EMIF vs. QCLN ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index Fund (EMIF) to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN)
EMIF

iShares S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index Fund

EMIF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of 30 of the largest emerging market equities in the infrastructure industry. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure IndexTM (the "underlying index"), which is designed to track performance of 30 of the largest publicly listed companies in the infrastructure industry in emerging markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.47

Average Daily Volume

864

Number of Holdings *

1

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QCLN

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund

QCLN Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield (before the fund's fees and expenses) of an equity index called the NASDAQ(R) Clean Edge(R) Green Energy Index(SM). The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in common stocks that comprise the index. The index is a modified market capitalization-weighted index in which larger companies receive a larger Index weighting and includes caps to prevent high concentrations among larger alternative energy stocks. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.07

Average Daily Volume

108,507

Number of Holdings *

46

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EMIF QCLN
30 Days 7.56% 4.14%
60 Days 14.15% 8.55%
90 Days 6.88% -1.18%
12 Months 27.09% -9.45%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EMIF Weight in QCLN Overlap
EMIF Overweight 1 Positions Relative to QCLN
Symbol Grade Weight
HKD C 0.0%
EMIF Underweight 46 Positions Relative to QCLN
Symbol Grade Weight
TSLA C -9.42%
FSLR C -8.71%
ON F -7.4%
ENPH F -7.36%
RIVN F -5.58%
ALB D -4.12%
OLED B -4.11%
AYI A -4.1%
LCID F -3.46%
ITRI C -2.45%
ALGM F -2.39%
ORA C -2.37%
RUN D -2.1%
ENS B -2.07%
HASI B -2.03%
AEIS B -2.0%
POWI F -1.83%
MP C -1.54%
FLNC C -1.5%
NEP D -1.33%
CWEN C -1.28%
BE F -1.24%
ASPN C -1.12%
PLUG D -1.02%
SQM D -0.85%
PSNY D -0.81%
RNW D -0.78%
VICR C -0.71%
SEDG F -0.67%
AMRC C -0.67%
NOVA F -0.66%
WOLF F -0.65%
ARRY F -0.52%
SHLS F -0.49%
AMSC C -0.45%
MNTK D -0.39%
CLNE C -0.35%
CHPT F -0.3%
EOSE B -0.29%
WLDN B -0.29%
AMPS F -0.27%
LYTS B -0.24%
LNZA D -0.17%
TPIC C -0.11%
WBX F -0.11%
BLNK F -0.09%

EMIF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords

Industries: Software - Application
Keywords: Digital Media
Compare ETFs