	D	1.0%
COP	B	1.0%
PGR	B	1.0%
NXPI	F	0.99%
REGN	F	0.95%
NOC	D	0.91%
MET	A	0.87%
MCD	D	0.87%
INTU	B	0.86%
SO	C	0.85%
STX	D	0.75%
KO	D	0.74%
DD	D	0.74%
CME	A	0.73%
BRK.A	B	0.72%
APH	B	0.71%
NEE	C	0.7%
DOV	B	0.7%
TMUS	B	0.67%
DLR	A	0.67%
FICO	B	0.67%
MDT	D	0.66%
PCG	A	0.66%
AXTA	B	0.65%
MS	A	0.63%
LDOS	C	0.63%
SQ	A	0.62%
TFC	A	0.62%
HLT	A	0.61%
PLD	D	0.6%
CI	D	0.58%
HPE	B	0.57%
CMS	C	0.56%
DE	C	0.55%
AZO	C	0.53%
CTSH	C	0.51%
TJX	A	0.51%
VRTX	D	0.48%
PFGC	B	0.47%
ELAN	D	0.41%
FCNCA	A	0.4%
WEX	F	0.39%
BJ	B	0.36%
SNPS	C	0.35%
MTG	D	0.34%
CHD	A	0.28%
EQIX	A	0.25%
LRCX	F	0.24%
MSI	B	0.2%
LIN	D	0.14%
SBUX	A	0.13%
APTV	F	0.11%
EL	F	0.1%

LCDS Underweight 16 Positions Relative to PGRO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	A	-2.23%
NFLX	A	-2.21%
V	A	-1.91%
ISRG	A	-1.89%
CDNS	B	-1.71%
UBER	F	-1.62%
AMT	D	-1.6%
AMAT	F	-1.55%
SHW	C	-1.46%
NOW	B	-1.4%
WCN	A	-1.38%
CSGP	F	-1.11%
TDG	D	-1.1%
LYV	A	-0.93%
DKNG	B	-0.84%
IDXX	F	-0.78%