EBIZ vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X E-commerce ETF (EBIZ) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
EBIZ

Global X E-commerce ETF

EBIZ Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive E-commerce Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index. The index is designed to provide exposure to exchange-listed companies that are positioned to benefit from the increased adoption of e-commerce as a distribution model, including but not limited to companies whose principal business is in operating e-commerce platforms, providing e-commerce software and services, and/or selling goods and services online. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.60

Average Daily Volume

10,691

Number of Holdings *

32

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.66

Average Daily Volume

88,459

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EBIZ PGJ
30 Days 12.70% 37.10%
60 Days 21.16% 43.62%
90 Days 15.82% 27.77%
12 Months 53.53% 17.99%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EBIZ Weight in PGJ Overlap
BABA A 4.64% 9.94% 4.64%
JD A 4.73% 7.66% 4.73%
NTES C 3.52% 3.91% 3.52%
TCOM B 4.05% 8.33% 4.05%
VIPS C 3.62% 3.39% 3.39%
EBIZ Overweight 27 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
SE A 4.96%
SHOP C 4.68%
MELI C 4.64%
EBAY A 4.53%
CVNA A 4.53%
EXPE B 4.16%
GDDY D 4.1%
RBA D 3.9%
BKNG C 3.87%
AMZN C 3.79%
CSGP F 3.67%
WSM C 3.64%
W D 3.49%
ETSY F 3.36%
PDD D 3.13%
GLBE C 2.61%
ACVA C 2.37%
TRIP F 1.15%
SSTK F 0.69%
TREE C 0.52%
LQDT C 0.39%
ANGI C 0.37%
JMIA F 0.34%
VTEX C 0.29%
BIGC F 0.28%
QRTEA F 0.22%
GRPN F 0.17%
EBIZ Underweight 48 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC C -7.77%
BIDU C -6.87%
NIO C -4.32%
ZTO A -4.23%
BEKE A -3.74%
YMM B -3.12%
TME D -3.01%
HTHT B -2.91%
LI C -2.79%
BZ C -2.49%
QFIN B -2.32%
TAL C -2.08%
XPEV C -1.43%
ATHM A -1.2%
BILI A -1.18%
GDS B -1.17%
ATAT B -0.88%
DQ C -0.76%
RLX D -0.73%
ZLAB C -0.71%
MOMO A -0.7%
IQ D -0.69%
MNSO C -0.68%
FINV A -0.66%
CSIQ D -0.59%
JKS C -0.53%
WB C -0.45%
SOHU B -0.32%
EH D -0.31%
VNET B -0.31%
TIGR A -0.31%
GOTU D -0.27%
HUYA C -0.26%
QD C -0.23%
DDL A -0.23%
NOAH B -0.2%
RERE D -0.17%
LX A -0.15%
WDH C -0.1%
DOYU B -0.1%
API C -0.1%
TUYA C -0.1%
KC C -0.1%
DADA C -0.08%
DAO B -0.07%
BZUN B -0.07%
NIU B -0.06%
IMAB D -0.05%
Compare ETFs