EMSF vs. QCLN ETF Comparison
Comparison of Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF (EMSF) to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN)
EMSF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF
EMSF Description
EMSF actively invests in common and preferred stocks of companies in emerging markets, including countries that may be considered frontier. While the fund has an all-cap exposure, it expects to invest substantially in smaller companies. The fund looks for sustainable growth based on fundamental characteristics such as balance sheet information, size, cash flow stability, and financial health. It also applies various ESG standards, using third-party data and the adviser's proprietary research, to identify investments that potentially contribute to a sustainable future by addressing global environmental and social challenges. The fund also employs exclusionary ESG screens, which avoid controversial businesses such as tobacco, weapons, and fossil fuels. The fund may engage its portfolio companies on sustainability and governance matters through active dialogue, exercising shareholder rights, and encouraging enhanced ESG disclosure.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.79
Average Daily Volume
2,440
3
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
QCLN Description
The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield (before the fund's fees and expenses) of an equity index called the NASDAQ(R) Clean Edge(R) Green Energy Index(SM). The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in common stocks that comprise the index. The index is a modified market capitalization-weighted index in which larger companies receive a larger Index weighting and includes caps to prevent high concentrations among larger alternative energy stocks. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$37.59
Average Daily Volume
172,444
49
Performance
| Period | EMSF | QCLN |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.24% | -1.52% |
| 60 Days | 0.01% | 8.74% |
| 90 Days | -0.23% | 8.93% |
| 12 Months | -31.34% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EMSF | Weight in QCLN | Overlap |
|---|
EMSF Underweight 49 Positions Relative to QCLN
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | B | -9.46% | |
| ON | C | -7.93% | |
| FSLR | D | -7.85% | |
| ENPH | D | -6.89% | |
| RIVN | C | -5.66% | |
| ALB | F | -5.44% | |
| OLED | B | -4.81% | |
| AYI | D | -3.65% | |
| LCID | C | -3.01% | |
| ALGM | C | -2.67% | |
| ITRI | D | -2.23% | |
| ORA | C | -2.19% | |
| ENS | C | -2.03% | |
| AEIS | B | -1.97% | |
| POWI | D | -1.92% | |
| HASI | D | -1.66% | |
| BE | D | -1.45% | |
| RUN | C | -1.44% | |
| WOLF | F | -1.43% | |
| NEP | F | -1.3% | |
| AY | B | -1.25% | |
| FLNC | F | -1.19% | |
| CWEN | D | -1.05% | |
| MP | D | -1.04% | |
| ASPN | D | -0.92% | |
| PLUG | F | -0.89% | |
| SQM | D | -0.87% | |
| RNW | F | -0.8% | |
| ARRY | F | -0.79% | |
| SEDG | F | -0.71% | |
| VICR | F | -0.54% | |
| SHLS | F | -0.54% | |
| AMRC | F | -0.52% | |
| AMSC | B | -0.44% | |
| MNTK | C | -0.4% | |
| NOVA | D | -0.39% | |
| AMPS | D | -0.33% | |
| CHPT | D | -0.31% | |
| CLNE | F | -0.3% | |
| SPWR | F | -0.26% | |
| LYTS | D | -0.2% | |
| LNZA | F | -0.17% | |
| BLNK | C | -0.14% | |
| FCEL | F | -0.14% | |
| WBX | F | -0.13% | |
| LEV | F | -0.1% | |
| STEM | F | -0.09% | |
| PSNY | F | -0.09% | |
| MAXN | F | -0.03% |
EMSF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QCLN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
