ICAP vs. XRLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) to PowerShares S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility Portfolio (XRLV)

ICAP

InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF

ICAP Description

The investment seeks to maximize income and pursue total return opportunities. The fund, under normal conditions, will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of companies that pay dividends during normal market conditions. The fund will invest primarily in securities of U.S. companies, but may invest in foreign securities, including securities of companies located in emerging markets. To obtain high yield and total return, the adviser will favor sectors and industries that it currently views are undervalued on a relative basis.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.20

Average Daily Volume

8,851

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XRLV

PowerShares S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility Portfolio

XRLV Description

The investment seeks investment results that generally correspond (before fees and expenses) to the price and yield of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index (the "underlying index"). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to include stocks exhibiting low volatility characteristics, after removing stocks that historically have performed poorly in rising interest rate environments. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.83

Average Daily Volume

1,017

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ICAP	XRLV
30 Days	5.15%	2.88%
60 Days	4.34%	7.20%
90 Days	11.48%	8.61%
12 Months	22.52%	18.19%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in ICAP	Weight in XRLV	Overlap
DOW	D	2.67%	0.84%	0.84%
DUK	C	1.99%	1.02%	1.02%
GD	B	0.16%	1.0%	0.16%
HON	D	0.18%	1.08%	0.18%
JNJ	C	0.1%	1.11%	0.1%
JPM	D	2.11%	0.98%	0.98%
KMI	B	1.15%	1.01%	1.01%
KO	C	0.08%	1.33%	0.08%
MCD	B	1.95%	1.09%	1.09%
MO	C	0.18%	0.94%	0.18%
OKE	B	0.16%	0.98%	0.16%
PEP	C	0.03%	1.02%	0.03%
PG	C	0.08%	1.18%	0.08%
PM	C	0.09%	1.08%	0.09%
SO	B	0.05%	0.96%	0.05%
WMB	B	0.17%	1.0%	0.17%

ICAP Overweight 50 Positions Relative to XRLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GS	C	7.49%
C	C	4.86%
EQIX	C	4.29%
AES	C	4.15%
KRC	B	3.64%
AVGO	C	3.41%
MTB	B	3.2%
MPLX	B	3.18%
FRT	C	3.11%
BXP	B	3.09%
SLMBP	B	2.95%
BAC	D	2.95%
CFG	C	2.88%
CVX	D	2.69%
ORCL	C	2.33%
AB	B	2.28%
ARE	C	2.19%
REXR	C	2.11%
KHC	C	2.1%
NYMTN	A	2.02%
DLR	B	2.01%
AMZN	C	1.95%
UGI	C	1.93%
TFC	C	1.92%
EIX	C	1.79%
VOD	C	1.72%
SPG	B	1.61%
O	C	1.48%
ARES	B	1.3%
CCI	C	1.29%
BLMN	F	1.21%
MRK	D	1.04%
D	C	0.99%
MSFT	C	0.92%
T	C	0.77%
NWN	C	0.75%
AMT	C	0.69%
IRM	C	0.68%
EMR	D	0.55%
IBM	B	0.45%
UNH	C	0.44%
RTX	C	0.43%
VZ	B	0.41%
UZE	C	0.41%
HPE	D	0.4%
MMM	B	0.36%
EPR	B	0.34%
NEE	C	0.23%
CAT	B	0.18%
ET	B	0.03%

ICAP Underweight 81 Positions Relative to XRLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BRK.A	C	-1.4%
TMUS	C	-1.28%
V	C	-1.27%
RSG	D	-1.23%
MMC	C	-1.21%
CL	D	-1.2%
L	C	-1.19%
WMT	C	-1.16%
TJX	B	-1.15%
MA	B	-1.15%
LIN	B	-1.11%
ROP	C	-1.08%
ITW	C	-1.07%
ATO	B	-1.07%
CB	B	-1.07%
AVY	C	-1.05%
BK	B	-1.05%
CME	C	-1.05%
MSI	B	-1.04%
HIG	B	-1.03%
REGN	C	-1.03%
MDLZ	B	-1.03%
UNP	C	-1.02%
AMP	A	-1.01%
YUM	D	-1.01%
ADP	B	-1.0%
CSCO	C	-0.99%
KDP	B	-0.98%
PPL	C	-0.98%
MET	B	-0.98%
LMT	C	-0.98%
AJG	D	-0.98%
CTAS	B	-0.98%
AME	C	-0.98%
MDT	C	-0.97%
CHD	D	-0.97%
PRU	C	-0.97%
VRSN	D	-0.96%
ED	C	-0.96%
AVB	B	-0.96%
KMB	D	-0.96%
WELL	C	-0.96%
WM	D	-0.96%
ETR	B	-0.95%
PAYX	C	-0.95%
PFG	B	-0.95%
FE	C	-0.95%
ABT	C	-0.95%
PEG	B	-0.95%
CMS	C	-0.95%
AFL	C	-0.95%
PKG	B	-0.95%
AIG	D	-0.95%
STZ	D	-0.95%
DRI	B	-0.95%
IEX	D	-0.95%
CSX	D	-0.94%
SRE	C	-0.94%
LNT	B	-0.94%
BRO	C	-0.93%
ECL	B	-0.93%
OMC	B	-0.93%
PPG	D	-0.92%
ABBV	C	-0.92%
NI	B	-0.92%
GIS	B	-0.92%
WEC	C	-0.92%
HLT	B	-0.91%
DGX	B	-0.91%
EA	D	-0.9%
ELV	C	-0.9%
LYB	D	-0.89%
CBOE	C	-0.89%
BR	D	-0.89%
HOLX	B	-0.89%
JKHY	B	-0.89%
EVRG	B	-0.88%
VRSK	D	-0.88%
SYY	D	-0.88%
BDX	D	-0.86%
MCK	F	-0.77%